A Real Woman Speaks

Fascinating.
Though "the concept of Marxism/socialism" is actually of your own making.
They are, in the real world, two separate and quite distinct ideologies. So you are going to have to google and cut and paste another 'explanation'.


Would you like me to correct your grammar?
Your reading for comprehension requires a little fine tuning. I never posted that Marxism is the same as socialism. What I implied was that "BOTH" concepts are expanding in the US at an alarming rate. Sanders with communism and Mamdani and AOC as democrat socialist. Both are antithetical to our original form of capitalism.
 
Your reading for comprehension requires a little fine tuning. I never posted that Marxism is the same as socialism. What I implied was that "BOTH" concepts are expanding in the US at an alarming rate. Sanders with communism and Mamdani and AOC as democrat socialist. Both are antithetical to our original form of capitalism.
Sanders is no more a Communist than you are, and Mamdani and AOC are not democratic socialists even if they claim the name. All three are social democrats. The most they really demand is 1) a vigorous welfare state, 2) a redistributive tax system, 3) pro-worker labor policies -- all within capitalism and in no way antithetical do it. The actually existing social democracies have capitalist economies.
 
So not being a Karen for Communism makes me dumb as fuck??? LOL Ok. :D (y)

I love how the people always calling me dumb and broke are also the ones who think they are entitled to my labor/property to pay for their "education" and basic needs.



LOL....which values do you think I have that are not?? Is it my lack of gay furry pride, feminism and commnism that you find so un-Christian??? Or do you find my lack of jihadi support/ass kissing that you find so un-Christian??

Also, what denomination of heretic are you?
Be sure to enjoy eternity in hell with the golden bozo and the rest of the maggots
 
Sanders is no more a Communist than you are, and Mamdani and AOC are not democratic socialists even if they claim the name. All three are social democrats. The most they really demand is 1) a vigorous welfare state, 2) a redistributive tax system, 3) pro-worker labor policies -- all within capitalism and in no way antithetical do it. The actually existing social democracies have capitalist economies.
My time today is short, so I won't be disassembling like a clock, but I'll start with the following:

First, the claim that Sanders, AOC, and Mamdani are merely “social democrats” ignores a basic distinction: social democracy is a capitalist system with a safety net, while democratic socialism explicitly treats capitalism as something to be transcended. Sanders himself has repeatedly said he wants to move the U.S. beyond capitalism, has praised elements of socialist regimes, and built his career inside organizations explicitly hostile to private ownership of major industries. That’s not Scandinavian pragmatism; that’s ideological hostility with better branding.
 
My time today is short, so I won't be disassembling like a clock, but I'll start with the following:

First, the claim that Sanders, AOC, and Mamdani are merely “social democrats” ignores a basic distinction: social democracy is a capitalist system with a safety net, while democratic socialism explicitly treats capitalism as something to be transcended. Sanders himself has repeatedly said he wants to move the U.S. beyond capitalism, has praised elements of socialist regimes, and built his career inside organizations explicitly hostile to private ownership of major industries. That’s not Scandinavian pragmatism; that’s ideological hostility with better branding.
You sound pretty silly to me, discoursing on the difference between "social democrat" and "democratic socialism" like a mediaeval scholastic!

If you like capitalism so much, then fix it. That's what Franklin Roosevelt did, and they called him "socialist" and "communist" for his troubles!
 
Fascinating.
Though "the concept of Marxism/socialism" is actually of your own making.
They are, in the real world, two separate and quite distinct ideologies.

Distinct, but not separate. They are deeply intertwined.

Not all socialist are Marxist, but all Marxist are socialist.
 
3Blessed are the poor in spirit,
for theirs is the Kingdom of Heaven.
4Blessed are those who mourn,
for they will be comforted.
5Blessed are the meek,
for they will inherit the Earth.
6Blessed are those who hunger and thirst for righteousness,
for they will be satisfied.
7Blessed are the merciful,
for they will be shown mercy.
8Blessed are the pure in heart,
for they will see God.
9Blessed are the peacemakers,
for they will be called the Sons of God.
10Blessed are those who are persecuted because of righteousness,
for theirs is the Kingdom of Heaven.
11Blessed are you when people insult you, persecute you and falsely say all kinds of evil against you because of Me.
12Rejoice and be glad, because great is your reward in heaven, for in the same way they persecuted the prophets who were before you...
 
3Blessed are the poor in spirit,
for theirs is the Kingdom of Heaven.
4Blessed are those who mourn,
for they will be comforted.
5Blessed are the meek,
for they will inherit the Earth.
6Blessed are those who hunger and thirst for righteousness,
for they will be satisfied.
7Blessed are the merciful,
for they will be shown mercy.
8Blessed are the pure in heart,
for they will see God.
9Blessed are the peacemakers,
for they will be called the Sons of God.
10Blessed are those who are persecuted because of righteousness,
for theirs is the Kingdom of Heaven.
11Blessed are you when people insult you, persecute you and falsely say all kinds of evil against you because of Me.
12Rejoice and be glad, because great is your reward in heaven, for in the same way they persecuted the prophets who were before you...


A heretic communist quoting scripture....... fascinating.
 
Not all science is equal or as pure as you seem to think it is.
Oh, I know research quite well having done some myself. And I’m well aware get corrupted by their precious hypothesis or get funded by companies whose products they’re researching.

When "science" is totally irrational and or suddenly starts making wild claims that line up far more with political and or economic interest than observable reality??? I absolutely question that. The more corporate interest and packs of politicians I see celebrating "science" and pimping it for their own self interest? The more skeptical I get about the validity of that "science".
Fair to be skeptical. But what if epigenetics research, which is what I’ve been referencing, is not political. What if it’s an honest inquiry into things that are happening in our society today. As for celebrating and pimping things out I’ve heard exactly one radio segment on epigenetics and had to google for a bit more info-this research isn’t being trotted out in media to make political points. And it’s not making wild claims nor is it irrational.

What epigenetics research is doing is trying to understand what happens that some people are gay, bi or transgender, or combination thereof.

They’re not there yet but the analogy is genitalia is formed in the first trimester of pregnancy, sexual identity in the second, and sexual orientation in the third. Mostly things go cis, but every now and then a switch gets thrown in different directions resulting in gay, bi, transgender in whatever combination. And that’s when you get a biological male (genitalia) whose true gender identity is female. Or in Lit parlance, truly a chick with a dick.

I encourage other independent thinking individuals to also treat "science" that's trying to "science" you for a vote or money to take a damn good look at that "science" and really ask themselves if the political and or corporate interest behind it would ever lie to you?? ;) Big Tobacco, oil, pharma....they've NEVER used "science" to benefit themselves right??? Politicians either...they'd NEVER lie. :ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO:
I agree

Travel safe.
Thanks.
 
My time today is short, so I won't be disassembling like a clock, but I'll start with the following:

First, the claim that Sanders, AOC, and Mamdani are merely “social democrats” ignores a basic distinction: social democracy is a capitalist system with a safety net, while democratic socialism explicitly treats capitalism as something to be transcended. Sanders himself has repeatedly said he wants to move the U.S. beyond capitalism, has praised elements of socialist regimes, and built his career inside organizations explicitly hostile to private ownership of major industries. That’s not Scandinavian pragmatism; that’s ideological hostility with better branding.
He might say that, but Sanders never proposes any bills that would do that, or move us in that direction -- nor would he as president.
 
When "science" is totally irrational and or suddenly starts making wild claims that line up far more with political and or economic interest than observable reality??? I absolutely question that.
It is not in any psychologist's political or economic interest to recognize the reality of transgenderism.
 
That is a big problem. Using house democrats as an example ( socialist democrats / Marxist ) never. Just give away the store. The wealth redistribution in our country is off the charts. 38 trillion in debt is quite telling.
Oh, fuck off, traitor. We're still suffering from trickle down, ya dumb bitch
 
He might say that, but never proposes any bills that would do that, or move us in that direction -- nor would he as president.
In his heart, Bernie is a Communist. That’s been obvious ever since his ideological honeymoon in Moscow, the only newlywed who came back with souvenirs, nostalgia, and a lifelong crush on central planning. Every policy he proposes is Marx in orthopedic shoes: same dogma, slower gait, louder complaints. He can rebrand it as “democratic,” “Nordic,” or “fairness with sprinkles,” but underneath that shaggy white hair and perpetual scolding is the same old fantasy, someone else pays, the state controls, and Bernie gets to wag his finger forever.
 
In his heart, Bernie is a Communist.
That is a better thing to be in one's heart than anything else. It would be the best kind of human society, if only it could be made to work. Every good Christian is a Communist in his heart, and every good Buddhist, too.
 
That is a better thing to be in one's heart than anything else. It would be the best kind of human society, if only it could be made to work. Every good Christian is a Communist in his heart, and every good Buddhist, too.
Total horse crap. Communism isn’t “being kind in your heart”; it’s concentrating authority in the hands of people who assure you they’re virtuous while building prisons for those who disagree. Charity is voluntary. Compassion is personal. Communism replaces both with coercion and then calls it morality. As for Christianity and Buddhism, both teach humility, restraint, and moral self-discipline. Communism teaches entitlement, envy, and the holiness of other people’s labor. If every good Christian were a Communist, the commandment would read “Thou shalt outsource thy conscience to the state.”

Yours is a strange defense for an idea that has failed everywhere it’s been tried, at enormous human cost.
 
Back
Top