As fat as that goes the wrong kind can be too personal though.
That is a fact! Especially for women on Lit....I’m sure their inbox is blown way out of proportion!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
As fat as that goes the wrong kind can be too personal though.
What about erotica? That's like a giant diry pm from someone you dont know.
Which erotica? Books you mean?
I was thinking more of short erotica like what you can find here or on Amazon.
I've only ever read one entire novel length romance novel because a friend talked me into it.
I've read a lot. It's mindless reading that I need as a break from more challenge literature that I usually read and love.
The vaste majority of them sucks. Especially those set in our time, and you can tell that the majority are also written by women. They make their male heroes speak and act as women would like them to act and speak, not how they are. And don't make me start with female heroine. Oh dear, oh dear! https://i.imgur.com/dCjhArB.gif
I do like some historical romances though and some set during the regency period. Most of them sound the same though. The usual tropes. But some of the authors can write very well. At least there is that.
I love romance novels for much the same reason: Most of them are so hilariously bad. Poor writing, hackneyed characters and plots, etc. But there's something of a replay value in romances, I don't know what it is.
I was reading a romance that was actually well written. Great characters, suspense, plot twists, the whole thing. But there were just some hilariously bizarre descriptive phrases.
"He smelled of man and pine cones and fresh mountain air."
OK, I grasp the scent of pine cones, I'm with you on that one. But if I can smell fresh mountain air, it's not really fresh, is it??
"She smelled of woman and soap."
Because if she smelled of man, that would be a hormone imbalance requiring immediate medical attention!![]()



I love romance novels for much the same reason: Most of them are so hilariously bad. Poor writing, hackneyed characters and plots, etc. But there's something of a replay value in romances, I don't know what it is.
I was reading a romance that was actually well written. Great characters, suspense, plot twists, the whole thing. But there were just some hilariously bizarre descriptive phrases.
"He smelled of man and pine cones and fresh mountain air."
OK, I grasp the scent of pine cones, I'm with you on that one. But if I can smell fresh mountain air, it's not really fresh, is it??
"She smelled of woman and soap."
Because if she smelled of man, that would be a hormone imbalance requiring immediate medical attention!![]()
Also thanks for not judging Orchidea73.
but also a short description of a past experience or something with no other build up can be enough to make me instantly highly aroused.
Oh god, the description of the smell of her skin or hair is just hilarious. Sometimes they use food (like fruits) that I have no clue what it is, let alone how do they smell.And let's not forget the "honeypot" for the vagina.
![]()
Starts re-writing my 843 pages long novel Ms. Honeypot that I was going to publish next week.And let's not forget the "honeypot" for the vagina.![]()
I posted here asking for pms once and got nothing.
still wanting?
No. dirty pm is too vague. I might get stuff i don't like.

I've read a lot. It's mindless reading that I need as a break from more challenge literature that I usually read and love.
The vaste majority of them sucks. Especially those set in our time, and you can tell that the majority are also written by women. They make their male heroes speak and act as women would like them to act and speak, not how they are. And don't make me start with female heroine. Oh dear, oh dear! https://i.imgur.com/dCjhArB.gif
I do like some historical romances though and some set during the regency period. Most of them sound the same though. The usual tropes. But some of the authors can write very well. At least there is that.
No. dirty pm is too vague. I might get stuff i don't like.
Sorry... I was being sarcastic![]()
Dirty PM’s great but I want to get to know the person too because nonstop sexually loaded chat will ultimately bore, me at least. Besides we have more facets than just the sexual element
I agree. Plus if I've built up a rapport with the person and told them some of my sexual like and dislikes, then if they send me a dirty PM, it'll be something that'll most certainly bump up my heart rate 110%, as opposed to me reading something from someone who doesn't know jack shit what what turns me on and off, and going "Ewwwww!"
So the dead chicken was too much? How about a live one, or maybe a duck?