Peregrinator
Hooded On A Hill
- Joined
- May 27, 2004
- Posts
- 89,482
She's the female Garbage Can.
I dunno about that, but she's certainly made it clear that she idolizes miles, of all the sleazy pricks to choose from.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
She's the female Garbage Can.
I dunno about that, but she's certainly made it clear that she idolizes miles, of all the sleazy pricks to choose from.
She's always been the same, anything any right wing scumbag does can be justified.
But throb aside, it doesn't explain why you still give support and kudos to Ken and Miles. Even if it were true that they didn't post robs info, the rest of the shit they have done is pretty sick. Especially Ken. How can you not condem something like that?This is true.
Throb's "story" is ever-evolving and after the fact.
Because "someone" posted "his personal information" it made all his previous attacks on people's families permissible...
... and all following attacks mandatory in every discussion where his first post is not declared the "winning" post.
In fairness to AJ, whilst I don't quite understand why he's defending miles and kkk/Ken, his antipathy to RDS is understandable. Robs comments about his daughter are racist and pretty sick. And as far as I know, unlike most of the RWingnuts, AJ has never posted personal info or made personal attacks on others children.
But throb aside, it doesn't explain why you still give support and kudos to Ken and Miles. Even if it were true that they didn't post robs info, the rest of the shit they have done is pretty sick. Especially Ken. How can you not condem something like that?
This I agree with and have said before myself.
Perg, do you know how fucking hard it is to get me and Petey to agree on anything including the square footage of his single-wide?
His edited post and the circumstances surrounding it are highly questionable.
His explanations are weak and almost impossible to believe.
Yet you blindly defend him to the bitter end.
You are sleeping with dogs and waking with fleas.
But throb aside, it doesn't explain why you still give support and kudos to Ken and Miles. Even if it were true that they didn't post robs info, the rest of the shit they have done is pretty sick. Especially Ken. How can you not condem something like that?
And this is the problem. You will defend any tactic used by one of the other wingnuts.
You may think it shows allegiance, but it does not. It shows a lack of character on your part.
Do you know how fucking hard it is to get me to agree with Rob and SeanH and disagree with Miles and vetteman?
You aren't going to find the "proof" of the things posted about Rob's kid because he had Laurel get rid of it from the GB. I don't understand why it is so hard to believe that it WAS there and Laurel took it down for a reason.
Despite talk of cybering with dudes, I think the conservative faction on the board mainly supports Ken because of his politics. If he's taken down, that's seen as aid and comfort to the liberals. You don't seem to feel the same way.
Because of this....
Woof!
Despite talk of cybering with dudes, I think the conservative faction on the board mainly supports Ken because of his politics. If he's taken down, that's seen as aid and comfort to the liberals. You don't seem to feel the same way.
I agree, he ought to come clean and in time he'd be seen as a loveable rogue who pulled the wool over our eyes.If Ken posted as Ken and talked politics on the board, I may actually agree with him. I don't know because I generally avoided KK threads. Personally, that's what I think Ken should do. Post as himself from now on (and not the Ken Kraft that someone already made up for humor.) He'll take heat for having had Karen Kraft in his past, but I'd judge him going forward on his posts then. Not the posts of the past.
I like to think I don't support someone, or disagree with someone, just because of their politics. I really don't see the KK outing as a political issue at all.
My question was "why".
And this is the problem. You will defend any tactic used by one of the other wingnuts.
You may think it shows allegiance, but it does not. It shows a lack of character on your part.
I think Ken or Skyskyleer were in the marines.
If Ken posted as Ken and talked politics on the board, I may actually agree with him. I don't know because I generally avoided KK threads. Personally, that's what I think Ken should do. Post as himself from now on (and not the Ken Kraft that someone already made up for humor.) He'll take heat for having had Karen Kraft in his past, but I'd judge him going forward on his posts then. Not the posts of the past.
I like to think I don't support someone, or disagree with someone, just because of attheir politics. I really don't see the KK outing as a political issue at all.
I agree, he ought to come clean and in time he'd be seen as a loveable rogue who pulled the wool over our eyes.
I agree, he ought to come clean and in time he'd be seen as a loveable rogue who pulled the wool over our eyes.
It's about tribal loyalty and the Reagan Principle.Ha!
Semper Lie!
It's not a political issue, unless you're a dogmatic winger who can't think for himself.
Ha! Maybe somebody oughta start a never-ending KK thread like "Describe the 64-year-old Fatso Impersonating a Slender Angel above you in one word."
It's about tribal loyalty and the Reagan Principle.
I don't know about loveable. I'd still find the fake rape stories, the victim story solicitation and the screaming racism pretty gross.
It'd be one thing if his fake persona had been a bubbly cheerleader who just loved to suck cock and play tennis, as opposed to...the vile mess that KK was.