What the American people need to know about the Democratic Party machine ‘destroy democracy to save it’

[adrina]

*If necessary* implies that out of control criminal behavior exist. He, as president, is well within his authority to mobilize and federalize NG troops if a situation threatens our government or the safety of the American people.

Enemies from within is not something a president would mobilize troops for, that's handled by the DOJ. He misspoke, so what. I find it ironic that you hang on every word Trump says knowing full well that Trump often speaks from the cuff but his history demonstrates just the opposite.

Adam Schiff is a leftist radical nutbag as well as a liar. He tried to orchestrate a soft coup against the president of the US. He was instrumental in advancing a sham impeachment.

The NG was the part "if necessary". The US military had no such qualification.

You keep grasping at straws.

How do you know he misspoke? He didn't correct himself, he's offered no clarification. Using the phrase "enemies within" is damning. And all you can say he misspoke and anyone who displays concern is TDSg. Bullshit.

You keep saying Trump misspeaks. I think it's that you agree with him.

Schiff did not try to orchestrate a coup you traitor. Fuck you're not only anti-American you're an idiot.

 

[HisArpy]

weak

When all you have is projection, you should be aware that you're going to be called on it.

I'm still waiting on the proof.

 

[DeluxAuto]

I'm still waiting on the proof.

Promise to hold your breath?

 

[DeluxAuto]

The NG was the part "if necessary". The US military had no such qualification.

You keep grasping at straws.

How do you know he misspoke? He didn't correct himself, he's offered no clarification. Using the phrase "enemies within" is damning. And all you can say he misspoke and anyone who displays concern is TDSg. Bullshit.

You keep saying Trump misspeaks. I think it's that you agree with him.

Schiff did not try to orchestrate a coup you traitor. Fuck you're not only anti-American you're an idiot.

They are always interpreting his words.

WE KNOW WHY!

 

[Politruk]

Adam Schiff is a leftist radical nutbag as well as a liar. He tried to orchestrate a soft coup against the president of the US. He was instrumental in advancing a sham impeachment.

There was nothing sham about impeaching Trump for that call to Zelenskyy.

And there are NO leftist radicals in the Democratic Party, not even Bernie Sanders, if he even counts as a Dem.

Not even those few Dems who are members of the Democratic Socialists of America are leftist radicals.

 

[icanhelp1]

This event would not have happened had Trump peacefully turned over power to his legitimate successor and not promoted lies for months. The oath keepers specifically showed up to attack the Capitol and he knew this.

I don't believe Trump knew the Oath keepers would resort to violence. If it's proven that he did then let the chip fall where they may.

It was J/6 not J/20 The people have a right to petition their government, free speech, however, I agree things did get out of hand. Those who resorted to violence gave conservatives a black eye and that's unfortunate, they were criminally prosecuted. Without the violence the protest were perfectly legal and constitutional. Trump did turn over power peacefully. Trump had a right to challenge the elections, it happens quite often. We'll see what happens at the trial.

Instead of staging a rally to invite the base against the election results, he could have just done what every other President has done.

The 2020 election was like no other. Sates canvasing entire populations with mail in ballots is a recipe for fraud. Trump truly believes that the election results was suspicious at best, so don't I, especially in Penn. I believe many courts were derelict of their duty, hiding behind the excuse of standing. Some lawyers were unprepared but there were others that that had compelling evidence and worth evidentiary hearings. legitimate concerns.

Regardless of what defense was not there, the defense was needed because of the actions of the former President.

Trump urged an increase in law enforcement to ensure a peaceful protest. Why don't you on the left question that issue.

The way the DOJ handled it was abhorrent.

 

[adrina]

They are always interpreting his words.

WE KNOW WHY!

They need the Trumptranslator to Trumpsplain.

 

[icanhelp1]

There was nothing sham about impeaching Trump for that call to Zelenskyy.

Trump has an inherent responsibility to protect taxpayers money especially when it concerns fraud. By the way Trump was spot on!

LTC Vindman is a traitor

 

[DeluxAuto]

Trump has an inherent responsibility to protect taxpayers money especially when it concerns fraud. By the way Trump was spot on!

LTC Vindman is a traitor

Then why will his concept of an economic plan add $7 trillion to our debt? Who the fuck do you think ends up with the cost of tarrifs?

You're a traitor and an idiot.

 

[HisArpy]

Trump has an inherent responsibility to protect taxpayers money especially when it concerns fraud. By the way Trump was spot on!

LTC Vindman is a traitor

Correction; Vindman was insubordinate.

 

[DeluxAuto]

They need the Trumptranslator to Trumpsplain.

It's like a bad sci-fi movie where the protagonist uses his homemade translation device to decipher alien code.

 

[ll74]

I don't believe Trump knew the Oath keepers would resort to violence. If it's proven that he did then let the chip fall where they may.

It was J/6 not J/20 The people have a right to petition their government, free speech, however, I agree things did get out of hand. Those who resorted to violence gave conservatives a black eye and that's unfortunate, they were criminally prosecuted. Without the violence the protest were perfectly legal and constitutional. Trump did turn over power peacefully. Trump had a right to challenge the elections, it happens quite often. We'll see what happens at the trial.

The 2020 election was like no other. Sates canvasing entire populations with mail in ballots is a recipe for fraud. Trump truly believes that the election results was suspicious at best, so don't I, especially in Penn. I believe many courts were derelict of their duty, hiding behind the excuse of standing. Some lawyers were unprepared but there were others that that had compelling evidence and worth evidentiary hearings. legitimate concerns.

Trump urged an increase in law enforcement to ensure a peaceful protest. Why don't you on the left question that issue.

The way the DOJ handled it was abhorrent.

Trump continues to lie about the results of the election. Blame everyone else as you wish...without his bullshit, January 6 would not have happened.

I don't want to discuss why there wasn't enough force against assholes violently attacking the Capitol. I see that literally Mike Pence was the only reason that the peaceful transfer of power had a chance. And I see that he was dismissed because of that singular action.

 

[icanhelp1]

Correction; Vindman was insubordinate.

Not in my book

 

[icanhelp1]

Trump continues to lie about the results of the election. Blame everyone else as you wish...without his bullshit, January 6 would not have happened.

I don't want to discuss why there wasn't enough force against assholes violently attacking the Capitol. I see that literally Mike Pence was the only reason that the peaceful transfer of power had a chance. And I see that he was dismissed because of that singular action.

It dispels the idea of intent for violence.

 

[icanhelp1]

Then why will his concept of an economic plan add $7 trillion to our debt? Who the fuck do you think ends up with the cost of tarrifs?

You're a traitor and an idiot.

It's not my fault you're so gullible. He explained in his interview with Bloomberg how he would use tarrifs. If a country tarrifs us we tarrif back, that only fair, it's a tool to level the playing field.

 

[Politruk]

Trump has an inherent responsibility to protect taxpayers money especially when it concerns fraud.

That's no excuse for what he did -- making military aid to an endangered ally contingent on investigating a political opponent. That was treasonous. By strict constitutional definition, giving aid and comfort to the enemy.

 

[ll74]

It dispels the idea of intent for violence.

No it doesn't. There was a literal plan that people around Trump knew about, to reject the results and declare martial law.

But again, the only reason it had any momentum at all is because Trump knowingly rejected legitimate results.

If he would have conceded, none of this shit would've happened

You fuckers defend his blatant abuse of power like it means nothing to you... And you even want 4 more years of it.

There shouldn't have been a desire for supporters to attack the Capitol. They believe his lies.

 

[Politruk]

It dispels the idea of intent for violence.

There is absolutely no question that Trump intended the 1/6 mob to do violence. There was no other conceivable reason for them to be in Washington on that day. No peaceful protest was going to stop the certification.

 

[DeluxAuto]

He explained in his interview with Bloomberg how he would use tarrifs

He did? Please show us with the timestamp on the video.

Please?

 

[SevMax2]

Like it or not, Adam Schiff is likely going to be a Senator. It will just be interesting to see what he does with that. He's been very much a polarizing figure, as hated by Trumpers as he is beloved by Resistance types.

 

[Politruk]

LTC Vindman is a traitor

Not to the United States, he isn't.

That would be Trump.

 

[icanhelp1]

No it doesn't. There was a literal plan that people around Trump knew about, to reject the results and declare martial law.

But again, the only reason it had any momentum at all is because Trump knowingly rejected legitimate results.

If he would have conceded, none of this shit would've happened

You fuckers defend his blatant abuse of power like it means nothing to you... And you even want 4 more years of it.

There shouldn't have been a desire for supporters to attack the Capitol. They believe his lies.

I'll wait for the trial. Leaders say shit when in the company of their advisers and counsel. Some conversations are so ridiculous it's beyond believable. Those conversations should have been protected.

The DOJ, like usual, used gestapo type tactics to force privileged testimony. Pelosi's kangaroo committee was one sided and allowed their opinion to permeate throughout the media without a defense or cross examination. The legal brief that Chutkan just unsealed is a litany of hearsay bullshit.

Ill wait for the trial.

The impeachment brought to light what happened and Trump was not convicted regardless of what senators used for a reason to not convict.

The point that you refuse to take into consideration is that Trump authorized the use of NG and had they done that were not having this conversation. This insubordination of a Trump directive, whether you agree or not, is a cause and effect. Trump wanted a peaceful demonstration. Crowd phycology is difficult to predict. As I watch all the different videos I'm not convinced that the level of violence wasn't embellished by the media. It was an ugly day and it did hurt conservatives. The dems since J/6 have cast all conservatives guilty by association which is unfair. I'll leave it at that.

He did? Please show us with the timestamp on the video.

Please?

 

[icanhelp1]

He did? Please show us with the timestamp on the video.

Please?

 

[DeluxAuto]

Timestamp?

I've seen the video, you twit.

 

[ll74]

It dispels the idea of intent for violence.

Just adding, you've been here longer than most and you still suck at using the site.