2024 Democratic National Convention Thread

:ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO: you get the idea LOL

Joe Biden went out the way he's been throughout his entire "career" as a taxpayer funded parasite. "Poorly Informed, Vindictive, and Dishonest...," forced out in an internal Party coup and with his "swan song" speech relegated humiliatingly to midnight when nobody except the Party Faithful would be awake and listening. Reminiscent of the best in Stalinist show trials.

Biden has always been consistent. Consistently wrong, consistently poorly informed, consistently and deliberately dishonest, consistently nasty, and consistently vindictive. Obama told us that we should never underestimate Joe Biden's ability to fuck things up and as former Defense Secretary Robert Gates said of him, "I think he has been wrong on nearly every major foreign policy and national security issue over the past four decades.” Something he proved all to capably during his so-called "Presidency". Last night, at the DNC, we saw Biden give the speech that will be seen as his swan song, and he was 100% consistent with his record: Dishonest, vindictive, nasty, and wrong. No surprises there, and there's no point in going into the details. The Demonrat sycophants' will deny, and those of us who are based in reality will agree.

The one good thing is that we can now bid farewell to one of the most dishonest, feckless, and incompetent (and let's make no bones about it, corrupt) politicians in the history of the USA. While technically he remains the President and still has a few months left in office, we all know he's not the one in charge, but at least he's finally out of the picture and good riddance, although we all know the only reason he's not the candidate is that Pelosi, Obama and Clinton stabbed in the back the candidate the Democratic Party members had voted for, despite knowing that he was a senile old fool with dementia.
I take it you are okay with Harris since you didn't mention her. So she has your vote? She has mine as well.
 
We've beaten that issue to death, read up on *stare decisis* and it's relationship to precedent and bad law.

SCOTUS will not allow Trump to sign any such ban, more assumptions based on misinformation.

Tell us you don't understand law or government without telling us you don't understand law or government.

I don't have the patience or inclination to pull your post apart and tell you everything wrong with it. But JFC you're an absolute moron.
 
It helps to remember the other thing he always says about abortion: that overturning Roe was what everyone wanted, left and right alike. You know as well as I that's horseshit - regardless of your own opinions on Roe - and it more than impugns his veracity on anything he says about abortion. Besides, it just isn't plausible to say the guy who nominated three of the Coathanger Five "does not support making abortion illegal".



True but irrelevant.
You give too much power to the office of the presidency.
 
The pop-up care aligns with Vice President Kamala Harris‘ adamant abortion platform. The Democratic nominee is in favor of legalizing abortion nationwide, previously calling it a “fundamental freedom” in an MSNBC interview.

Appears to me that the pop up care is closely aligned to the DNC.
To say that Harris, Biden, and almost every other democrat who is not a blue dog is in support of abortion rights is not a surprise. This still is not sponsored by the DNC.
 
Tell us you don't understand law or government without telling us you don't understand law or government.

I don't have the patience or inclination to pull your post apart and tell you everything wrong with it. But JFC you're an absolute moron.
Be my guest!!! I have a pretty comprehensive understanding of our constitution. I've been conversing with you and never once used ad-hom towards you to support my argument.
 
Be my guest!!! I have a pretty comprehensive understanding of our constitution. I've been conversing with you and never once used ad-hom towards you to support my argument.

Again, no inclination and if you honestly believe that SCOTUS would not allow the president to sign a law banning abortion at a federal level then you wouldn't understand anything I would try to communicate anyway.

I mean that is literally dumber than a fucking box of rocks to think that. I just can't even.
 
To say that Harris, Biden, and almost every other democrat who is not a blue dog is in support of abortion rights is not a surprise. This still is not sponsored by the DNC.
Point out where I said it was sponsored by the DNC?

What I wrote:

Providing abortion on demand at the Democrat National Convention is over the top. Shameful!
 
You give too much power to the office of the presidency.
If your point is that Trump couldn't unilaterally ban abortion, that's true. But if a ban got through Congress, I have no doubt at all he would sign it, because he knows it's what his base wants.
 
So his age is not a factor now that old man Biden got couped. :)
You might want to avoid using the word "coup" as long as you support the party that gave us January 6.

But let me guess, you're not a Republican.
 
Again, no inclination and if you honestly believe that SCOTUS would not allow the president to sign a law banning abortion at a federal level then you wouldn't understand anything I would try to communicate anyway.

I mean that is literally dumber than a fucking box of rocks to think that. I just can't even.
You don't have anything.
 
If your point is that Trump couldn't unilaterally ban abortion, that's true. But if a ban got through Congress, I have no doubt at all he would sign it, because he knows it's what his base wants.
You love hypotheticals!! If a ban made it through congress then that's the will of the people! I think he would sign it because of that.
 
She does have the knowledge that SCOTUS can't stop the president from signing a bill. They could declare the law unconstitutional after the fact, but if you believe the Coathanger Five would do that with an abortion ban...yeah, you don't believe that. You can't be that stupid.

Yes he is that stupid.

He's a trumper.
 
She does have the knowledge that SCOTUS can't stop the president from signing a bill. They could declare the law unconstitutional after the fact, but if you believe the Coathanger Five would do that with an abortion ban...yeah, you don't believe that. You can't be that stupid.
More name calling.
 
You love hypotheticals!! If a ban made it through congress then that's the will of the people! I think he would sign it because of that.

So then you admit Trump lied. That he would ban abortion on a federal level.

Are you drunk or just trying to hijack the DNC thread.
 
Another republican standing up and endorsing Harris. That's what, three or four now. With more coming from what I understand.
 
You love hypotheticals!!
You're the one stating with remarkable confidence that he would not do something his track record clearly indicates he would do.
If a ban made it through congress then that's the will of the people! I think he would sign it because of that.
He would probably say a thing like that, yes. But would it really be "the will of the people" if such a bill got through a gerrymandered House and a Senate whose majority typically represents tens of millions fewer people than the minority because Wyoming gets the same number of senators as California? No, no it would not.
 
Back
Top