Republicans are quite simply un-American

[freakyguy41]

Also not saying anyone owes me anything but if Russia had such a huge influence then show me the ads which caused people to vote trump. If you can't find at least a hundred people it swayed it's no of consequence based on the election results.

You do realize that the U.S. intelligence community reported russia attacked at least 23 states election systems and that at least 8 of them were breached. They left it up to each state as to whether or not publicly disclose who they are and whether or not Russia changed votes... only TX went public and has publicly stated Russia changed votes... while they do not know the extent of voting changes, TX did admit that Cruz is likely Senator because of Russian changing of votes... otherwise Beto would be Senator.

 

[bhurry]

You do realize that the U.S. intelligence community reported russia attacked at least 23 states election systems and that at least 8 of them were breached. They left it up to each state as to whether or not publicly disclose who they are and whether or not Russia changed votes... only TX went public and has publicly stated Russia changed votes... while they do not know the extent of voting changes, TX did admit that Cruz is likely Senator because of Russian changing of votes... otherwise Beto would be Senator.

'


Good source for info

 

[freakyguy41]

The mistake you made was asking a Democrat Party member to backup his statements with proof.

That is ONLY allowed when it's a Democrat demanding citations from anyone other than a Democrat.

Rumor has it, Keith has an alt or two and supposedly some unsubstantiated claims himself. (second hand info - who really knows the truth?)

Proof... you mean like the Mueller report which clearly states there is insufficient evidence to charge conspiracy only because there was no formal agreement between trump and russia but there is ample evidence to charge and convict trump of obstruction of justice?
Proof... like 37 people going to federal prison for their complicity while la douche bag trump and talk radio have repeatedly lied about what took place? What was it in the beginning... the one and only meeting with Russia was about adoption of infants from an orphanage turned into over 120 regular communications?
Proof... like la douche bag trump claiming he was with holding funds from Ukraine, which was illegal from the onset, because of corruption but in his communications, the word corruption was rarely if ever used but the demand for an illegal investigation into the Bidens was often used?
Proof... like forcing people to defy lawful subpoenas to not testify and trump's with holding of evidence?

Of course, republicans will never ever demand truth and evidence when it comes to Hillary because if the trumpettes applied the same logic to hillary that they use to exonerate la douche bag trump, they'd have to admit that Hillary is completely innocent of all the smear accusations. Remember... trump made a campaign promise to prosecute Hillary... so where is the prosecution? It'll never happen because it would definitively prove republican lies and that trumpettes conduct themselves as brainless parrots.

 

[markspa901]

LOL... I used the same belligerent tactic whenever my mother told me I should eat all my vegetables because there are starving people in the world... "name two"

Lol name two starving people? One is you who doesn't eat vegetables.

And Russia spend like $4,600 bucks on ads. Where's the proof that influenced anyone, and where's the proof any votes were changed?

 

[gunthernehmen]

The Dutch bought Manhattan from the Delaware people.

Did you get history lessons from Sarah Palin?

No. I'm Dutch.

 

[gunthernehmen]

Unfortunately the people on the far right of the political spectrum don't use their brains... they simply parrot what is told to them, performing more like ventriloquist dummies. They don't require truthful disclosure... they don't require facts nor evidence... they simply believe what is told to them because they want to believe they're righteously superior when, in fact, nothing could be further from the truth.

I'm positive that is how you FEELZ. But as we discussed, that doesn't make it so.

 

[gunthernehmen]

Proof... TLDR

Classic wall of text doesn't make anything truer.

You mentioned some things that could best be described as evidence at most. You failed at providing any proof.

 

[KeithD]

Y

And the democrats are trying to Mao the U.S...

What a stupid comment. You are clueless on who Mao was and what he did, aren't you?

If anything, the Democrats are trying to Norwegian the United States. And Trump loves Norwegians (although he likes East European whores more).

 

[gunthernehmen]

What a stupid comment. You are clueless on who Mao was and what he did, aren't you?

If anything, the Democrats are trying to Norwegian the United States. And Trump loves Norwegians (although he likes East European whores more).

So the Democrat Party wants us to ramp up gun production???

 

[icanhelp1]

You do realize that the U.S. intelligence community reported russia attacked at least 23 states election systems and that at least 8 of them were breached. They left it up to each state as to whether or not publicly disclose who they are and whether or not Russia changed votes... only TX went public and has publicly stated Russia changed votes... while they do not know the extent of voting changes, TX did admit that Cruz is likely Senator because of Russian changing of votes... otherwise Beto would be Senator.

Where is this claim that the texas vote was hacked by Russians. TX admitted that Cruz should have lost? Cruz won by 2%... 2% is a lot of hacked votes, I can't find anything that supports what you're claiming?

 

[icanhelp1]

Proof... you mean like the Mueller report which clearly states there is insufficient evidence to charge conspiracy only because there was no formal agreement between trump and russia but there is ample evidence to charge and convict trump of obstruction of justice?
Proof... like 37 people going to federal prison for their complicity while la douche bag trump and talk radio have repeatedly lied about what took place? What was it in the beginning... the one and only meeting with Russia was about adoption of infants from an orphanage turned into over 120 regular communications?
Proof... like la douche bag trump claiming he was with holding funds from Ukraine, which was illegal from the onset, because of corruption but in his communications, the word corruption was rarely if ever used but the demand for an illegal investigation into the Bidens was often used?
Proof... like forcing people to defy lawful subpoenas to not testify and trump's with holding of evidence?

Of course, republicans will never ever demand truth and evidence when it comes to Hillary because if the trumpettes applied the same logic to hillary that they use to exonerate la douche bag trump, they'd have to admit that Hillary is completely innocent of all the smear accusations. Remember... trump made a campaign promise to prosecute Hillary... so where is the prosecution? It'll never happen because it would definitively prove republican lies and that trumpettes conduct themselves as brainless parrots.

What lawful subpoenas? Hillary wasn't prosecuted because Comey took one for the team. Obama's DOJ and FBI WERE CORRUPT. Illegal FISA warrants, more to come.

 

[Ziggins]

Remember... trump made a campaign promise to prosecute Hillary... so where is the prosecution?

Would you prefer an Obama trial? Those are probably the two biggest fish in the coup attempt. Trump needs a bigger win in the reelection to gain some political capital. But Trump being Trump, maybe he'll blow it on infrastructure and disaster response.

 

[gunthernehmen]

Would you prefer an Obama trial? Those are probably the two biggest fish in the coup attempt. Trump needs a bigger win in the reelection to gain some political capital. But Trump being Trump, maybe he'll blow it on infrastructure and disaster response.

Although Obama did more to destroy the country than possibly any president in history, I think he did it though stupidity and naivete, not malice.

Hillary is driven by greed, hunger for power and by hatred, likely thanks to her mental illness.

Her crimes (which were actually proven, unlike the allegations Pelosi leveraged into an Impeachment) would have been prosecuted, convicted and rewarded with a prison sentence if it were almost anyone else. Had her crimes been committed by a Republican, they'd have probably found a way to impose the death penalty LOL

 

[BotanyBoy]

MANRA: Make America Non-Russian Again

Says the guy who hacks for the party that wants to turn the USA into the Soviet Socialist States of America.

 

[markspa901]

What a stupid comment. You are clueless on who Mao was and what he did, aren't you?

If anything, the Democrats are trying to Norwegian the United States. And Trump loves Norwegians (although he likes East European whores more).

You're right - Mao was great.

 

[YDB95]

You like to spout off! Cite for us all any proof that republicans support Neo-Naziz or White Supremacist. Show us any form of voter suppression, where does that exist, unless you consider having proof of citizenship ( ID ) voter suppression?

It is if it's aimed squarely (and "with almost surgical precision", as one court said about a North Carolina law) at disenfranchising groups that vote Democratic: https://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo...can-bid-to-revive-north-carolina-voter-id-law

Your brain dead.

Our brain dead what? Our brain dead opponents? Our brain dead president? Our brain dead mainstream media? Agreed on all accounts, but what about them?

 

[KeithD]

Precious. ICan't talks about "Your brain dead" and within those three words misuses "your." Wonderful example of ICan't being what he accuses others of being.

 

[gunthernehmen]

It is if it's aimed squarely at disenfranchising groups that vote Democratic

If these "groups" are US citizens and are registered voters, nobody (except the Black Panthers in 2008) is trying to disenfranchise them.

Most countries require identification at the polls. No reason the US should be any different in that regard.

 

[BotanyBoy]

What a stupid comment. You are clueless on who Mao was and what he did, aren't you?

He promoted progress, just like you KeithD....that's what his "Great leap forward" was about.

Getting rid of old ideas, customs, culture, habits and replacing them with collectivism and authoritarianism. Just like you want.

If anything, the Democrats are trying to Norwegian the United States. And Trump loves Norwegians (although he likes East European whores more).

LOL....no...Norwegians are very capitalistic and highly liberal.

They believe in things like private property.

Alt-reich by "progressive" standards.

When (D)'s like nearly every one running for the WH talks about nationalizing entire segments of the economy....eliminating private HC....taking over agriculture and energy. No private exchange of goods and services. That's straight up Marxist/Leninist socialism, the social/cultural side is where all the Maoism is at.

 

[gunthernehmen]

He promoted progress, just like you KeithD....that's what his "Great leap forward" was about.

Getting rid of old ideas, customs, culture, habits and replacing them with collectivism and authoritarianism. Just like you want.



LOL....no...Norwegians are very capitalistic and highly liberal.

They believe in things like private property.

Alt-reich by "progressive" standards.

When (D)'s like nearly every one running for the WH talks about nationalizing entire segments of the economy....eliminating private HC....taking over agriculture and energy. No private exchange of goods and services. That's straight up Marxist/Leninist socialism, the social/cultural side is where all the Maoism is at.

Just by the way, Norway is in the majority of countries that require photo id in order to vote.

 

[YDB95]

If these "groups" are US citizens and are registered voters, nobody (except the Black Panthers in 2008) is trying to disenfranchise them.

You can repeat that all you want, but it simply isn't true. Elderly African-Americans are substantially less likely to have a photo ID or to be able to get one (how good do you think record keeping was in the rural South 70 or 80 years ago?). If you clicked on my link in my last post (and I'm nearly certain you didn't), you know the NC law - just for ONE example - was aimed squarely at them. Native Americans living on reservations often don't have street addresses to put on their IDs, and North Dakota passed a law two years ago stipulating that a street address was necessary for voting. I could go on, but you either get the point by now or you're going to continue refusing to.

Most countries require identification at the polls. No reason the US should be any different in that regard.

I notice you say "identification", so already it's an apples-to-oranges comparison. Some US states accept non-photo ID such as a utility bill, for example. But more to the point, "most countries" (or at least the ones you're most likely referring to) do not have a history of systemic oppression within living memory of many of their citizens to the degree we do. The only one I can think of that does is South Africa. To pretend we didn't only just do away with poll taxes, literacy tests, etc. one generation ago is...well, it's immensely beneficial to the Republicans, for one thing!

 

[phrodeau]

If these "groups" are US citizens and are registered voters, nobody (except the Black Panthers in 2008) is trying to disenfranchise them.

Most countries require identification at the polls. No reason the US should be any different in that regard.

Black Panthers? No crime, no conviction, totally exonerated.

Why mention them, unless you’re a racist?

 

[gunthernehmen]

Trump? No crime, no conviction, totally exonerated**

Why mention him, unless you’re a frothing at the mouth Democrat?

Exactly.

Oh, the Black Panther thing, I get it. Everybody you don't agree with is racist. The topic was instances of voter disenfranchisement. That was one. They committed a crime, were prosecuted for it and ultimately found not guilty. Sounds familiar somehow, but I can't seem to remember where I've heard that, lately.

 

[gunthernehmen]

You can repeat that all you want, but it simply isn't true. Elderly African-Americans are substantially less likely to have a photo ID or to be able to get one (how good do you think record keeping was in the rural South 70 or 80 years ago?).

Most other countries REQUIRE an ID. There is no reason we should not as will.

Prove citizenship, then vote.

The rest of your nonsense is just that. Nonsense, intended to distract from the point. That someone not a citizen and qualified to vote, should not vote.

 

[allison22]

When Trump learned of a classified briefing to the House Intelligence Committee, he was furious — not over the threat of foreign meddling in the 2020 elections, but that Congress had been told about it.