What the American people need to know about the Democratic Party machine ‘destroy democracy to save it’

[Politruk]

Thus, what you're attempting to say is ILLEGAL unless Trump uses the National Guard to quell civil unrest after authorization by the State's governor. YOU know this, I know this, TRUMP knows this because he's been faced with this in the past.

That does not mean he knows it. Even before his senile dementia, there was never any reason to expect Trump would know any lesson he once had been taught.

 

[Politruk]

That you believe so, without proof of anything except use of your personal political animas and bias, is insufficient to override FACTS.

Trump has disavowed Project 2025. Period. Full stop.

Even you know Trump is a pathological liar.

 

[SmokingFap]

That you believe so, without proof of anything except use of your personal political animas and bias, is insufficient to override FACTS.

Trump has disavowed Project 2025. Period. Full stop.

I don't have enough time or patience to list every lie Trump has ever told. And I'm not giving him the benefit of the doubt about his non-support of Project 2025. His own minions wrote it and are fighting to implement it. He has stated his support for elements of the plan without mentioning the project. He will follow the project's manifesto like a user's guide if he gets into office. Period. Full stop. Fuck off.

 

[adrina]

He is REQUIRED to have a basis for the use of the National Guard and CANNOT under the Posse Comitatus Act (18 USC 1385) use the Military for civil arrest or enforcement of civilian law in lieu of state police.

Thus, what you're attempting to say is ILLEGAL unless Trump uses the National Guard to quell civil unrest after authorization by the State's governor. YOU know this, I know this, TRUMP knows this because he's been faced with this in the past.

So cut the lying bullshit.

Adam Schiff has proven himself to be a threat to National Security. If he were to attempt to do as he and other democrats have allegedly said they will, and refuse to certify the election results if Trump wins, then they can be arrested, by the military if necessary since DC is a MILITARY district, and not a State, under the Constitution, and charged with sedition and conspiracy to commit sedition.

So again, cut the lying bullshit.

He never said or implied what you are claiming.

Adam Schiff is not a national security risk. Knock it off with the crazy bullshit.

You are trying to invent a context to rationalize what he said.

You'd be going apoplectic if Harris said what he did about "radical right lunatics like Ted Cruz".

 

[HisArpy]

He never said or implied what you are claiming.

Adam Schiff is not a national security risk. Knock it off with the crazy bullshit.

You are trying to invent a context to rationalize what he said.

You'd be going apoplectic if Harris said what he did about "radical right lunatics like Ted Cruz".

Lol, I wonder if we're EVER going to see all that "evidence" Schiff says he's seen which proves Trump is guilty of treason.

And of course you know that Schiff voted in favor of impeachement. Twice. Based on that "evidence" we've not ever seen but which the committee looked for and couldn't find.

I'm not inventing any context. I'm just not playing your anti-Trump hyperventilation game. Trump has been faced with political enemies since 2016. He's no stranger to what he can and can't do, or use the military for.

Finally, apparently you're very vocal about your belief in politicians when they say things while trying to get elected. But only if they're "bad" and spoken by the opposing party. If they're said by your candidate of choice, then you remain silent.

Why is that?

 

[icanhelp1]

Round and round we go. I'm not interested in your position on this.topic. I merely pointed out your lie about the three women. I truly don't give a shit if you think 45 was involved or not in January 6.

During the 2020 riots comments were made by all 3 that were pro BLM protest. You could not differentiate between peaceful or violent protesters. By day most were peaceful and at night they turned ugly. Dems even called violent protest peaceful. I'm not going to dig up all the comments made by Waters, Pelosi and Harris. They didn't need to say go violently protest, but as violent protest were happening they fueled it by their supporting comments. I really don't give a fuck what you think. I've been in those situations and how words are used especially during peak agitation don't necessarily have to outright suggest violence or even break our laws but any positive reinforcement by a politician can be a dog whistle to approve the use violence. Promoting a bail fund for criminals is a form of approval to break our laws. Suggesting to be more confrontational is outright promoting violence.

 

[Rotadom]

As I said, use of the National Guard has been done by EVERY President when faced with domestic unrest. This is NORMAL and ACCEPTED in extraordinary circumstances and is ALLOWED under the law.

YOU attempting to limit this to Trump, and making it seem as if he's doing something illegal, only shows your desperation as Kamala fades in the polling and is likely to lose this election cycle.

THERE IS NO THREAT OF ANYTHING, YOU HISTRIONIC

 

[icanhelp1]

trump.

President Biden.

My apologies. You're a liar, traitor, and senile.

IDIOT!

 

[Rotadom]

During the 2020 riots

Why did trump allow that to happen?

 

[Rotadom]

IDIOT!

Self reflection and emotional inventory is a sign of growth. Good job!

Now, address the fact that your cognitive skills are on par with the guy who played music at his town hall.

 

[icanhelp1]

Why did trump allow that to happen?

Are you people that stupid. Trump urged governors to deploy their NG troops. Democrat governors refused. It's not up to Trump to federalize state guard for state disturbances.

 

[Politruk]

Promoting a bail fund for criminals is a form of approval to break our laws.

Not like promising to pardon them is.

 

[adrina]

Lol, I wonder if we're EVER going to see all that "evidence" Schiff says he's seen which proves Trump is guilty of treason.

And of course you know that Schiff voted in favor of impeachement. Twice. Based on that "evidence" we've not ever seen but which the committee looked for and couldn't find.

I'm not inventing any context. I'm just not playing your anti-Trump hyperventilation game. Trump has been faced with political enemies since 2016. He's no stranger to what he can and can't do, or use the military for.

Finally, apparently you're very vocal about your belief in politicians when they say things while trying to get elected. But only if they're "bad" and spoken by the opposing party. If they're said by your candidate of choice, then you remain silent.

Why is that?

Deflection.

The only reason you are rationalizing Trump is because of your propaganda based hate and fear of democrats and liberals.

In the meantime you'd be going apoplectic if it was a Democrat who said this. And despite you trying to push your hypocrisy on me, I would not be okay with a Democrat saying what Trump did.

Because I believe in our government, our Constitution and our ideals. Unlike you.

 

[icanhelp1]

Self reflection and emotional inventory is a sign of growth. Good job!

Now, address the fact that your cognitive skills are on par with the guy who played music at his town hall.

Why don't you spend more time trying to figure out what policies Harris stands for, that should keep you busy till Nov 5th. Hint! Ya can't use gibberish like opportunity economy.

 

[adrina]

Why don't you spend more time trying to figure out what policies Harris stands for, that should keep you busy till Nov 5th. Hint! Ya can't use gibberish like opportunity economy.

Again, what is the context from his words that makes it okay for the president of the United States to turn the US military on the US citizens?

 

[ll74]

During the 2020 riots comments were made by all 3 that were pro BLM protest.

There's a key word in there......

You could not differentiate between peaceful or violent protesters.

This is incorrect.

By day most were peaceful and at night they turned ugly.

I some places, there was violence. In others, full blown rioters. In most places, there was neither.

Dems even called violent protest peaceful. I'm not going to dig up all the comments made by Waters, Pelosi and Harris.

You said they promoted riots. This is a lie.

They didn't need to say go violently protest, but as violent protest were happening they fueled it by their supporting comments. I really don't give a fuck what you think.

Interesting how you don't apply the same logic to January 6.

I've been in those situations and how words are used especially during peak agitation don't necessarily have to outright suggest violence or even break our laws but any positive reinforcement by a politician can be a dog whistle to approve the use violence.

Interesting take there.

Promoting a bail fund for criminals is a form of approval to break our laws.

Bail funds are for people who can't afford bail.

Sorry you don't like them. As long as bail exists, they will exist. People are innocent until prove guilty, they should not also be subject to obscene monetary penalties.

Suggesting to be more confrontational is outright promoting violence.

I correct.

 

[Bn2f]

Trump is a proven pathological liar. I don't trust him any further than I could kick his fat ass.

I don't think you mean physically beating him in like a fight, right, but more like the enormous effort it would take you in raising your feet high enough off the ground to meet his fat ass? Or didya mean that his ass is so fat that you would tire yourself from attempting to kick that much ass? Just need some clarification here.

 

[Rotadom]

Why don't you spend more time trying to figure out what policies Harris stands for, that should keep you busy till Nov 5th. Hint! Ya can't use gibberish like opportunity economy.

Name one of trump's current economic policies. Or, even a concept of an economic policy.

Quit deflecting, traitor.

 

[Rotadom]

Are you people that stupid. Trump urged governors to deploy their NG troops. Democrat governors refused. It's not up to Trump to federalize state guard for state disturbances.

The President doesn't have the authority?

Lol, give it up, traitor.

 

[icanhelp1]

Name one of trump's current economic policies. Or, even a concept of an economic policy.

Quit deflecting, traitor.

Drill baby Drill!!!

 

[Politruk]

Why don't you spend more time trying to figure out what policies Harris stands for, that should keep you busy till Nov 5th. Hint! Ya can't use gibberish like opportunity economy.

See here.

 

[HisArpy]

Deflection.

The only reason you are rationalizing Trump is because of your propaganda based hate and fear of democrats and liberals.

In the meantime you'd be going apoplectic if it was a Democrat who said this. And despite you trying to push your hypocrisy on me, I would not be okay with a Democrat saying what Trump did.

Because I believe in our government, our Constitution and our ideals. Unlike you.

Newsflash; I don't care that you're insane and afraid of reality.

 

[Rotadom]

Drill baby Drill!!!

We're currently drilling more than we ever have, uninformed traitor.

BIDENOMICS, BABY!!!

Lol, give it up.

 

[LLCox]

I think it means that your post is disingenuous by omitting the FACT that he has done so.

That you personally believe otherwise, without proof of anything, is insufficient to override FACT.

My proof is that trump is a born liar... and you know it.

 

[Rotadom]

Newsflash; I don't care that you're insane and afraid of reality.

You and reality aren't even distant cousins.