LITEROTICA PODCAST
LIT CAMS (200 Free Tokens)ADULT TOYSVOD MOVIES

What the US 2024 “Election” Will Resolve:

Holy_Seduction said:
Politruk:

You did see the abbreviation for World War.

I’ll assume that you possess the native intelligence to work that out for yourself.

I’ll also leave it to you to work out where conflict currently unfolds, where it is expanding, and to extrapolate from that what happens as conflicts begin merging into an ever-greater conflagration.

Now if you don’t believe that, say do. Because if you really can’t do as I’ve suggested, I doubt I can much help you.
Click to expand...
Russia is weak. They’re reduced to using mercenaries from North Korea to continue their aggression in Ukraine.
 
Holy_Seduction said:
Politruk:

You did see the abbreviation for World War.

I’ll assume that you possess the native intelligence to work that out for yourself.

I’ll also leave it to you to work out where conflict currently unfolds, where it is expanding, and to extrapolate from that what happens as conflicts begin merging into an ever-greater conflagration.

Now if you don’t believe that, say do. Because if you really can’t do as I’ve suggested, I doubt I can much help you.
Click to expand...

No world war is going to break out over Ukraine.
 
Last edited:
BrightShinyGirl said:
Russia chose to attack Ukraine. Harris supporting Ukraine doesn’t lead to more war between the U.S. and Russia, it means Russia will be forced to back down and leave Ukraine alone.
Click to expand...
Dear BrightShinyGirl:

I’ve always taken you to be one of the brighter minds on these fora.

I may be wrong here … but I don’t believe so. And I think you have the native intelligence to put your premises to the test.

But at this point, I don’t want you not to ponder what you’ve written here. I want you to ponder something you’ve not written.

BrightShinyGirl, what do you think is the likelihood that events can be cut off from their remote causes and their intermediate causes, without doing violence to their interpretation, since things most often are as they appear to be, and their meaning is therefore readily apparent immediately?

Later!
 
Holy_Seduction said:
You can say ‘unpatriotic’ and I’ll not rebuke you. I don’t agree, but I won’t call you for saying it either.

You can say ‘a nobody,’ and I’ll let that pass also. In this great lordly kakistocracy [look it up], the ‘nobodies’ amount to 90% of the population.

You can also say ‘nothing of substance’ because … I don’t much interact with partisan talking points.

But ‘lazy’ crosses the line. But I warn you — it may upset you to read further. People tend not to like the loss of manipulative influence over others. Still reading?

The problem isn’t laziness.

There was a well framed if terse reply to a league of voters communique threatening to expose my proudly abysmal record to my neighbors. My reply, sent by registered mail, indicated my response to the “Campagne de diffamation.

I then distributed that reply, together with a copy of the leagues’ censorious screed to my neighbors in advance of the election!

Nor was I too lazy to go to the County Board of Elections and secure the removal of my name from the voters’ registry.

You see, Bn2f, the problem with me isn’t laziness. It is my activism. One last example.

The second Gulf War. The Foreign Minister [obviously another NATO country] whined that this time, countries just weren’t getting on the militarist bandwagon.

Shortly thereafter, that person received a registered letter containing a broadsheet of decidedly offsetting points on that conflict … together with a list of the foreign embassies to which my communication had gone — PLUS the explanation that this was done as partial retribution for a position taken by said Foreign Minister on a completely different matter.

You should probably be glad that I’m not much more active than I am. Believe me when I tell you — regime officials don’t like it when I launch one of my campaigns.
Click to expand...
Sir, wat is weak. Wat is a pussy. I forgot to add that as well. Stick around, whenever wat crawls out I’ll probably have more to say against him than his laziness. I applaud your activism but it doesn’t transfer to this member. Did you vote? Who are you voting for?
 
Holy_Seduction said:
Dear BrightShinyGirl:

I’ve always taken you to be one of the brighter minds on these fora.

I may be wrong here … but I don’t believe so. And I think you have the native intelligence to put your premises to the test.

But at this point, I don’t want you not to ponder what you’ve written here. I want you to ponder something you’ve not written.

BrightShinyGirl, what do you think is the likelihood that events can be cut off from their remote causes and their intermediate causes, without doing violence to their interpretation, since things most often are as they appear to be, and their meaning is therefore readily apparent immediately?

Later!
Click to expand...
Why do you think Russia attacked Ukraine?
 
BrightShinyGirl said:
Russia is weak. They’re reduced to using mercenaries from North Korea to continue their aggression in Ukraine.
Click to expand...
Comparatively (organizationally) weak.

They have resources and the great equalizer.

They are very powerful and can mobilize army after army as they grind Ukraine into dust and in our misguided foreign policy we are making sure Ukraine can never emerge whole. We should have let the chips fall and let the resistance bleed the red Russians white.

This is a win-won for both sides of that alliance; Kim needs CA$H and oil...

... and something for his young men to do away from home.
 
JoePepsiCo said:
Comparatively (organizationally) weak.

They have resources and the great equalizer.

They are very powerful and can mobilize army after army as they grind Ukraine into dust and in our misguided foreign policy we are making sure Ukraine can never emerge whole. We should have let the chips fall and let the resistance bleed the red Russians white.

This is a win-won for both sides of that alliance; Kim needs CA$H and oil...

... and something for his young men to do away from home.
Click to expand...

What’s your favorite pup on Paw Patrol?
 
Bn2f said:
Sir, wat is weak. Wat is a pussy. I forgot to add that as well. Stick around, whenever wat crawls out I’ll probably have more to say against him than his laziness. I applaud your activism but it doesn’t transfer to this member. Did you vote? Who are you voting for?
Click to expand...
One minor correction, if I may. That is an insult to pussies. Everywhere.
 
Who would have ever thunk,

"I'm from Washington and I'm here to help,"

was a traditional Chinese curse...
 
WDS is alive and well.


Listen to the cancer cells chowing down . . . .
 
Allah is merciful.


Allah also keeps an accurate set of books . . . .
 
Wat is weak. Wat is dickless. Anyone coming to LOLz with him is a political eunuch too.
 
Wat_Tyler said:
WDS is alive and well.


Listen to the cancer cells chowing down . . . .
Click to expand...
Yeah, no. Don’t wish death to any trumper. Hope you live to see, according to the OP, gay, colored, female, and all manner of mental gimps vote in Harris and have the likes of you complain when she brings inhome healthcare to seniors suffering from cancer and memes disease.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Rightguide
The Election Steal Is Already Underway
8 9 10
Replies
229
Views
3K
dmallord
dmallord
AndersonsBiographer
Trump’s conviction in New York and the 2024 crisis election
Replies
14
Views
347
Chernosoth
Chernosoth
AndersonsBiographer
The Tortured Poets Department and the Taylor Swift phenomenon
Replies
6
Views
432
schism666
schism666
DeluxAuto
The Swift Jobs Recovery Under Biden Will Have Long-Lasting Benefits for Workers
Replies
13
Views
395
dabamafan
D
P
Election expert says voter suppression isn't the biggest threat to democracy
Replies
10
Views
702
pecksniff
P
Back
Top