Submissive vs. Slave

Aw, I thought you were my token jewish friend too! :(

And do you have your Zionist Conspiract badge showing that you have the right to enforce these supposed restrictions?

I can be your other token Jewish R/T friend, yes, it's true, I am a Jew!

When I used to work in NYC, I did some advertising with Howard Stern, when he read my name on the air, he said "This guy's name is Jeffrey Fine, we might as well call him Jeffrey Jew!"
 
Totally off topic, but I loved the Hebrew Hammer.

Oh, and I'm Jewish too, have I mentioned that?
 
I can be your other token Jewish R/T friend, yes, it's true, I am a Jew!

When I used to work in NYC, I did some advertising with Howard Stern, when he read my name on the air, he said "This guy's name is Jeffrey Fine, we might as well call him Jeffrey Jew!"

I'm fine with that! Course my wife can trace matrilinear descent from her Jewish great-grandma, my brother-from-another-mother is jewish, and now you, but it's funnier to have my wierd Canadian Warrior of Zion token jewish friend.
 
Ok I am way late on this but here it goes anyway. The only difference I can see between a slave and a submissive is their level of submission. ( No duhhh)
A slave can certainly have limits just like a submissive, however once they give up their submission, that submission is total and their Master's limits become their limits. They obey their Master and that's just the way it is. Whereas a submissive has some leeway. Yet when I think of submission, to me..submissive or slave, submission should be total, if you are giving it, then you should be willing give it all up, and your Dominant should take it all.
When it comes down to it, both can have limits, both have a voice, and both can simply walk away. Both are human beings. Both are submissive. Of course, this is simply my personal view of it.
 
Back
Top