Underage Characters In Erotic Stories

[lovecraft68]

I've stopped trying to make the point but that is my point. I write autobiographical stories. I'd like to be able to give context to my behaviour and not jusy have people assume that someone pressed 'slut' on my remote control then took out the batteries.

I was groomed online and abused at an age I'm not allowed to mention. That had a major impact on my sexuality. But heaven forbid we ever have a serious discussion about anything like that. Shit, nobody's even allowed to admit that they masturbated before they were 18. Which of course none of us did.

But as a consolation prize you can talk about rape, torture and all manner of violence here and on story side no problem.

Keep in mind, this isn't about laws, but what the site wants/doesn't want, and for those who care to listen, their preferences speak volumes.

As for your experiences, you're better off not discussing them here because on the forum someone will mansplain to you how you had it coming, or just call you a liar (doesn't help we have had a couple of those here in the past) and behind the scenes your PM box will be filled with people asking for details because its hot.

 

[Lucy_Lastic]

Don't forget incest. I can write a story about being raped by my dad as long as I'm over 18 when it happens.

 

[lovecraft68]

Don't forget incest. I can write a story about being raped by my dad as long as I'm over 18 when it happens.

You can, but I/T does have the rep of condemning such stories. My theory being most of us who enjoy the fantasy of taboo know in real life its usually abuse and don't want an intrusion of reality. But to your point you can write it. Or better yet, the entire mind control category is rape because no one in those stories can give consent.

And then we have BTB loving wives' stories that break a multitude of rules, but always see the light of day.

But do not-and I cannot stress this enough-mention a French Kiss at 16.

 

[alohadave]

You fuck clown weirdos?

Shooter Mcgavin: No. (runs off in shame)

 

[Booboobear84]

I've stopped trying to make the point but that is my point. I write autobiographical stories. I'd like to be able to give context to my behaviour and not jusy have people assume that someone pressed 'slut' on my remote control then took out the batteries.

I was groomed online and abused at an age I'm not allowed to mention. That had a major impact on my sexuality. But heaven forbid we ever have a serious discussion about anything like that. Shit, nobody's even allowed to admit that they masturbated before they were 18. Which of course none of us did.

I implied underage on Reddit in something biographical and got booted from the sub reddit without even a warning. Underage is considered a real third rail in the US. In fairness the problem is the legitimate discussion of underage is the thin edge of the wedge that would open the site to stuff that might start heading toward encouraging not OK underage stuff, and then you can't get the genie back into the bottle.

It's incredibly unfortunate that legitimate discussion is held hostage to this.

 

[KRey32]

Don’t forget that what was taboo yesterday may not be tomorrow. Times change as do attitudes. I had a “relationship” with a married mother of three teacher in my high school for a year and a half. I won’t tell how old I was for obvious reasons. When it blew up (and man did it ever blow up) I was vilified as some kind of immoral POS and she was simply fired. If it had happened today she would be in jail and I would be in therapy. I feel no sense of having been violated or forced against my will. But nevertheless I probably could not write the story on here.

 

[SimonDoom]

Don't forget incest. I can write a story about being raped by my dad as long as I'm over 18 when it happens.

Not if it violates the non-con rule. The incest stories at this site overwhelmingly feature consensual relationships involving adults.

I've read a gazillion incest stories at Literotica and I can't recall one that involved a woman being raped by her father.

 

[lovecraft68]

Not if it violates the non-con rule. The incest stories at this site overwhelmingly feature consensual relationships involving adults.

I've read a gazillion incest stories at Literotica and I can't recall one that involved a woman being raped by her father.

Again, you are taking sarcasm as an actual statement in your rush to come crashing in with "This site would never and there's a rule and..."

Give it a rest about the Non con rule. We all know its a joke just by the existence of the MC category and the fact the site-who says no non con stories has a non con category.

You should look into changing your name to Karen Doom.

 

[SimonDoom]

Again, you are taking sarcasm as an actual statement in your rush to come crashing in with "This site would never and there's a rule and..."

Give it a rest about the Non con rule. We all know its a joke just by the existence of the MC category.

You should look into changing your name to Karen Doom.

I drink your milkshake.

 

[Bramblethorn]

Not if it violates the non-con rule. The incest stories at this site overwhelmingly feature consensual relationships involving adults.

I've read a gazillion incest stories at Literotica and I can't recall one that involved a woman being raped by her father.

I don't know if Lit still accepts NC incest, but it certainly used to, including father-daughter.

https://www.literotica.com/s/the-neglected-son-ch-04?page=2
https://www.literotica.com/s/daddy-wouldnt-dare
https://www.literotica.com/s/the-ravishing-of-constance-ch-01

 

[lovecraft68]

I don't know if Lit still accepts NC incest, but it certainly used to, including father-daughter.

https://www.literotica.com/s/the-neglected-son-ch-04?page=2
https://www.literotica.com/s/daddy-wouldnt-dare
https://www.literotica.com/s/the-ravishing-of-constance-ch-01

Way back lit had a sister site that had extreme stories that was absorbed into Lit. They used-and still use this-as an excuse to why there's some old stories like that floating around.

But that has nothing to do with all the new ones.

 

[CherryCupcake]

People can love sex and not seek any sexual contact with children. Children do come from fucking and adults can both fuck and love their kids. They key is there be no action whatsoever including children. And frankly, I would love to see an end to incest stories.

 

[MillieDynamite]

My guess is that's not gonna happen on this site.

People can love sex and not seek any sexual contact with children. Children do come from fucking and adults can both fuck and love their kids. They key is there be no action whatsoever including children. And frankly, I would love to see an end to incest stories.

 

[Bramblethorn]

Way back lit had a sister site that had extreme stories that was absorbed into Lit. They used-and still use this-as an excuse to why there's some old stories like that floating around.

But that has nothing to do with all the new ones.

Looks like there are plenty of stories tagged "nonconsent" still being posted in I/T: https://search.literotica.com/?query=nonconsent&categories=9&period=1 year&where=tags&page=1

 

[KRey32]

I read one of the stories referenced above and it certainly seemed like NC incest to me. The issue at hand is whether or not such stories are allowed (or were previously) on Lit. But it brought up for me the whole issue of what constitutes consent. The two men in the story seemed to think that her rather involuntary physical reactions to what they were doing to her constituted consent or even more, enjoyment. I found that troubling. I am sure someone on here will set me straight if my thinking needs to be adjusted. I realize it is fiction and if I am honest the fantasy was somewhat arousing to me. However, I couldn’t help but put myself in the place of the woman involved. But I digress. This is a probably a subject for a different thread.

 

[alohadave]

I don't understand what the problem with nonconsent in I/T is. What makes incest and nonconsent incompatible or worse than regular nonconsent?

 

[Kasumi_Lee]

I read one of the stories referenced above and it certainly seemed like NC incest to me. The issue at hand is whether or not such stories are allowed (or were previously) on Lit. But it brought up for me the whole issue of what constitutes consent. The two men in the story seemed to think that her rather involuntary physical reactions to what they were doing to her constituted consent or even more, enjoyment. I found that troubling. I am sure someone on here will set me straight if my thinking needs to be adjusted. I realize it is fiction and if I am honest the fantasy was somewhat arousing to me. However, I couldn’t help but put myself in the place of the woman involved. But I digress. This is a probably a subject for a different thread.

You're not wrong. Involuntary physical reactions definitely do NOT constitute consent. Lit rules surrounding NC/R content require that the victim derive some pleasure from the assault, which does soften the impact of the story into more of a dubious consent fantasy, but at the same time it kind of muddies the waters because in the real world many SA victims do become physically aroused during the assault. A thrusting penis is still a thrusting penis regardless of whether or not its owner has permission to be inside you.

 

[MillieDynamite]

Rapists want the woman to climax, not because it proves their sexual prowess, but instead because they instinctively know it increases the shame she experiences. It's also a convenient loophole for the rape stories here. And, in real life, it happens that rape involuntarily orgasm. It didn't happen to me, but it did to others I know.

I read one of the stories referenced above and it certainly seemed like NC incest to me. The issue at hand is whether or not such stories are allowed (or were previously) on Lit. But it brought up for me the whole issue of what constitutes consent. The two men in the story seemed to think that her rather involuntary physical reactions to what they were doing to her constituted consent or even more, enjoyment. I found that troubling. I am sure someone on here will set me straight if my thinking needs to be adjusted. I realize it is fiction and if I am honest the fantasy was somewhat arousing to me. However, I couldn’t help but put myself in the place of the woman involved. But I digress. This is a probably a subject for a different thread.

 

[OverconfidentSarcasm]

But it brought up for me the whole issue of what constitutes consent. The two men in the story seemed to think that her rather involuntary physical reactions to what they were doing to her constituted consent or even more, enjoyment. I found that troubling. I am sure someone on here will set me straight if my thinking needs to be adjusted. I realize it is fiction and if I am honest the fantasy was somewhat arousing to me. However, I couldn’t help but put myself in the place of the woman involved. But I digress. This is a probably a subject for a different thread.

No, nothing you wrote is wrong. But, sadly, it is a recurring theme that many "authors" on here do not understand basic bodily functions. My personal favorite is reading first-time stories, where the MMC sinks half his dick into the virgin woman before hitting her hymen. I always wonder whether these authors just transcribed a porn scene, or if they wanted to tell readers just HOW small the guy's penis was supposed to be.

On a less amusing note, though, I had discussions with authors writing pretty hardcore cuckold-humiliation-rape stuff on here, and some of them were genuinely convinced that men can not get hard unless they're physically stimulated. At first, I smirked at that just as I smirked at the virgin stories, thinking these authors just transcribed what they saw in porn movies (where the actors are usually so desensitized they need fluffers to work), but, by now, I think there are more alarming reasons for their beliefs.