DeluxAuto
AntiSocial Extrovert
- Joined
- Dec 16, 2010
- Posts
- 16,056
I did. Twice. And at no point does he explain how his tarrifs will benefit Americans.You said you already watched
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I did. Twice. And at no point does he explain how his tarrifs will benefit Americans.You said you already watched
It's obvious that icant understands tariffs even less than trump.The “Great One” went to long length to explain tarriffs and their protectionist history
from McKinley through Reagan
Reagan threatened to or did put tariffs on Japanese motorcycles to protect Harley Davidson
Trump threatened Harley Davidson with tariffs for thinking about a foreign factory
At no point did the “Great One” say that tariffs raised money from the foreign producer! That is purely ‘rump’s poor understanding of what the fuck he is doing
Tariffs on all foreign goods? Even those installed in American products ?? How much do you buy that will be affected? How much already WAS affected?? Any American goods? You think they don’t inch their prices up to the new market price ? Do you understand capitalism??
Never mind the effect on world shipping and supply lines
It's obvious you don't understand how tarrifs work. I also didn't say I agree with all of Trump's tarrif policies. One of Trump's pet policies is protecting the US auto industry. During his interview he did promise to go after Chinese autos built in Mexico. If elected he threatened to impose a 100% tarrif on all Chinese cars manufactured in Mexico. That threat halted the building of a huge super modern Chinese funded auto plant till after the elections. Tariffs don't have to be implemented to be effected.It's obvious that icant understands tariffs even less than trump.
None of this diatribe details how trump's tariffs would work to the benefit of Americans nor does it let us know that you know how tariffs work.It's obvious you don't understand how tarrifs work. I also didn't say I agree with all of Trump's tarrif policies. One of Trump's pet policies is protecting the US auto industry. During his interview he did promise to go after Chinese autos built in Mexico. If elected he threatened to impose a 100% tarrif on all Chinese cars manufactured in Mexico. That threat halted the building of a huge super modern Chinese funded auto plant till after the elections. Tariffs don't have to be implemented to be effected.
How did threatening to make Mexico pay for the wall work out?Tariffs don't have to be implemented to be effected.
It's obvious you don't understand how tarrifs work. I also didn't say I agree with all of Trump's tarrif policies. One of Trump's pet policies is protecting the US auto industry. During his interview he did promise to go after Chinese autos built in Mexico. If elected he threatened to impose a 100% tarrif on all Chinese cars manufactured in Mexico. That threat halted the building of a huge super modern Chinese funded auto plant till after the elections. Tariffs don't have to be implemented to be effected.
He used the word "bloodbath". I honestly do not recall anyone claiming he was directly calling for his supporters to get violent. The catch is, he knows perfectly well he doesn't have to do that. He knows they're more than willing to go there. Under those circumstances, using a word like "bloodbath" is asking for trouble, regardless of the context.Again cite the complete narrative. How many times have you dumbfucks taken bloodbath out of context implying that if Trump loses the election there would be violence in the streets.
That one again? Fine, I'm listening. Please explain, in as much detail as you like, how anyone who chooses to march alongside avowed white supremacists and Nazis chanting "Jews will not replace us" could possibly be seen as a very fine person, even if they don't directly identify with those groups.Charlottesville comments taken out of context implying that Trump supported extreme left and extreme right wing ideology. You fucking democrats lie! LIE! LIE!
The speaker of the House does not have the authority to call in the National Guard. There's no way you could be unaware of that by now.I can't help it if you're misinformed. This event would never have happened had Pelosi and the Pentagon followed Trump's advise.
It wasn't unconstitutional, and the lack of more Republicans was entirely McCarthy's fault. He had the option of nominating any two of literally over a hundred other members, and instead he chose to take his marbles and go home.As far as what happened on J/6 I'll wait for the court proceedings to clarify things. So far Smith's legal brief is a pile of inadmissible hear say bullshit. Pelosi's unconstitutional sham kangaroo committee lacked credibility starting with the composition of the committee and the absence of cross examination.
According to Trump. Whose word is absolutely worthless.Trump gave senior Pentagon leadership directives to keep January 6 peaceful - including using the National Guard - which the Pentagon leaders ignored.
That's not what he was doing on that phone call. He was trying to dig up dirt on Biden, nothing more or less.Trump has an inherent responsibility to protect taxpayers money especially when it concerns fraud.
Deflection. Most left leaning media outlets literally accused Trump of promoting violence if he loses the election. You’re misinformed and suffering from TDS on steroids.He used the word "bloodbath". I honestly do not recall anyone claiming he was directly calling for his supporters to get violent. The catch is, he knows perfectly well he doesn't have to do that. He knows they're more than willing to go there. Under those circumstances, using a word like "bloodbath" is asking for trouble, regardless of the context.
It was debunked and Democrats were caught promoting lies and negative propaganda as usual.That one again? Fine, I'm listening. Please explain, in as much detail as you like, how anyone who chooses to march alongside avowed white supremacists and Nazis chanting "Jews will not replace us" could possibly be seen as a very fine person, even if they don't directly identify with those groups.
She doesn’t have the authority to cut orders for mobilization but she has the authority to request the Guard and Trump authorized the use. Just admit Pelosi fucked up.The speaker of the House does not have the authority to call in the National Guard. There's no way you could be unaware of that by now.
That’s your opinion. Pelosi overstepped congressional rules by refusing to allowed certain republicans on the committee, that makes the committee unconstitutional since the speaker didn’t follow the agreed upon rules. Don’t blame McCarthy for resisting Pelosi’s strong arm tactics. Pelosi wanted representatives that would align with her agenda.It wasn't unconstitutional, and the lack of more Republicans was entirely McCarthy's fault. He had the option of nominating any two of literally over a hundred other members, and instead he chose to take his marbles and go home.
TDSAccording to Trump. Whose word is absolutely worthless.
That your opinion. Trump suspected fraud concerning Biden’s son and he was spot on. Vindman was insubordinate to his boss by not following the chain of command. He was involved in a conspiracy against Trump. You’re blinded by TDS. There is a significant amount of compelling evidence to prove Trump was spot on but we have a corrupt AG who refuses to impanel a Grand jury to follow up on corruption allegations. Biden actually threatened to withhold funding if Shokin wasn’t fired. More rules for thee but not for me.That's not what he was doing on that phone call. He was trying to dig up dirt on Biden, nothing more or less.
I just gave you an example dumbass!!None of this diatribe details how trump's tariffs would work to the benefit of Americans nor does it let us know that you know how tariffs work.
Why are you so awful at answering simple direct questions?
Explain to me how Trump urging the deployment of NG troops 3 days prior to his rally could in any way imply he would overturn the government and destroy democracy? Tell me how democrats could construe urging Troops to the capital as an attempt at insurrection. Must be TDS on steroids.
I'm not going to waste my time explaining anything to somebody whose head is so far tucked up their ass that they actually support somebody who puts himself above the Constitution. That is the really raw core of it all.Explain to me how Trump urging the deployment of NG troops 3 days prior to his rally could in any way imply he would overturn the government and destroy democracy? Tell me how democrats could construe urging Troops to the capital as an attempt at insurrection. Must be TDS on steroids.
That wasn't even a concept of a plan, traitor. This isn't going well for you.I just gave you an example dumbass!!
Was this during our after his trial where he was convicted 34 times for fraud?Trump suspected fraud concerning Biden’s son
I'm surprise you can type with your head soooooo far up Kamy's ass.I'm not going to waste my time explaining anything to somebody whose head is so far tucked up their ass that they actually support somebody who puts himself above the Constitution. That is the really raw core of it all.
You propagandists talk yourself in circles and expect us to do the dance. Not going to happen.
But please keep telling us how much you don't hate and fear Democrats.
WASH, RINSE, SPIN, REPEAT.Was this during our after his trial where he was convicted 34 times for fraud?
I don't hate and fear democrats. Unfortunately you think you're liberal, not even close. You're a lemming incapable of thinking for yourself following the TDS crowd.I'm not going to waste my time explaining anything to somebody whose head is so far tucked up their ass that they actually support somebody who puts himself above the Constitution. That is the really raw core of it all.
You propagandists talk yourself in circles and expect us to do the dance. Not going to happen.
But please keep telling us how much you don't hate and fear Democrats.
WASH, RINSE, SPIN, REPEAT
Hint: It's not.One of Trump's pet policies is protecting the US auto industry. During his interview he did promise to go after Chinese autos built in Mexico. If elected he threatened to impose a 100% tarrif on all Chinese cars manufactured in Mexico.
Easy. He thought he could order the NG to march on the Capitol, on his behalf.Explain to me how Trump urging the deployment of NG troops 3 days prior to his rally could in any way imply he would overturn the government and destroy democracy?
Trump has a military liaison plus legal counsel and an AG that guide him in both military issues and legal issues. Military leadership are not obligated to obey an unlawful order, as a matter of fact they can be prosecuted under UCMJ for doing so.Easy. He thought he could order the NG to march on the Capitol, on his behalf.
Somebody may at some point have explained to him that was impossible. But not even you could possibly believe Trump would not have assumed that he could pull off a military coup successfully. He is that arrogant and that stupid, and you know it.
Trump has a military liaison plus legal counsel and an AG that guide him in both military issues and legal issues. Military leadership are not obligated to obey an unlawful order, as a matter of fact they can be prosecuted under UCMJ for doing so.
I wonder if it's all those black daddies living by the 4 fs ( find them, feel them, fuck them, forget them ).
blacks have a higher propensity of violence than all races combined.
I wouldn’t even think of walking a predominately black neighborhood, wouldn’t end well.
I'm surprise you can type with your head soooooo far up Kamy's ass.
I don't hate and fear democrats. Unfortunately you think you're liberal, not even close. You're a lemming incapable of thinking for yourself following the TDS crowd.