What the American people need to know about the Democratic Party machine ‘destroy democracy to save it’

[HisArpy]

Again, what context makes it okay for him to say that he will send the US military after US citizens?

You do know that the National Guard has been used to quell civil unrest many many MANY times by leaders from both political parties, yes?

 

[Rotadom]

You do know that the National Guard has been used to quell civil unrest many many MANY times by leaders from both political parties, yes?

What civil unrest is trump talking about?

He's manufacturing outrage and nonsense scenarios to ignite his cult.

 

[adrina]

You do know that the National Guard has been used to quell civil unrest many many MANY times by leaders from both political parties, yes?

Thank you for your rationalization of trump saying he will use the US military against American citizens. Perhaps you can come forward where your comrade failed and provide the context in which Trump said this that makes it okay.

 

[icanhelp1]

Your claim wasn't that she supported a non profit bail reform organization.

Your claim is that all three women supported rioting.

What kind of a fucking message is sent to protestors when you promote a bail fund for criminals. Fuck off with your bullshit.

Waters called for protestors to get more confrontational if a no-guilty verdict is rendered. That's not only promoting violence it should have been prosecuted as a criminal violation ( jury tampering ).

Trump says go forward peacefully and patriotically and you democrats wanted his head on a spear for inciting an insurrection. Democrats lie!!!

 

[icanhelp1]

Thank you for your rationalization of trump saying he will use the US military against American citizens. Perhaps you can come forward where your comrade failed and provide the context in which Trump said this that makes it okay.

You really are stupid! How do you provide context for a hypothetical. *IF NECESSARY* IMPLIES AMERICAN CITIZENS OUT OF CONTROL, AMERICAN CITIZENS BREAKING THE LAW, CIVIL DIOBEDIENCE, You're just an argumentative old bitty. I'm out of here.

 

[adrina]

You really are stupid! How do you provide context for a hypothetical. *IF NECESSARY* IMPLIES AMERICAN CITIZENS OUT OF CONTROL, AMERICAN CITIZENS BREAKING THE LAW, CIVIL DIOBEDIENCE, You're just an argumentative old bitty. I'm out of here.

That's not what he said.

You've had the quote provided, where in it does he say anything about civil disobedience or breaking the law. The only thing he makes reference to is radical left lunatics and the enemies within.

If you cannot refrain from inserting what you believe he said vs what he actually said, then your entire argument is based on feelings not fact.

So again, what is the context that makes it okay for the president of the United States to turn the US military on the US citizens?

 

[Politruk]

You really are stupid! How do you provide context for a hypothetical. *IF NECESSARY* IMPLIES AMERICAN CITIZENS OUT OF CONTROL, AMERICAN CITIZENS BREAKING THE LAW, CIVIL DIOBEDIENCE, You're just an argumentative old bitty. I'm out of here.

The use of the NG was never justified to put down labor strikes in the 19th or 20th Centuries. Nor was it ever legitimate to use it against the Vietnam War protestors. Nor against the BLM demonstrations. How is what Trump is talking about any different?

The NG SHOULD have been used on 01/06/20 -- THAT was an actual INSURRECTION.

 

[ll74]

What kind of a fucking message is sent to protestors when you promote a bail fund for criminals. Fuck off with your bullshit.

It says that if you can't afford bail, that groups exists that can assist you. Not all who were arrested committed crimes.,

Waters called for protestors to get more confrontational if a no-guilty verdict is rendered. That's not only promoting violence it should have been prosecuted as a criminal violation ( jury tampering ).

She didn't promote rioting.

Trump says go forward peacefully and patriotically and you democrats wanted his head on a spear for inciting an insurrection. Democrats lie!!!

And then when they didn't, he waited three hours to tell them that he loved them.

 

[Rotadom]

Why do trump's cultists constantly have to interpret his crazy anti American rhetoric? He's a liar, traitor, and fraudster. All of which have been proven by his own words and actions as well as the courts.

 

[LLCox]

yes, lets talk about trump and project 2025

https://www.mississippifreepress.or...ful-tool-to-carry-out-his-agenda-on-u-s-soil/

 

[Politruk]

Why do trump's cultists constantly have to interpret his crazy anti American rhetoric? He's a liar, traitor, and fraudster. All of which have been proven by his own words and actions as well as the courts.

That's why they have to INTERPRET it.

 

[HisArpy]

Thank you for your rationalization of trump saying he will use the US military against American citizens. Perhaps you can come forward where your comrade failed and provide the context in which Trump said this that makes it okay.

As I said, use of the National Guard has been done by EVERY President when faced with domestic unrest. This is NORMAL and ACCEPTED in extraordinary circumstances and is ALLOWED under the law.

YOU attempting to limit this to Trump, and making it seem as if he's doing something illegal, only shows your desperation as Kamala fades in the polling and is likely to lose this election cycle.

 

[HisArpy]

yes, lets talk about trump and project 2025

https://www.mississippifreepress.or...ful-tool-to-carry-out-his-agenda-on-u-s-soil/

Trump has disavowed Project 2025.

https://www.c-span.org/video/?c5124900/donald-trump-disavows-project-2025

WHY didn't you include that in your post? Are you lying by omission?

 

[Politruk]

As I said, use of the National Guard has been done by EVERY President when faced with domestic unrest. This is NORMAL and ACCEPTED in extraordinary circumstances and is ALLOWED under the law.

Legal or not, the use of the NG was never justified to put down labor strikes in the 19th or 20th Centuries. Nor was it ever legitimate to use it against the Vietnam War protestors. Nor against the BLM demonstrations.

How is what Trump is talking about now, using it against "radical left lunatics," any different?

He's talking as if he would have turned out the NG to put down the 2017 Women's March, if only it had occurred to him at the time.

 

[LLCox]

Trump has disavowed Project 2025.

and you think that means something.

 

[adrina]

As I said, use of the National Guard has been done by EVERY President when faced with domestic unrest. This is NORMAL and ACCEPTED in extraordinary circumstances and is ALLOWED under the law.

YOU attempting to limit this to Trump, and making it seem as if he's doing something illegal, only shows your desperation as Kamala fades in the polling and is likely to lose this election cycle.

He never said or implied domestic unrest.

You're supplying a context which does not exist.

"Radical left lunatics like Adam Schiff."

That's what Trump said.

 

[icanhelp1]

The use of the NG was never justified to put down labor strikes in the 19th or 20th Centuries. Nor was it ever legitimate to use it against the Vietnam War protestors. Nor against the BLM demonstrations. How is what Trump is talking about any different?

The NG SHOULD have been used on 01/06/20 -- THAT was an actual INSURRECTION.

It was not an insurrection. As far as deploying the Guard on 1/6 blame Pelosi. The NG is a state militia under the command of the governors of their respective state. It's pretty rare that a president would federalize guard troops for civil disturbance, that usually falls under the authority of the governor.

 

[HisArpy]

He never said or implied domestic unrest.

You're supplying a context which does not exist.

"Radical left lunatics like Adam Schiff."

That's what Trump said.

He is REQUIRED to have a basis for the use of the National Guard and CANNOT under the Posse Comitatus Act (18 USC 1385) use the Military for civil arrest or enforcement of civilian law in lieu of state police.

Thus, what you're attempting to say is ILLEGAL unless Trump uses the National Guard to quell civil unrest after authorization by the State's governor. YOU know this, I know this, TRUMP knows this because he's been faced with this in the past.

So cut the lying bullshit.

Adam Schiff has proven himself to be a threat to National Security. If he were to attempt to do as he and other democrats have allegedly said they will, and refuse to certify the election results if Trump wins, then they can be arrested, by the military if necessary since DC is a MILITARY district, and not a State, under the Constitution, and charged with sedition and conspiracy to commit sedition.

So again, cut the lying bullshit.

 

[icanhelp1]

It says that if you can't afford bail, that groups exists that can assist you. Not all who were arrested committed crimes.,


She didn't promote rioting.


And then when they didn't, he waited three hours to tell them that he loved them.

Trump advised his military leadership 3 days prior to deploy NG troops, the pentagon and Pelosi refused.

 

[Bn2f]

It was not an insurrection. As far as deploying the Guard on 1/6 blame Pelosi. The NG is a state militia under the command of the governors of their respective state. It's pretty rare that a president would federalize guard troops for civil disturbance, that usually falls under the authority of the governor.

Don't know what crap you're talking about today and don't care.
Just needed to extend the necessary polite greeting of "Howdy-doo, traitor!" to you this afternoon.

 

[ll74]

Trump advised his military leadership 3 days prior to deploy NG troops, the pentagon and Pelosi refused.

Round and round we go. I'm not interested in your position on this.topic. I merely pointed out your lie about the three women. I truly don't give a shit if you think 45 was involved or not in January 6.

 

[SmokingFap]

What kind of a fucking message is sent to protestors when you promote a bail fund for criminals. Fuck off with your bullshit.

What kind of a message does it send when you promise to PARDON Jan. 6 domestic terrorists?

YOU fuck off.

 

[HisArpy]

and you think that means something.

I think it means that your post is disingenuous by omitting the FACT that he has done so.

That you personally believe otherwise, without proof of anything, is insufficient to override FACT.

 

[SmokingFap]

I think it means that your post is disingenuous by omitting the FACT that he has done so.

That you personally believe otherwise, without proof of anything, is insufficient to override FACT.

Trump is a proven pathological liar. I don't trust him any further than I could kick his fat ass.

 

[HisArpy]

Trump is a proven pathological liar. I don't trust him any further than I could kick his fat ass.

That you believe so, without proof of anything except use of your personal political animas and bias, is insufficient to override FACTS.

Trump has disavowed Project 2025. Period. Full stop.