Things that made you swear today.

Briefly, as I'm just not giving it more time. But the product of excuses and waisted time is a nut clencher.
 
Being given conflicting information about something very VERY important..damn it!! :mad:
 
Feeling like a bull dozer hit me after the sudden night shift.

Being on call again today.

Almost having to pull a double shift because SOME people can't get to work on time or don't call up when they can't get in!

Shit, fuck, CUNT!
 
Repeatedly falling on my ass at derby practice. Pretty sure I invented some new ones. ^^
 
lol I'd hip check you any day, sexy. Hell, I'll check you any where you'd like.
 
*catches you and winks*
If you wanted me to hold you all you had to do was ask.
 
Slipped on a patch of black ice and twisted my knee. Okay, I didn't swear, but there was an 8 year old watching and laughing.
 
Slipped on a patch of black ice and twisted my knee. Okay, I didn't swear, but there was an 8 year old watching and laughing.

At which point you swear at the kid. They have it coming, the universe will forgive you in the long run.
 
Okay so I'm really bored and I find out that there's some messed up artistic movie about Mr. Hands. You know the guy who died by horse cock. So I look it up and there it is on youtube. The movie is at best a yawn fest but beautiful and disturbing. So I figure these videos have to have some interesting comments. I scroll through and see the normal condemnation of it, but then there's some crazy bastard on there justifying it with empty illogical arguments as to how animals can consent to sex with humans. So I figure..why not check this fucker out? See if he's a troll or a genuine zoophile. You guys wouldn't believe the level of bullshit I viewed on that profile page.

This guy described how he can understand dogs and how he has an intimate relationship with them. What the fuck is wrong with people? So I check around and this fucker wrote the incredibly sympathetic article on Zoophilia for Wikipedia which states that the article needs and I quote..."needs attention from an expert on the subject."

Man I need a job...
 
Okay so I'm really bored and I find out that there's some messed up artistic movie about Mr. Hands. You know the guy who died by horse cock. So I look it up and there it is on youtube. The movie is at best a yawn fest but beautiful and disturbing. So I figure these videos have to have some interesting comments. I scroll through and see the normal condemnation of it, but then there's some crazy bastard on there justifying it with empty illogical arguments as to how animals can consent to sex with humans. So I figure..why not check this fucker out? See if he's a troll or a genuine zoophile. You guys wouldn't believe the level of bullshit I viewed on that profile page.

This guy described how he can understand dogs and how he has an intimate relationship with them. What the fuck is wrong with people? So I check around and this fucker wrote the incredibly sympathetic article on Zoophilia for Wikipedia which states that the article needs and I quote..."needs attention from an expert on the subject."

Man I need a job...


So I'm curious if this made you swear or smile.
 
So I'm curious if this made you swear or smile.

It made me swear. Those poor animals... Some people shouldn't own pets..

Also what the fuck Wikipedia? The founder was on the daily show the other day talking about how they're pretty good about providing factual information that is unbiased in nature. A dogfucker is writing about zoophilia. That hurts my head to think about. How many more ridiculously biased articles are floating around?
 
On the plus side, biased articles tend to get sorted relatively quickly. Someone posts something blatantly false or biased and it'll get fixed soon enough. Obviously the more frequented the page, the faster the fix and an obscure page could be wrong for months before someone notices it.

One of the benefits of community editing; even if some idiot vandalises a page or something, another community member can come along and fix it.
 
On the plus side, biased articles tend to get sorted relatively quickly. Someone posts something blatantly false or biased and it'll get fixed soon enough. Obviously the more frequented the page, the faster the fix and an obscure page could be wrong for months before someone notices it.

One of the benefits of community editing; even if some idiot vandalises a page or something, another community member can come along and fix it.

Yeah but apparently this topic hasn't really been touched scientifically and the studies that have been done have been mostly dismissed as pseudoscience. I can see why someone would not jump to be an expert in Bestiality.
 
Yeah but apparently this topic hasn't really been touched scientifically and the studies that have been done have been mostly dismissed as pseudoscience. I can see why someone would not jump to be an expert in Bestiality.

One could imagine it not looking good on a business card or resume' .....
 
Ah, now that I've looked at the page, I can see what you mean. Didn't realise you meant there was a "need expert" tag at the top of the page.
 
Ah, now that I've looked at the page, I can see what you mean. Didn't realise you meant there was a "need expert" tag at the top of the page.

Yeah I should have been more specific... Some dog banging douche wrote the article and not someone with a degree in human sexuality..
 
Yeah I should have been more specific... Some dog banging douche wrote the article and not someone with a degree in human sexuality..

Must have been written by Michael Vick's counterpart from the mirror universe.
 
Back
Top