The "insurrectionary theory" of the Second Amendment is nonsense

You're not changing the Constitution or the Bill of Rights. Sorry. We'll go to war over that.

You'll lose. And what's the big scary deal about changing the Constitution anyway? It has already been done 27 times, and the Constitution itself says we can.
 
You'll lose. And what's the big scary deal about changing the Constitution anyway? It has already been done 27 times, and the Constitution itself says we can.

So why don't you and the rest of the anti gun loonz just make the 2A go away? :confused:
 
Because nobody wants the 2nd A to go away. People want greater control yes but not to do way with the 2nd A. That's just right wing bullshit designed to prevent conversation from happening.
 
Because nobody wants the 2nd A to go away. People want greater control yes but not to do way with the 2nd A. That's just right wing bullshit designed to prevent conversation from happening.

You're saying the LW doesn't want to ban guns? Seriously?
 

That's an outright lie....there are numerous people on this board alone that want to ban guns and strongly advocate shit canning the 2A.

I can name numerous (D) politicians that want to ban guns, Feinstein, Obama, Clinton, Pelosi, Giffords, Bloomberg...should I go on?

I mean most don't try b/c they know they can't win that fight, not yet....but they have been quit clear...they don't think people should own guns....I'm willing to bet if you dig a bit you will find numerous quotes where they advocate only the state(military/cops) being armed.

Either that or I was right the first time and we don't actually have a LW which is probably the truer statement.

No we have a LW...they are all about "The Greater GOOD!!" and shitting on the individual for it in the process...we have plenty of that left wing yummy, shit tons of it.
 
So why don't you and the rest of the anti gun loonz just make the 2A go away? :confused:

Because 3/4 of the state legislatures will not vote to repeal it in your lifetime or mine. But, it's always fair play to argue in the courts for a narrow interpretation of it.
 
Because 3/4 of the state legislatures will not vote to repeal it in your lifetime or mine. But, it's always fair play to argue in the courts for a narrow interpretation of it.

Ahhhh can't vote it out so fuck the people and try to get a judge to shove it your way.....I'm not shocked.

Fuck america and it's people, anything to get your political team a win right KO?
 
Getting a judge involved is a legit technique. The people aren't always (or even usually) correct. That's the reason we have courts in the first fucking place and the reason we've had them for centuries. People are dangerously stupid.

That's an outright lie....there are numerous people on this board alone that want to ban guns and strongly advocate shit canning the 2A.

I can name numerous (D) politicians that want to ban guns, Feinstein, Obama, Clinton, Pelosi, Giffords, Bloomberg...should I go on?

I've never heard anybody on this board, certainly no American, advocate for the banning of guns. Not even something that could be sensibly translated into that. And yes you should go on. Giffords in particular should be interesting. She's the senator who got shot and then celebrated getting out of the hospital by watching her husband shoot skeet on their property. If that's your idea of someone who wants to ban guns then we need to get you a narrower definition cus she don't qualify.

I mean most don't try b/c they know they can't win that fight, not yet....but they have been quit clear...they don't think people should own guns....I'm willing to bet if you dig a bit you will find numerous quotes where they advocate only the state(military/cops) being armed.

Doubtful. They are Americans and we don't have that breed of people for better or worse. Just like our idea of socialist healthcare is mandates.



No we have a LW...they are all about "The Greater GOOD!!" and shitting on the individual for it in the process...we have plenty of that left wing yummy, shit tons of it.

They should be for the Greater Good. The fact that there are so many who are against it is disgusting. You shouldn't shit on the individual but sometimes that is just what has to happen and when that happens FUCK EM. FUCK EM HARD. FUCK EM OFTEN.
 
Ahhhh can't vote it out so fuck the people and try to get a judge to shove it your way.....I'm not shocked.

:rolleyes: Like I said, it's always fair game to argue in court for a reading of the Constitution, or of the statutory law or the case law, that is favorable to your own political agenda. All sides on all issues do it every chance they get. You know that. Everybody knows that.
 
Back
Top