So, Doms, is it because you are too inadequate in real life?

Slutacus said:
Indeed. I make a kink distinction, however, between those whose lust expresses itself with happy cries of "Occupy me! Occupy me!" and those who prefer non-consensual occupation (or, "Occupy me when I don't want to be occupied!") I'm strongly in the second category; the first doesn't meet my needs. :)


So you agree with rape? thats a tad more extreme than having a good firewall.
 
hobbit. said:
So you agree with rape? thats a tad more extreme than having a good firewall.

I prefer rape for me, myself, and I. Not for anybody else. I would not say, in other words, "Hobbit, go rape that girl over there!" I would say, "Hobbit! Go rape me! And that's an order!"


What's a firewall? (just kidding--but I did dismantle mine, they caused me all kinds of trouble when I played my games).
 
Slutacus said:
Is that Hobbit for eek?

Close---mancunian for "oh for fuck's sake".


Rape by gnomes and little men is a fascinating hobby of mine. Thinking about it, i mean.
 
rosco rathbone said:
Rape by gnomes and little men is a fascinating hobby of mine. Thinking about it, i mean.

Ok. Physics lesson time. Little gnomes and little men (I assume you mean by that they are only slightly larger and maybe much smaller than the gnomes) have little tiny weewees. A normal-sized woman won't even notice she's being raped by one of them. In fact she might roll over and squish him in the middle of the his vicious sexual attack. It appears that you aren't a woman so maybe there's some weird male psychology going on here that I don't get, but still, what could possibly be the fascination of such a boring and unlikely-to-be-noticed act? I would think even a hobbit would be more fun, rape-wise.
 
Slutacus said:
Ok. Physics lesson time. Little gnomes and little men (I assume you mean by that they are only slightly larger and maybe much smaller than the gnomes) have little tiny weewees. A normal-sized woman won't even notice she's being raped by one of them. In fact she might roll over and squish him in the middle of the his vicious sexual attack. It appears that you aren't a woman so maybe there's some weird male psychology going on here that I don't get, but still, what could possibly be the fascination of such a boring and unlikely-to-be-noticed act? I would think even a hobbit would be more fun, rape-wise.

Gnomes and small men to me, are about 2-3 feet tall. Yes, their penises are small; they aren't especially concerned with what sensations the human females may or may not be having. I think that the women would probably have to either be tied down or ordered to remain still by me. How humiliating; to be forced to service a dwarf. Or other small ugly being.
 
Well, maybe... I was thinking of those little guys finding the c-hole mighty loose and slack for their rapacious purposes, but the b-hole wouldn't be too bad, and the m-hole is adjustable.

I agree, a woman would have to be tied down (or under strict threat not to move) to submit to that sort indignity, especially if the little men were as creepy and unchivalrous and smelly as popular culture suggests they are! The sexual revenge of the little man...it could be fun!

Questions: Do you see yourself as just the facilitator of the little mens' pleasure, or as one of them yourself, or as a normal-sized a co-raper?

I think the opposite, being a 2-3 foot little woman for a very big man would also be a blast. Not just for the little girl thing. He could also dress me up in odd little costumes, like a furry suit with holes cut out of it and make me pretend to be his pet dog or cat or ferret or hamster or monkey! He might put me on a high shelf in the closet or the top of the refrigerator for storage, though, and I wouldn't like that because I'd be afraid to jump down.
 
Slutacus said:
Questions: Do you see yourself as just the facilitator of the little mens' pleasure, or as one of them yourself, or as a normal-sized a co-raper?

Well, facilitator and onlooker, really. The little man is sort of the incarnated embodiment of all that is shrivelled, malevolent and chimplike about male lust. See also R. Crumb and huge female bodies...to an R. Crumb girl, a normal-sized man is a chimp/gnome/"service my dwarf". At some point I might motion for my evil familiar to pull out and step aside and attempt to gain some measure of sexual release, but I'd probably be just as well jerking off. In some senses, the orgone bubble is unpoppable. A thousand years, a million slavegirls, and a trillion gnome rapists and I don't think I'd be satisfied. The basic nature of desire.

I think the opposite, being a 2-3 foot little woman for a very big man would also be a blast. Not just for the little girl thing. He could also dress me up in odd little costumes, like a furry suit with holes cut out of it and make me pretend to be his pet dog or cat or ferret or hamster or monkey! He might put me on a high shelf in the closet or the top of the refrigerator for storage, though, and I wouldn't like that because I'd be afraid to jump down.

Yeah, I can dig this. I think it definitely says something about my psychosexuality that I really "feel" the other scenario more intensely, though.
 
rosco rathbone said:
A thousand years, a million slavegirls, and a trillion gnome rapists and I don't think I'd be satisfied. The basic nature of desire.

This is the best De Sade cliff note I've ever read.
 
Well I'm all over the "rape" thing as most on the board already know.

However about those gnomes see the 1.0 version of gnomes did have small thingies. But we got TONS of complaints from the gals being raped out there. So the 1.1 versions were equipped with gags and duct tape but we still got complaints. With the 1.2 version we "beefed" them up so to speak. You see sadly there aren't any industry standards. Of course it would be nice if they were all backward compatible too. We got around to that but not until the 2.0 series . . .

Fury :rose:
 
FurryFury said:
Well I'm all over the "rape" thing as most on the board already know.

However about those gnomes see the 1.0 version of gnomes did have small thingies. But we got TONS of complaints from the gals being raped out there. So the 1.1 versions were equipped with gags and duct tape but we still got complaints. With the 1.2 version we "beefed" them up so to speak. You see sadly there aren't any industry standards. Of course it would be nice if they were all backward compatible too. We got around to that but not until the 2.0 series . . .

Fury :rose:

Backward compatible, eh? I assume you don't mean in the xbox 360 sense? :)

Too bad they don't have a board here just for the rape thing.
 
Slutacus said:
Backward compatible, eh? I assume you don't mean in the xbox 360 sense? :)

Too bad they don't have a board here just for the rape thing.

LOL! Nope I don't mean a disaster of quite those proportions.

The Rape Board. Hmm? Sounds yummy.

Fury :rose:
 
rosco rathbone said:
Well, facilitator and onlooker, really. The little man is sort of the incarnated embodiment of all that is shrivelled, malevolent and chimplike about male lust. See also R. Crumb and huge female bodies...to an R. Crumb girl, a normal-sized man is a chimp/gnome/"service my dwarf". At some point I might motion for my evil familiar to pull out and step aside and attempt to gain some measure of sexual release, but I'd probably be just as well jerking off. In some senses, the orgone bubble is unpoppable. A thousand years, a million slavegirls, and a trillion gnome rapists and I don't think I'd be satisfied. The basic nature of desire.

It's odd to me that you don't want to be the stumpy vile little guy, you just want to watch him.

I was about to say that if you actually had someone like that who followed you around everywhere, even on dates, and was part of the complete package, you wouldn't have much luck with the ladies. But I take it back. I have a female friend who is also on a bdsm personal-ad site. She met this dom recently who told her he had a trained dog and that many women had come to his house just to do (or be done by) the dog, and, although he was rather suprised by all the eager and kinky female attention, he enjoyed sitting back watching them be done. I assume the same would eventually become true of even a wizened evil ugly little chimp-gnome-guy: at least among submissive females he would have great novelty value!
 
FurryFury said:
I'd rather the dog myself but someone would have to "make" me.

Fury :rose:

Agree wholeheartedly! That's the best way to be done by a dog. I like the idea of being tied down while it happens and not even being allowed to specify what holes the dog does (or doesn't) enter. :)
 
Slutacus said:
Agree wholeheartedly! That's the best way to be done by a dog. I like the idea of being tied down while it happens and not even being allowed to specify what holes the dog does (or doesn't) enter. :)

Natch!

You'd have to "force" me for a gnome or dog or anyone other than my husband.

For a dog one might want to bring a jar of peanut butter. . .

Fury :rose:
 
FurryFury said:
Natch!

You'd have to "force" me for a gnome or dog or anyone other than my husband.

For a dog one might want to bring a jar of peanut butter. . .

Fury :rose:

I have heard things about zee pea-nut buttah! But you know what would be really annoying? To be all tied down, expecting a maginificent and scary German Shepard or Rotty or other big fellow, and instead be confronted with a nasty little gnome-dog: a dachshound or a Benji or something just as small but meaner! It might make for an entertaining show, assuming the shrimpy dog could even be positioned correctly, but oh man, oh man, what a letdown for the tied-up woman about to have her first bow-wow experience! :(
 
A great place to start is with some reading.

I'd suggest:

When Someone You Love is Kinky by Dossie Easton and Janet Hardy

This book will help you decide if you can accept your potential lover's kink, and can help you confront some of your own issues of discomfort surrounding kink.

If it turns out that your mind is open to the possibilities, you may want to explore further:

Sensuous Magic: A Guide for Adventurous Lovers by Pat Califia

Different Loving : A Complete Exploration of the World of Sexual Dominance and Submission by William Brame and Gloria Brame

Consensual Sadomasochism : How to Talk About It and How to Do It Safely
by Bill Henkin and Sybil Holiday

SeanH said:
There was no malice behind it at all.
I have fallen head over heels for someone that is into this. I don't know where to fucking start. The other forums on lit have a rep for being nicer than the GB. I asked, OK?
 
Slutacus said:
I have heard things about zee pea-nut buttah! But you know what would be really annoying? To be all tied down, expecting a maginificent and scary German Shepard or Rotty or other big fellow, and instead be confronted with a nasty little gnome-dog: a dachshound or a Benji or something just as small but meaner! It might make for an entertaining show, assuming the shrimpy dog could even be positioned correctly, but oh man, oh man, what a letdown for the tied-up woman about to have her first bow-wow experience! :(

True dat!

Though I always loved Benji and so do my cats!

Fury :rose:
 
superlittlegirl said:
A great place to start is with some reading.

I'd suggest:

When Someone You Love is Kinky by Dossie Easton and Janet Hardy

This book will help you decide if you can accept your potential lover's kink, and can help you confront some of your own issues of discomfort surrounding kink.

If it turns out that your mind is open to the possibilities, you may want to explore further:

Sensuous Magic: A Guide for Adventurous Lovers by Pat Califia

Different Loving : A Complete Exploration of the World of Sexual Dominance and Submission by William Brame and Gloria Brame

Consensual Sadomasochism : How to Talk About It and How to Do It Safely
by Bill Henkin and Sybil Holiday


These books look great!

I just ordered Different Loving!

I also got The Loving Dominant and Screw the Roses I Want the Thorns.

The new sex books are here! The new sex books are here! Yay!

Fury :rose:
 
They are great, and congrats on your new books! Do you have a copy of The Ethical Slut by Dossie Easton and Janet Hardy? If you don't have it you should get it. Good stuff!

FurryFury said:
These books look great!

I just ordered Different Loving!

I also got The Loving Dominant and Screw the Roses I Want the Thorns.

The new sex books are here! The new sex books are here! Yay!

Fury :rose:
 
SeanH said:
Hey, it was a genuine question. The only reason I can logically come up with for the dom thing, is that they're so fucked in real life that the only way they can feel good is by humiliating someone else.
And I'm waiting for the show, too :D

How about someone actually having a dominant personality?
 
Back
Top