SpectreT
Knight in Tarnished Armor
- Joined
- Mar 1, 2001
- Posts
- 1,905
cymbidia said:I have not knowingly offered any bias toward or against anyone. If you feel i've offended you in that way, please point my errors out to me, here or in private. I think i usually choose my words very carefully, and have done so for a long time.
Additionally, throughout this thread (and in this forum) i try very hard to be careful to choose words to indicate the depth of my feelings about being fully submissive. To me, my submssion is not and will never be only the first stop on the BDSM Express - and i am taken aback at anyone who implies that being fully submissive is *anything* but as honorable and needful a way of being as are either of the others.
I didn't think my simple little bit of frustration would offend anyone; if anything i expected it to generate a little bit of discussion on what it is to be fully sub as opposed to being switch or being Dom/me. Excuse my gall in posting on this to begin with, then. I was obviously incorrect in my assumptions. One may not, it seems, speak out on this subject here, or at least i may not. Maybe i may not in this way? Which? In any case, shall i delete this horrible thread now or later?
Don't look at me.... you gotta work to offend me, and to get me in a discussion, all you have to do is post an unpopular idea or thought. Even if I don't agree, I'm likely to try and take up the case. I'm a compulsive Devil's Advocate.
In this case, I see the point. Allow me to say that those who are fully submissive are a little awe-inspiring to me, at least in the depths of their strength. My own strength is, like so many other parts of myself, divided.