straight up my butt

[the_pet]

Plus you're surrounded by sadists and stuff.

....snicker....

 

[VelvetDarkness]

Two women having sex isn't a lesbian act?

I think my point was missed. I was talking about a "gay act" or a "gay experience" versus a gay person. Anything that two people of the same sex do together is a gay act. That's what I'm saying. So, yes, even if the wife was watching, two men having sex is still a "gay experience" - if the wife was participating I'd say it was a bisexual act. You don't have to be a gay person to have a gay experience.

Personally, I wouldn't call it a 'gay experience' because when I think about fun I've had with girls, I call it a 'bi experience' and I do that because I'm not a lesbian. To me, the idea of gayness or lesbianism suggests that a person fancies only people of the same gender. Bisexuality is bisexuality no matter who is actually in your bed.

 

[Adakgirl]

Velvet perceives this subject just like I do. It's kind of hard to put it into words but she does a pretty good job of it above.

Two women having sex isn't a lesbian act?

The way I understand it, no it is not. I say again, unless both the women are lesbians, two women having sex together would not be considered a lesbian act.

 

[Etoile]

It's all about separating the activity from the orientation. There is a lot of reason to do that if you're gay but closeted, on the down low, etc. But clearly here I'm in the minority, so I'll leave it alone.

 

[00Syd]

It's all about separating the activity from the orientation. There is a lot of reason to do that if you're gay but closeted, on the down low, etc. But clearly here I'm in the minority, so I'll leave it alone.

I'll just throw in that I agree with you that the act is separated from the orientation. While I am not gay I have had a gay experience. If I said that no, it was not a gay act, it was a bi act because I am not gay, I feel like I would be displaying some serious insecurity about what I just did.

Not to say that people who do choose to refer to an act between two people of the same sex who are not gay a bi act are insecure, that's just what it would be for me.

 

[ZRT]

Okay, let's bring back the OP and settle this once and for all.

Hey OP.

Did the balls touch?

If so, GAY.

If not, NOT-GAY. Just kinda, y'know, suspicious. Like, we'll be watching you for gay emergence.

(Which is fine, gay all you want. We're just settling an argument here.)

 

[Harmony_1985]

There is no argument as to whether its a gay experience or not because the whole OP is a big steaming pile of bullshit

 

[BiBunny]

I'll just throw in that I agree with you that the act is separated from the orientation. While I am not gay I have had a gay experience. If I said that no, it was not a gay act, it was a bi act because I am not gay, I feel like I would be displaying some serious insecurity about what I just did.

Not to say that people who do choose to refer to an act between two people of the same sex who are not gay a bi act are insecure, that's just what it would be for me.

I agree. I have both heterosexual and homosexual encounters on a semi-regular basis. If you look on the Kinsey scale, that's how such acts are described, as heterosexual and homosexual encounters.

Though I guess being fisted by Mistress while Master rammed his cock down my throat counts as a bisexual experience, since I was having both at once.

 

[Etoile]

There is no argument as to whether its a gay experience or not because the whole OP is a big steaming pile of bullshit

Well, yeah, but Adakgirl and I agree that we are being philosophical outside of the OP's wankery.

 

[Etoile]

I agree. I have both heterosexual and homosexual encounters on a semi-regular basis. If you look on the Kinsey scale, that's how such acts are described, as heterosexual and homosexual encounters.

Though I guess being fisted by Mistress while Master rammed his cock down my throat counts as a bisexual experience, since I was having both at once.

Exactly!

 

[gentelman324]

And what's the deal with airline food?

Thats not very nice, those people work hard on that food.

 

[Sir_Winston54]

Thats not very nice, those people work hard on that food.

Yeah. It's hard to make cardboard *look* like food.

Or should I have said, It's hard to make food taste like cardboard?

Now I'm confuzzled.

 

[Marquis]

I am so often amazed by what subjects will give birth to spirited debate on this forum.

 

[VelvetDarkness]

I agree. I have both heterosexual and homosexual encounters on a semi-regular basis. If you look on the Kinsey scale, that's how such acts are described, as heterosexual and homosexual encounters.

Though I guess being fisted by Mistress while Master rammed his cock down my throat counts as a bisexual experience, since I was having both at once.

I understand this concept better since 00Syd & BB chimed in. I suppose it doesn't really matter how you self identify as long as everyone you're involved with knows what your orientation is.

Can't say I've heard of Kinsey (pootles off to rape wiki).

 

[Harmony_1985]

Well, yeah, but Adakgirl and I agree that we are being philosophical outside of the OP's wankery.

I have a severe ear infection knocking me on my ass, I can't cope with that sort of stuff right now lol!

I understand this concept better since 00Syd & BB chimed in. I suppose it doesn't really matter how you self identify as long as everyone you're involved with knows what your orientation is.

Can't say I've heard of Kinsey (pootles off to rape wiki).

Everyone is too caught up on labelling themselves. Just be you.

 

[00Syd]

I am so often amazed by what subjects will give birth to spirited debate on this forum.

Me too!

I understand this concept better since 00Syd & BB chimed in. I suppose it doesn't really matter how you self identify as long as everyone you're involved with knows what your orientation is.

Can't say I've heard of Kinsey (pootles off to rape wiki).

Never heard of Kinsey?!?! And you call yourself a pervert...

/kidding

After wiki-ing him, what do you think of the man behind modern views of sexuality?

 

[Homburg]

Okay, let's bring back the OP and settle this once and for all.

Hey OP.

Did the balls touch?

If so, GAY.

If not, NOT-GAY. Just kinda, y'know, suspicious. Like, we'll be watching you for gay emergence.

(Which is fine, gay all you want. We're just settling an argument here.)

This is the new standard for what is gay sex and what is not?

It's all about the balls. Who knew?

--

I am so often amazed by what subjects will give birth to spirited debate on this forum.

No doubt. I'm boggled that this thread is still alive.

 

[Etoile]

No doubt. I'm boggled that this thread is still alive.

In the absence of an actual topic, we had to make our own!

After all, PrincessGoddess went on for PAAAAGES.

 

[Homburg]

In the absence of an actual topic, we had to make our own!

After all, PrincessGoddess went on for PAAAAGES.

Sure, but PG kept stirring the pudding with regular infusions of paranoia and wacked-out accusations. The OP here just seems a lil aw-hurt that we aren't appreciating his wank-material.

 

[HarlotMinx]

Okay, let's bring back the OP and settle this once and for all.

Hey OP.

Did the balls touch?

If so, GAY.

If not, NOT-GAY. Just kinda, y'know, suspicious. Like, we'll be watching you for gay emergence.

(Which is fine, gay all you want. We're just settling an argument here.)

Ah but what if he or the father has no balls for whatever reason? If one of them is missing a single ball and they touch, does it make him bi? Do bi men come into existence when one testicle touches a pair? If so it'd explain why there are so few of them around.....

 

[satindesire]

Ah but what if he or the father has no balls for whatever reason? If one of them is missing a single ball and they touch, does it make him bi? Do bi men come into existence when one testicle touches a pair? If so it'd explain why there are so few of them around.....

Yeah, but what if he has THREE testicles?! Eh? EH!?

 

[Sir_Winston54]

Ah but what if he or the father has no balls for whatever reason? If one of them is missing a single ball and they touch, does it make him bi? Do bi men come into existence when one testicle touches a pair? If so it'd explain why there are so few of them around.....

You're confused? That question confused me more than I already was!

Yeah, but what if he has THREE testicles?! Eh? EH!?

That would make him hetero-homo-bisexual, because he probably couldn't avoid each of his three testicles touching the other two at some point(s) in time. So at most any given time, one of his testicles would be homosexual (fondling/touching/molesting the other two), the other two would be hetero except when being touched/fondled/molested by the singleton, and all of them would be bisexual, because they had both hetero and homo experiences.



I think.

 

[Sir_Winston54]

Yeah, but what if he has THREE testicles?! Eh? EH!?

BTW, that fish pic/AV is very disturbing for some reason. Can/could/would you go back to a *you* pic for an AV?


I'm gonna go make a crabmeat quiche.

 

[ZRT]

Winston covered the tri-testicle question quite ably.

Now, the one-nut one is a conundrum. Further research is probably needed.

 

[satindesire]

That would make him hetero-homo-bisexual, because he probably couldn't avoid each of his three testicles touching the other two at some point(s) in time. So at most any given time, one of his testicles would be homosexual (fondling/touching/molesting the other two), the other two would be hetero except when being touched/fondled/molested by the singleton, and all of them would be bisexual, because they had both hetero and homo experiences.

I think.

What if two of his testicles were touching rather than just one? Would that make it a bisexual experience because two balls were touching? And how many of person 1's balls have to be touching person 2's balls? What if person 1 (having three testicles) had two testicles touching both of person 2's testicles? Would that make person 1 bisexual-homosexual or homosexual-homosexual and person 2 homosexual? And what if all 3 of person 1's testicles were touching just 1 of person 2's testicles? Would that make person 1 homosexual-homosexual-homosexual and person 2 bisexual?

BTW, that fish pic/AV is very disturbing for some reason. Can/could/would you go back to a *you* pic for an AV?


I'm gonna go make a crabmeat quiche.

My fishy is aDORKable.

But if you hate him I will find another one.