Tzara
Continental
- Joined
- Aug 2, 2005
- Posts
- 7,661
Ssshh, ssshhh, Ange! This was a cleverly constructed straw man argument to lure 1201 into a trap where I could slice his feeble intellect into ribbons. (Oops! Clichéd phrasing there. Sorry. Perhaps I could chop his response in a Ronco Dice-a-Matic? Oh, nevermind.)Angeline said:I'm still trying to figure out where the cliches are in that Yeats. Don't some people have long heavy hair? (I do.) How else might one describe it to maintain the image? Weighty tresses of length? Yuck! And I rather like the image that "passion-dimmed eyes" evokes. I can't remember having heard that particular combination elsewhere--most people I know don't use the expression, but if they did would that make it bad in this poem? Maybe if I came from somewhere where the curlews were flying (I assume they are some kind of sea bird--I dunno, really), then it would be bad to use "curlew" in a poem?
I'm agreeing with you. Also, I love Yeats.
It all becomes a bit ridiculous. I refuse to put any word--and that does include "love," "soul," "bones," and "rainbow" on a no-no list. The problem isn't the words. The problem is when they're all jumbled together saying nothing--or nothing remarkable.
In my opinion.
My point, if I have one and since I am usually speaking (er, writing) from a position of almost complete total ignorance about poetry, poetics, aesthetics, or meterology (though not a weatherman, I often don't know which way the wind blows, thank you Bob Z.) is, I think, pretty much congruent with yours.
This poem, I think, if written by someone with lesser skills would be cliché. The basic subject (bird call/I'm sad/sexual memories of lover/I'm lonely/wind also makes me sad) is not particularly fresh. Could I quote examples where this particular sequence of theme was used poorly? No. Not the point.
The point is more, if you agree with my thesis that the theme is potentially cliché, how does Yeats avoid it? If he does.
I think what makes this poem is the central image, the lines:
passion-dimmed eyes and long heavy hair
That was shaken out over my breast
These lines work for me, actually make the poem for me. The phrase "passion-dimmed eyes" evokes an image I have been fortunate enough to see occasionally. I had a girlfriend who would get a kind of heavy lidded, look up at me, very sexual look in her eyes. So it is very evocative. But, how Yeats phrases it is very important. "[P]assion-dimmed eyes" both is kind of erotically euphonal (nnnnn, mmmmm, zzzzz) but "dimmed" is excellent. The light in the eyes has gone down a bit, but oh boy the electricity is still there in spades.That was shaken out over my breast
Had he said "passion-slitted eyes" instead, it wouldn't work. While that has kind of the same overall meaning, the assonance is gone, and "slitted" is, I think, cliché in context.
Similarly, he could have said "long thick hair" (which, combined with "passion-slitted eyes" would keep the syllable count the same, if not the scansion). But again, that kills the image. "[L]ong heavy hair" sounds heavy--the syllables landing plunk, plunk, plunk. Very evocative. "[L]ong thick hair" is nowhere near the same image, though fairly close, again, on meaning.
Oh, I'm babbling again.