Why We Have the Political Opinions We Have, by John Engelman

[Fuzzy1975]

Whatever makes you feel good about being a.piece of shit.

You may have hit the nail on the head. He does get validation here for being a Racist piece of shit!!

 

[ll74]

You may have hit the nail on the head. He does get validation here for being a Racist piece of shit!!

He says he doesn't care that people call him a racist, but when we do, he goes out of his way to make sure that he changes the definition.

 

[Fuzzy1975]

He says he doesn't care that people call him a racist, but when we do, he goes out of his way to make sure that he changes the definition.

He's as stiff as boiled spaghetti on that.

 

[JohnEngelman]

Whatever makes you feel good about being a.piece of shit.

 

[JohnEngelman]

Nothing you post above denies my assertion that you would have grovelled at Hitlers feet....NOTHING!

Fucking Racist piece of shit....BTW are you ever going to go back and post the WHOLE of Jessie Jackson speech to the PUSH organisation? Nah you're just gona pretend it never happened, that what Racists fuck like you do....if it doesn't support your fucked up views, then you ignore it!!!

FUCK OFF AND DIE *chuckles*

Arthur Jensen is Professor of Educational Psychology at the University of California, Berkeley. He is perhaps the world’s best-known scholar in the field of racial differences in intelligence. Ever since 1969, when his article, “How Much Can We Boost IQ and Scholastic Achievement?”, appeared in the Harvard Educational Review, he has been at the center of what is probably the most controversial of all academic fields. Prof. Jensen has been widely reviled, but his patient research and keen analysis have now won a position of near-unanimity for his views — at least among specialists...

Professor Arthur Jensen: But the black population in this country is in a sense burdened by the large number of persons who are at a level of g that is no longer very relevant to a highly industrialized, technological society. Once you get below IQs of 80 or 75, which is the cut-off for mental retardation in the California School System, children are put into special classes. These persons are not really educable up to a level for which there’s any economic demand. The question is, what do you do about them? They have higher birth-rates than the other end of the distribution.

People are shocked and disbelieving when you tell them that about one in four blacks in our population are in that category — below 75.

----------

After Professor Jensen's article appeared in the Harvard Educational Review his classes at Berkeley were interrupted by new left thugs, he received death threats, and sometimes required police protection.

In Professor Jensen's article he maintained that little could be done to improve academic ability and academic performance. The following chart substantiates his assertion:

 

[ll74]

A

Arthur Jensen is Professor of Educational Psychology at the University of California, Berkeley. He is perhaps the world’s best-known scholar in the field of racial differences in intelligence. Ever since 1969, when his article, “How Much Can We Boost IQ and Scholastic Achievement?”, appeared in the Harvard Educational Review, he has been at the center of what is probably the most controversial of all academic fields. Prof. Jensen has been widely reviled, but his patient research and keen analysis have now won a position of near-unanimity for his views — at least among specialists...

Professor Arthur Jensen: But the black population in this country is in a sense burdened by the large number of persons who are at a level of g that is no longer very relevant to a highly industrialized, technological society. Once you get below IQs of 80 or 75, which is the cut-off for mental retardation in the California School System, children are put into special classes. These persons are not really educable up to a level for which there’s any economic demand. The question is, what do you do about them? They have higher birth-rates than the other end of the distribution.

People are shocked and disbelieving when you tell them that about one in four blacks in our population are in that category — below 75.

----------

After Professor Jensen's article appeared in the Harvard Educational Review his classes at Berkeley were interrupted by new left thugs, he received death threats, and sometimes required police protection.

In Professor Jensen's article he maintained that little could be done to improve academic ability and academic performance. The following chart substantiates his assertion:

View attachment 2204934
From the following bell curve we can see that only a thin sliver of blacks have IQ's of 115 or above. One needs at least 115 to be adequate as a professional or a manager. Of course, more is better. Unfortunately, affirmative action programs advance blacks to positions where they lack the intelligence to perform adequately. This is why it is important for the Supreme Court to rule against affirmative action, not only in university admissions, but in hiring decisions.

View attachment 2204936

Arthur Jensen died over a decade ago.

Outdated.

 

[JohnEngelman]

A

Arthur Jensen died over a decade ago.

Outdated.

The truth is never outdated.

 

[ll74]

The truth is never outdated.

Lol...the data is the truth. And two decades without data is definitely outdated.

 

[Fuzzy1975]

Lol...the data is the truth. And two decades without data is definitely outdated.

Let us not fail to mention the IQ graph is about matching youths, for youth employment for ages 14-21 years old....JE is a fucking idot,as well as a Racist!

 

[JohnEngelman]

Lol...the data is the truth. And two decades without data is definitely outdated.

--

 

[Fuzzy1975]

Wh

There is no evidence anywhere that blacks have closed the race gap in objective measurements of intelligence. The reason for the paucity of evidence on the internet is that the truth is being suppressed. If blacks had closed the race gap, date proving that closure would be easy to find.

What does the title at the bottom of your IQ graph read?

 

[ll74]

There is no evidence anywhere that blacks have closed the race gap in objective measurements of intelligence. The reason for the paucity of evidence on the internet is that the truth is being suppressed. If blacks had closed the race gap, date proving that closure would be easy to find.

That has nothing to do with your outdated information. Nothing is being suppressed.

 

[JohnEngelman]

Let us not fail to mention the IQ graph is about matching youths, for youth employment for ages 14-21 years old....JE is a fucking idot,as well as a Racist!

 

[EmptyTank]

what is the definition od racist

it seems to vary by political persuasion

mostly it has morphed into playground taunt

neener neener neener your mother wears combat boots and you are a racist
now are you not ashamed that you dared say a thing like that
your red badge is now a yellow star
courage david
courage

 

[ll74]

what is the definition od racist

it seems to vary by political persuasion

mostly it has morphed into playground taunt

neener neener neener your mother wears combat boots and you are a racist
now are you not ashamed that you dared say a thing like that
your red badge is now a yellow star
courage david
courage

There are things called websites you can use, not to mention this definition has been provided multiple times on this forum.

https://www.oxfordlearnersdictionaries.com/us/definition/english/racist_1?q=Racist

having the belief that some races of people are better than others or having general beliefs about other people based only on their race; showing this through violent or unfair treatment of people of other races

(And JE fits the definition above...nothing political about it)

 

[JohnEngelman]

There are things called websites you can use, not to mention this definition has been provided multiple times on this forum.

https://www.oxfordlearnersdictionaries.com/us/definition/english/racist_1?q=Racist

having the belief that some races of people are better than others or having general beliefs about other people based only on their race; showing this through violent or unfair treatment of people of other races

(And JE fits the definition above...nothing political about it)

On many occasions I have pointed out that this is not my belief: I do not have "general beliefs about other people based only on their race.

I do evaluate people on the basis of characteristics that correlate with race. These are intelligence, obedience to the law, and monogamy. By missing that important distinction you commit the Straw Man Fallacy.

You cannot disprove the beliefs that I really do have, so you distort them.

 

[ll74]

having the belief that some races of people are better than others or having general beliefs about other people based only on their race; showing this through violent or unfair treatment of people of other races

On many occasions I have pointed out that this is not my belief: I do not have "general beliefs about other people based only on their race.

I do evaluate people on the basis of characteristics that correlate with race. These are intelligence, obedience to the law, and monogamy. By missing that important distinction you commit the Straw Man Fallacy.

You cannot disprove the beliefs that I really do have, so you distort them.

You can say it isn't your belief. Your posts disagree.

Why are you correlating race if it isn't your belief? Why are the qualities you discuss on this forum always based on race?

 

[JohnEngelman]

You can say it isn't your belief. Your posts disagree.

Why are you correlating race if it isn't your belief? Why are the qualities you discuss on this forum always based on race?

Quote me where I said that I have "general beliefs about other people based only on their race."

On many occasions I have pointed that the characteristics I appreciate in people are intelligence, obedience to the law, and monogamy. I have added that these characteristics are found in members in each of the races. Finally, I have demonstrated that they are more likely to be found in Orientals than in whites and Negroes, and more likely to be found in whites than in Negroes.

 

[ll74]

Quote me where I said that I have "general beliefs about other people based only on their race."

On many occasions I have pointed that the characteristics I appreciate in people are intelligence, obedience to the law, and monogamy. I have added that these characteristics are found in members in each of the races. Finally, I have demonstrated that they are more likely to be found in Orientals than in whites and Negroes, and more likely to be found in whites than in Negroes.

Lol....you use pedantics to explain your racism away.

I've never said you said the exact words, idiot.

Racism is not about words..it's not even about data or studies or even correlation of events...it's about beliefs.

 

[JohnEngelman]

Lol....you use pedantics to explain your racism away.

I've never said you said the exact words, idiot.

Racism is not about words..it's not even about data or studies or even correlation of events...it's about beliefs.

Definitions of words are conventions, not unchanging facts. The word "racist" has been used carelessly. It is not used to advance the dialogue on race President Clinton called for and which we need to have. It is used as a form of name calling to suppress the dialogue.

Those who dislike me because of my beliefs will always dislike me. I want them to have an accurate understanding of my beliefs.

I am a heriditarian. This means that I believe that gene alleles are quite a bit more important than other factors in determining ability levels and behavior.

I am a race realist. This means that I believe that the races differ significantly in characteristics important for the creation and maintenance of thriving societies and civilizations, and that these differences are largely determined genetically.

 

[ll74]

Definitions of words are conventions, not unchanging facts. The word "racist" has been used carelessly. It is not used to advance the dialogue on race President Clinton called for and which we need to have. It is used as a form of name calling to suppress the dialogue.

Those who dislike me because of my beliefs will always dislike me. I want them to have an accurate understanding of my beliefs.

I am a heriditarian. This means that I believe that gene alleles are quite a bit more important than other factors in determining ability levels and behavior.

I am a race realist. This means that I believe that the races differ significantly in characteristics important for the creation and maintenance of thriving societies and civilizations, and that these differences are largely determined genetically.

Lol....for someone who doesn't care about being a racist....you sure spend a lot of time trying to refute that you are one.

You can't even accept the succinct label.....you have to call it something else to feel better about your shitty beliefs.

 

[JohnEngelman]

I was a race realist before I knew the term existed. Professor J. Philippe Rushton's essay "Race, Evolution, and Behavior" is the most succinct explanation of race realism I have encountered.

http://www.harbornet.com/folks/theedrich/JP_Rushton/Race.htm

I disagree with Professor Rushton on two of his assertions. They do not affect the political implications of the rest of the essay.

First, Professor Rushton thinks the division between Negroes and everyone else happened about 100,000 years ago. DNA evidence indicates 50,000 to 60.000 years.

Second, Professor Rushton thinks the only factor that is responsible for differences in average ability and behavior from Negroes on one hand, and whites and Orientals on the other is evolving in cold climates.

I think civilization is also important. Cold climates select genetically for intelligence and monogamy. Civilizations select genetically for intelligence and obedience to the law.

 

[JohnEngelman]

Lol....for someone who doesn't care about being a racist....you sure spend a lot of time trying to refute that you are one.

You can't even accept the succinct label.....you have to call it something else to feel better about your shitty beliefs.

Your insults and obscene words reveal you character, and indicate bad things about your intellect and breeding. They do not intimidate me.

 

[ll74]

I was a race realist before I knew the term existed. Professor J. Philippe Rushton's essay "Race, Evolution, and Behavior" is the most succinct explanation of race realism I have encountered.

http://www.harbornet.com/folks/theedrich/JP_Rushton/Race.htm

I disagree with Professor Rushton on two of his assertions. They do not affect the political implications of the rest of the essay.

First, Professor Rushton thinks the division between Negroes and everyone else happened about 100,000 years ago. DNA evidence indicates 50,000 to 60.000 years.

Second, Professor Rushton thinks the only factor that is responsible for differences in average ability and behavior from Negroes on one hand, and whites and Orientals on the other is evolving in cold climates.

I think civilization is also important. Cold climates select genetically for intelligence and monogamy. Civilizations select genetically for intelligence and obedience to the law.

The term is not a real thing - it is literally bullshit created by racists who don't like being called racists.

 

[ll74]

Your insults and obscene words reveal you character, and indicate bad things about your intellect. They do not intimidate me.

And yet you spend a lot of time trying to respond to them.

I've never intended to intimidate you.