Why can't we have a Scat, Bestiality, and Pedophile forum?

Not that it matters, but just for the record I disagree with the views expressed by most on this thread.

In my view, power and pain are integral aspects of human sexuality - as are tenderness, humor, sensuality, and so on. The mix varies from person to person and context to context, of course. But in general, I don't see the world as divided between those who belong under some so-called "BDSM umbrella" and those who do not.
Of course your view matters.. :)
What i was saying was that although some people, and i'm pressuming a fair amout of us, count ourselves as being under this 'BDSM umbrella' in my oppinion i dislike how BDSM is all inclusive in a way. I don't believe that BDSM is all about fetishes - that's what fetish threads are for - of course it can include fetishes (from reading the threads on this forum people have bondage fetishes ect. which are included in BDSM) but not everyone does have a fetish.

I don't know, this is all completely off-topic now, i just think that there should be another forum for it, and people who want to be part of both can...
Any ideas where we can ask about that?
 
As to pedophilia, incest and (I am guessing) bestiality, I'm guessing it's tougher to find people who will admit to activities which are against the law.

What I am confused about is ... has there been a rash of threads about sex with kids, animals or involving shit?

I personally think WD is still recovering from the election. :cool:
 
I haven't seen any threads about it apart from this one....

Well there was the classy "Women smelling and tasting thier own ass"

I'm well past the election and looking to 2010. And hoping Obama can find enough honest taxpayers to fill his cabinet. :D
 
Totally, and then lets make a forum for subs who say stuff without a sir, and then anotherone for blacks, and wasps, and fat people, and so on.
 
It is funny all the talk of "what is" and "what in not"... I do agree with the kid thing. No way with fucking around with unwilling kids!! There are so many incest stories on lit..does nothing for me. Also beastiality...lotta women want to fuck a dog or jerk off a horse...does nothing for me. That is ok. People will stick an entire fist up an ass and make it gape open..and thats ok but scat is so far off in left field. I am not into scat but must confess that highly anal activities border pretty close to it. there is no anal forum that I have seen so I think the bsdm catches alot of the fringe stuff. just my too few sense.
 
I have to hand it to "Women smelling and tasting -"

There's rarely a thread that's as obvious about whether you want to read it or not.
 
I have to hand it to "Women smelling and tasting -"

There's rarely a thread that's as obvious about whether you want to read it or not.

I know. Just seeing the nic 'stinkyfingers' makes me want to retch. That's a whole world of weird that I want no part of.
 
I was thinking about it today, and i think thatif we don't want it or like then we just ignore it i suppose. I know that's really contradictory to what i've said before but maybe its best, we don't have to read every thread on here, just what we're interested in. Someones idea of BDSM is someone elses idea of 'this should be illegal' or whatever really....
 
I was thinking about it today, and i think thatif we don't want it or like then we just ignore it i suppose. I know that's really contradictory to what i've said before but maybe its best, we don't have to read every thread on here, just what we're interested in. Someones idea of BDSM is someone elses idea of 'this should be illegal' or whatever really....

Some titles of the threads are obvious, but some of them, you don't know until you read them that you didn't WANT to read them, LOL.
 
Some titles of the threads are obvious, but some of them, you don't know until you read them that you didn't WANT to read them, LOL.
I guess so lols, to be honest i was thinking aloud really, i should stop doing that on forums lol.
 
Short & Sweet

Almost every community, social group or even individual has, historically, needed a "lesser class" of practitioners to look down upon or condescend to for whatever reason. Religous, sociological, cultural, take your pick.
It's human nature.

Nature of the best.
 
I do not care what your fetish is, if playing with poo get you off so be it I have a yard you can clean up, if you think a dog or cow or what have ya needs your love have at it. But when you say kids that is the line, as a father if i ever found out some one even thought that of any of my kids I will hunt them down and if I was caught for killing them I own up to what I did and hope for mercy from the judge and jury. As a hunter I know way to make stuff disappear, I also train to kill animals and in my book a molester is an animal. So please do not think it would be funny to joke about threads about kids.
 
I'm relatively certain it wasn't meant to be a joke, or WD wouldn't have put it in Talk.

I think he has a point, in a way. Why does every fetish, every anti-social impulse, everything that's not missionary-on-Saturday-night-with-the-lights-out fall here?

Just wondering.
 
Probably because there are only two places dedicated to discussing sex on its own as opposed to sex in the context of a story or similar, and it fits better in the BDSM section than the GLBT section. As for the original topic, I was about to chime in with something like "hey got nothing against the first two but that third's a tad illegal". Theshop got there before me, even if he did go all internet tough guy on us with the last couple of lines.
 
I'm not quite sure how to solve this issue, though. It would be like having a seperate threesomes forum just because people post threads about threesomes constantly in How To.
 
Probably because there are only two places dedicated to discussing sex on its own as opposed to sex in the context of a story or similar, and it fits better in the BDSM section than the GLBT section.
This is a really good point.

A few notable exceptions aside, as far as I can tell the General Board exists primarily to serve those who truly, madly, deeply despise the President of the United States.
 
I'm relatively certain it wasn't meant to be a joke, or WD wouldn't have put it in Talk.

I think he has a point, in a way. Why does every fetish, every anti-social impulse, everything that's not missionary-on-Saturday-night-with-the-lights-out fall here?

Just wondering.

Does that not drive you insane? I hate when you are reading the message boards and someone puts "Oh, that belongs with all the weirdos in the BDSM forum"---Does anyone actually know that we are the normal ones? :rolleyes:

I thought all those questions belonged in the Darkroom Lounge.
 
Does that not drive you insane? I hate when you are reading the message boards and someone puts "Oh, that belongs with all the weirdos in the BDSM forum"---Does anyone actually know that we are the normal ones? :rolleyes:

I thought all those questions belonged in the Darkroom Lounge.

I like the Darkroom Lounge
 
Took me a little while to work out the first post and point of this thread.

It's a fair point. This is a BDSM forum but it seems to encompass a fair few aspects of general Fetish. I am guilty of this, I am not into BDSM (although I find some threads on here fascinating), but I am into some strong fetish stuff, so I am cluttering up the forum replying to threads about buttplugs and starting ones about watersports. It just seemed like a reasonably sensible forum to get some views on.

It's up to the site mods and I guess a vague consensus of users isn;t it?? One could keep the general fetish stuff on here, or alternatively have this as a pure BDSM forum (which it certainly seems strong and focused enough to be), AND have a Fetish forum covering, well, serious anal, watersports, scat, fisting, gaping, body mods, animals, and whatever else. I think that could be fine, as long as it's well used and well supported....
 
Define kids. Does pedophilia include peeps who like other peeps over 18 who pretend to be under 18 or just peeps who are into peeps who actually are under 18?

i never can understand what people mean when they say "no kids". If it only means into people who have literally only been on this earth less than 18 years does that seriously need to be stated or does "pedophile" now include men who are into... oh i don't know.... say... me?
 
Define kids. Does pedophilia include peeps who like other peeps over 18 who pretend to be under 18 or just peeps who are into peeps who actually are under 18?

i never can understand what people mean when they say "no kids". If it only means into people who have literally only been on this earth less than 18 years does that seriously need to be stated or does "pedophile" now include men who are into... oh i don't know.... say... me?

Nah, ageplay doesn't count. Every time I've heard heard anyone say "no kids," they meant no one under the biological age of 18.
 
Back
Top