Rightguide
Prof Triggernometry
- Joined
- Feb 7, 2017
- Posts
- 65,412
As Usual you brought up a non sequitur.As I said..... Yours is the non sequitur bullshit. Mine is based on objective fact
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
As Usual you brought up a non sequitur.As I said..... Yours is the non sequitur bullshit. Mine is based on objective fact
Nope.As Usual you brought up a non sequitur.
Just my opinion, but I believe Lockheed would handle it better. However, due to the involvement of DARPA technology, heightened national security considerations, and the intricate production process from design and simulation to final tooling and assembly, this aircraft will undergo far greater scrutiny than anything that came before it.Pshaw....Boeing stands to make a pretty good profit now that they're able to self-certify airworthiness.
Remember the 737MAX?
Heck they can probably use the basic 737MAX airframe, slap some delta wings on it, mount a rocket pod underneath and voilà (or 'wall uh' in Ishmael speak) it's done!
Aircraft safety is a luxury we can no longer afford or expect in the Golden Age of White America.
To be fair those programs that are over budget and rife with problems are confined within their contracts. This will be a new project from the ground up. While past performance matters, it’s only one of many factors influencing defense contracts. If a company can demonstrate improvements and unique capabilities, a previous overbudget program wouldn't automatically disqualify them from winning new contracts. All of these companies have suffered cost overruns, many caused by factors not totally under their control such as late-term engineering changes regarding added capabilities or cutbacks in design features not contemplated by either party in the initial design.Boeing is so far behind and overbudget on “trump’s” AF1 I’m surprised they got the f47
Bribes?
Historically, Boeing has had issues with being on time and on budget.To be fair those programs that are over budget and rife with problems are confined within their contracts. This will be a new project from the ground up. While past performance matters, it’s only one of many factors influencing defense contracts. If a company can demonstrate improvements and unique capabilities, a previous overbudget program wouldn't automatically disqualify them from winning new contracts. All of these companies have suffered cost overruns, many caused by factors not totally under their control such as late-term engineering changes regarding added capabilities or cutbacks in design features not contemplated by either party in the initial design.
I'm not ignoring it at all. I have issues with Boeing as I have alluded to but the decision has been made and it is what it is. My only hope is that something has changed in the way Boeing does business and the assurances they might have given to the government regarding their very public failures in the recent past.Historically, Boeing has had issues with being on time and on budget.
Ignoring that because your guy is in office is your own issue
Yes you areI'm not ignoring it at all
You think that somehow yourI have issues with Boeing as I have alluded to but the decision has been made and it is what it is. My only hope is that something has changed in the way Boeing does business and the assurances they might have given to the government regarding their very public failures in the recent past.
Trump has nothing to do with the success or failure of this program. It will fail or succeed in its quality assurance programs. The engineering is already there. They've been flying this craft for five years now.Yes you are
You think that somehow yourgodguy will make magical things happen because you're delusional.
The risk is high that they will continue to do the same things they've done , time and time again.
Of courseTrump has nothing to do with the success or failure of this program.
Of courseIt will fail or succeed in its quality assurance programs. The engineering is already there. They've been flying this craft for five years now.
LOL an article by a sports writer....too fucking funnyBoeing F-47 NGAD Stealth Fighter ‘Has Been Flying for 5 Years’
![]()
By
Steve Balestrieri
Published
2 days ago
That's another Boeing failure.
Just marking this for posterity. No other comments. Carry on...Trump has nothing to do with the success or failure of this program. It will fail or succeed in its quality assurance programs. The engineering is already there. They've been flying this craft for five years now.
The name will be changed once Trump is out of power.Of course
Which is why it's the F47
Of course
Whatever floats your boat.Just marking this for posterity. No other comments. Carry on...![]()
The designation F-47 for Boeing's upcoming sixth-generation fighter jet was chosen to honor the legacy of the P-47 Thunderbolt, a renowned World War II aircraft, and to commemorate the founding year of the U.S. Air Force in 1947. Additionally, it acknowledges the support of the 47th President of the United States, Donald Trump, who played a pivotal role in advancing the Next Generation Air Dominance (NGAD) program. Axios+4Wikipedia+4Business Insider+4The name will be changed once Trump is out of power.
Retcon.The designation F-47 for Boeing's upcoming sixth-generation fighter jet was chosen to honor the legacy of the P-47 Thunderbolt, a renowned World War II aircraft, and to commemorate the founding year of the U.S. Air Force in 1947. Additionally, it acknowledges the support of the 47th President of the United States, Donald Trump, who played a pivotal role in advancing the Next Generation Air Dominance (NGAD) program. Axios+4Wikipedia+4Business Insider+4
Tell wiki and sources.Retcon.
*nods*
Even the Houthies have radar, but hey, Stealth is all about deterrence.Will the U.S. ever again fight a First World enemy that has a radar system?
That's the only reason we'd need a "stealth" plane, isn't it?
Two important points:
- American News
- Mar 21, 2025
BREAKING: Trump, Hegseth announce next generation F-47 fighter jets
"Nothing in the world comes even close it, and it’ll be known as F-47."
On Friday, President Donald Trump, alongside Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth, announced the next generation of fighter jets for the United States Air Force, designated as F-47.
"I’m thrilled to announce that, at my direction, the United States Air Force is moving forward with the world’s first sixth-generation fighter jet," Trump said, adding that "nothing in the world comes even close it, and it’ll be known as F-47."
"The generals picked the title and it’s a beautiful number, F-47, it’s something the likes of which nobody has seen before. In terms of all of the attributes of a fighter jet, there’s never been anything even close to it, from speed to maneuverability to what it can have to payload."
He said that this has been in the works "for a long period of time," and the Air Force, after "rigorous and thorough competition" between top American aerospace companies, will be awarding the contract to Boeing. Senator Eric Schmitt said that the new jets would be produced in the state of Illinois.
https://thepostmillennial.com/breaking-trump-hegseth-announce-next-generation-f-47-fighter-jets
It's been a long time coming.