Trump Triumphs

[AceDesSpades]

When your message is one of division, you are right to claim that division lost your place in the message queue...

 

[jomar]

No they didn't. Wall St, Silicon Valley and the war machine were near unanimously team Kamala. THE CHENEYS, along with Blackrock, JP Morgan and Goldman Sachs are the proud comrades of the DNC and hardcore Orange Hitler haters. Where have you been for the last 6 years??

Did you notice the shock market was up after trump won? Can you guess why?

Trump was good for the working and middle class too....and that likely won't change either. And there isn't much more out there that infuriates Democrats more than seeing the average American do well for themselves .....poor things won't have the power to force the sub human blue collar "it's" they hate so much to lick their boots and pay for their university "education" LOL.

How was trump good for the working and middle class? He gave them a temporary tax break while companies, who are people too, a permanent tax break. As for the rest of your post…pfft.

 

[UltraChad]

Did you notice the shock market was up after trump won? Can you guess why?


How was trump good for the working and middle class? He gave them a temporary tax break while companies, who are people too, a permanent tax break. As for the rest of your post…pfft.

Probably because now that a communist regime won't be doing everything it can to destroy the economy they have more faith in the economy and are willing to invest. I know I did!!

He let us keep more of our money and encouraged us to make more for ourselves ....that's significantly better than what the INCREASED tax and wage slavery and wild HATE for anyone that tries to better themselves that democrats are offering.

Cope harder with the loss commie.

 

[AceDesSpades]

No need to Guess.

It was uncertainty. Once things were certain, there was a lot of pent-up investment demand waiting to make smarter bets.

 

[AceDesSpades]

Probably because now that a communist regime won't be doing everything it can to destroy the economy they have more faith in the economy and are willing to invest. I know I did!!

He let us keep more of our money....that's significantly better than what the INCREASED tax and wage slavery that democrats are offering.

I reiterate, it was not a political decision, it was an economic decision that was independent of party affiliation.

 

[UltraChad]

There is certainly no more of that in the Scandinavian nations, Ireland, etc., than here.

None of them outrank the U.S. on the Index of Economic Freedom.

They literally all do, go read the IEF's rankings.

https://www.heritage.org/index/pages/all-country-scores

USA has been dropping since about 09.....when progressives REALLY started to attack the economy....now we're like 27 or something down the list because 1/2 the country now hates any sort of economic freedom and thinks destroying others ability to produce goods and services is "PROGRESS" LOL

 

[UltraChad]

I reiterate, it was not a political decision, it was an economic decision that was independent of party affiliation.

And water is wet!!!

Can't separate politics from economics. Politics is almost entirely about economic control. That is across the board too.... regardless of the political or economic systems in play or geographic location.

 

[jomar]

Probably because now that a communist regime won't be doing everything it can to destroy the economy they have more faith in the economy and are willing to invest. I know I did!!

If by commie regime you mean regulations that are in the best interest of people and not companies, then sure.

He let us keep more of our money and encouraged us to make more for ourselves

He gave us a feel good temporary tax break.

....that's significantly better than what the INCREASED tax and wage slavery and wild HATE for anyone that tries to better themselves that democrats are offering.

Good to know you’re against a living wage.

No need to Guess.

It was uncertainty. Once things were certain, there was a lot of pent-up investment demand waiting to make smarter bets.

Not so much. See above.

 

[AceDesSpades]

I made that point [separation] before there was a "safe space" lounge...

... I was shouted down.

emphatically

It's the economy stupid and economics dominate our lives, but politics do not, so the two should not be confused. Economics is reality and you cannot deny the results of ignoring reality, but politically, that is quite a safe act. Unless, of course, orange Hitler is on the ballot, right? Dictator. mandated abortion. tariff wars. nuclear winter (during a glowball warning), in which case the economy is the least of your worries.

Vote for the person least qualified economically because personality-wise, you can relate.
Unless you're white or an Uncle Tom, left the plantation, off da reservation...,
We only want people whose minds are right.

 

[Rightguide]

How Trump’s election could fortify a conservative Supreme Court majority​

ByKaelan Deese

November 7, 2024 7:00 am
.
President-elect Donald Trump could have a chance to solidify the Supreme Court’s Republican-appointed majority for decades to come after he was elected to a second term in the White House on Tuesday.

Several of the high court’s Republican-appointed justices are in their 70s and may be tempted to retire with a Republican in the White House for the next four years. That decision would not change the balance of power on the court but could give Trump, who appointed three justices in his first term, an opportunity to extend the longevity of its 6-3 conservative majority.

“If Justices Clarence Thomas and Sam Alito retire and Trump appoints their replacements … Trump will have appointed a majority of the court — the most since Franklin D. Roosevelt,” said Chris Geidner, publisher of the Law Dork newsletter, noting Roosevelt was able to secure five appointees to the high court.

“I would bet the farm that both Alito and Thomas will step down in the next year or two, and Donald Trump will get to appoint their replacement,” Sen. Susan Collins (R-ME) told Roll Call, adding those successors will be at least as conservative “but 30 years younger.”

More here:https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/...election-conservative-supreme-court-majority/

Good news for American and the Constitution.

 

[HisArpy]

​

How Trump’s election could fortify a conservative Supreme Court majority​

ByKaelan Deese

November 7, 2024 7:00 am
.
President-elect Donald Trump could have a chance to solidify the Supreme Court’s Republican-appointed majority for decades to come after he was elected to a second term in the White House on Tuesday.

Several of the high court’s Republican-appointed justices are in their 70s and may be tempted to retire with a Republican in the White House for the next four years. That decision would not change the balance of power on the court but could give Trump, who appointed three justices in his first term, an opportunity to extend the longevity of its 6-3 conservative majority.

“If Justices Clarence Thomas and Sam Alito retire and Trump appoints their replacements … Trump will have appointed a majority of the court — the most since Franklin D. Roosevelt,” said Chris Geidner, publisher of the Law Dork newsletter, noting Roosevelt was able to secure five appointees to the high court.

“I would bet the farm that both Alito and Thomas will step down in the next year or two, and Donald Trump will get to appoint their replacement,” Sen. Susan Collins (R-ME) told Roll Call, adding those successors will be at least as conservative “but 30 years younger.”

More here:https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/...election-conservative-supreme-court-majority/

Good news for American and the Constitution.

Don't forget about Sotomayor. If she steps down, along with Thomas and Alito, Trump will have appointed SIX, beating FDR's record instead of tying it.

 

[SimonDoom]

Don't forget about Sotomayor. If she steps down, along with Thomas and Alito, Trump will have appointed SIX, beating FDR's record instead of tying it.

What do you mean "along with Thomas and Alito"? Thomas was appointed by George HW Bush and Alito was appointed by George W. Bush. If Trump appoints a replacement for Sotomayor he will appoint 4, not 6.

Edit: I see what you are saying. You are assuming Thomas and Alito will retire so Trump can replace them. I think that's highly unlikely. I think Thomas wants to stick it out so he can be the longest-serving justice of all time. Alito isn't that old and I suspect he wants to continue serving for a while. It's unlikely Trump will replace either of them.

 

[HisArpy]

What do you mean "along with Thomas and Alito"? Thomas was appointed by George HW Bush and Alito was appointed by George W. Bush. If Trump appoints a replacement for Sotomayor he will appoint 4, not 6.

If Thomas and Alito retire along with Sotomayor, it'll be 6.

 

[SimonDoom]

If Thomas and Alito retire along with Sotomayor, it'll be 6.

I didn't catch that at first, but figured it out right before you replied.

Maybe, but I doubt they'll retire. I think it's too tempting for justices to stick around and do the job. It's a lot of power. Thomas has a very realistic shot at becoming the all time longest serving Supreme Court Justice, and I imagine he will be tempted to try for that. Alito isn't old by modern Supreme Court justice standards. It's hard for me to imagine, unless they are ill, that they would want to step down in the next two years.

 

[HisArpy]

I didn't catch that at first, but figured it out right before you replied.

Maybe, but I doubt they'll retire. I think it's too tempting for justices to stick around and do the job. It's a lot of power. Thomas has a very realistic shot at becoming the all time longest serving Supreme Court Justice, and I imagine he will be tempted to try for that. Alito isn't old by modern Supreme Court justice standards. It's hard for me to imagine, unless they are ill, that they would want to step down in the next two years.

They're smart. While they're also obsessed with their own infallibility, they're also aware that they only have 4 years before the tide potentially switches again. And, hopefully, they're aware that they personally don't all have 8 more years.

Sotomayor might try to stick it out but she's got health problems and diabetes and old age don't mix well even with the best health care available to lean on.

Alito and Thomas should pick their successors and suggest them as replacements before they bow out gracefully.

 

[icanhelp1]

If by commie regime you mean regulations that are in the best interest of people and not companies, then sure.


He gave us a feel good temporary tax break.


Good to know you’re against a living wage.


Not so much. See above.

Self reliance, accountability and equal opportunity make our country stronger.

Companies create jobs that enhance our economy not more government jobs.

 

[SimonDoom]

They're smart. While they're also obsessed with their own infallibility, they're also aware that they only have 4 years before the tide potentially switches again. And, hopefully, they're aware that they personally don't all have 8 more years.

Sotomayor might try to stick it out but she's got health problems and diabetes and old age don't mix well even with the best health care available to lean on.

Alito and Thomas should pick their successors and suggest them as replacements before they bow out gracefully.

Maybe they should. I doubt they will.

 

[jomar]

Self reliance, accountability and equal opportunity make our country stronger.

Companies create jobs that enhance our economy not more government jobs.

Nice pivot to something I wasn’t talking about.

 

[icanhelp1]

Nice pivot to something I wasn’t talking about.

You eluded to regulations for the people, I just pointed out to you that companies creat jobs and that over-regulations kill jobs. I thought you were capable of connecting the dots. Democrats love to stifle job creation by over-regulation. Dems also love to tax companies to oblivion.

 

[Rightguide]

Don't forget about Sotomayor. If she steps down, along with Thomas and Alito, Trump will have appointed SIX, beating FDR's record instead of tying it.

Looks like Trump determine the make-up of the court for decades to come.

 

[Rightguide]

Republicans just picked of their fourth new Senator. Bob Casey was defeated in Ohio by Dave McCormick. More good news.

 

[Politruk]

Probably because now that a communist regime

You really are an idiot!

 

[ll74]

Republicans just picked of their fourth new Senator. Bob Casey was defeated in Ohio by Dave McCormick. More good news.

Wrong state dipshit

 

[UltraChad]

If by commie regime you mean regulations that are in the best interest of people and not companies, then sure.


He gave us a feel good temporary tax break.


Good to know you’re against a living wage.


Not so much. See above.

If by "in the best interest of people not companies" you mean eliminating private property by turning it all into a government rental controlled by 180 alphabet agencies and 900 TRILLION PAGES of microprint regulations the way most Democrats do ....then sure.

He gave the working class a temporary tax break yes, which is more than the Democrats have done.

Not at all, I'm against the government telling people what a "living wage" is, something no leftoid is ever able to define.

 

[UltraChad]

You really are an idiot!

Hit a comrades nerve. Facts have a way of doing that.