Thanks for promoting my cause Mr Weasel. But then again I should say get a life coward; you don’t even have the balls to say who you are. You most probably don’t find anything about yourself that’s worthy to write home about
Training a Sub (both male and female)
- Thread starter lana316
- Start date
Thanks for promoting my cause Mr Weasel. But then again I should say get a life coward; you don’t even have the balls to say who you are. You most probably don’t find anything about yourself that’s worthy to write home about
key word is almost, even on the "inferior" portion.
It’s not a waste of time at all; it’s a free choice of win-win situation. I enjoy a lot from what I get from the sub and from what I give her and see her growing her sexual capacity and developing her sexual skills and personality. On her turn she gets lots of erotic and sexual fulfillment from being in the position to live and experience her need of giving and serving in all aspects of the relationship, and this gives her her sense of worth; her sense of existence.
My purpose is not hurting or demeaning; my purpose is the same as hers sharing and enjoying. It’s just like Yin en Yan, a dom and a sub are complementary for each other.
Stella_Omega
No Gentleman
- Joined
- Jul 14, 2005
- Posts
- 39,700
I'm figuring English is not your first language, huh?
There very well might be women/ subs like that out there, but I'd hope their sense of worth would be derived from something else.
Oh, so you're demeaning only to your fellow posters?
He's studied it, the profile says. Although, I'm guessing he failed, or didn't perform well at all. Sorry, k9, but your posts don't indicate a mastery of the language...not even much of a good approximation thereof. Mind you, I know, 'cause English is not my first language either.
ETA: your username is karma...and yet you act like an ass. What do you expect in return, bud?
Well then *shakes your hand* you have done a beautiful job =)
Multumesc!
OOOOH.. SMART!So, is that what makes you tik
Nah, bro. You've managed to turn her off.
Stella_Omega
No Gentleman
- Joined
- Jul 14, 2005
- Posts
- 39,700
double post...
Last edited:
Not just turn off. Make me angry. I hate insensitive apes that do not have any understanding of true caring or good relationships as well as not observing common courtesy.
CutieMouse
Meticulously Flighty
- Joined
- Apr 7, 2004
- Posts
- 8,493
If you enjoy what you receive [from a submissive lover], logic would presume what she gives is of value; therefore, she cannot be "worthless".
I'd also put forth that submissive-types who wrap their entire sense of existence/worth up in their lover, aren't necessarily submissive... co-dependent, yes; submissive, no.
I do, however, agree that a dominant-type and submissive-type are often simply opposite sides of the same coin.
You put up a few posts about blowing vamp cock and all of a sudden you're a blowhard. Sheesh!Blowhard newbies. Gotta love 'em.
Errr...that was not aimed (only) at me, wuz it?
Now, now. No reason to insult apes!
Gotta ask- did you study econ?
Thank you for saying this. I wanted to say something similar (well, far less psych-ey) but felt like I might talking out of my ass.
CutieMouse
Meticulously Flighty
- Joined
- Apr 7, 2004
- Posts
- 8,493
Gotta ask- did you study econ?
Ye gods no. Econ has too much mathematical sorts of thingies in it for someone like me to enjoy the labor... I'm simply more pragmatic than is good for me. LOL
Co-dependent emo-submissives who go "OMG he didn't text me today I'm going through sub-drop!" / "Your pleasure is my pleasure [I shall now remove my brain less utilizing my own opinions label me unsubmissive]" drive me batty... although, those sorts never seem at a loss for lovers, and I usually am, so what do I know? LOL
Stella_Omega
No Gentleman
- Joined
- Jul 14, 2005
- Posts
- 39,700
You made my day, bye for now
Blowhard newbies, gotta love em.
Ahh, see?
If you had some econ training, you'd do a marginal cost/marginal benefit type of analysis, and determine how crazy you should be for an optimal number of lovers.
That was bad of me. I'm sorry. And, you're right: "Ye gods no" at econ math. It's just...evil.
CutieMouse
Meticulously Flighty
- Joined
- Apr 7, 2004
- Posts
- 8,493
Ahh, see?
If you had some econ training, you'd do a marginal cost/marginal benefit type of analysis, and determine how crazy you should be for an optimal number of lovers.
That was bad of me. I'm sorry. And, you're right: "Ye gods no" at econ math. It's just...evil.
Yes, but then I'd have to factor in the cost/benefit of things like triple[+] penetration + mindfucks + humiliation (while factoring in time management for things like work and errands and parenting) to reach the ideal number of lovers, and that kinda math is waaaaaaaaaaay beyond me. I never even survived Algebra in high school much less higher mathematics. LOL
