Rightguide
Prof Triggernometry
- Joined
- Feb 7, 2017
- Posts
- 70,733
The US does not represent the whole of the available female population in the World.Then they would have no influence.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The US does not represent the whole of the available female population in the World.Then they would have no influence.
Your reading for comprehension requires a little fine tuning. I never posted that Marxism is the same as socialism. What I implied was that "BOTH" concepts are expanding in the US at an alarming rate. Sanders with communism and Mamdani and AOC as democrat socialist. Both are antithetical to our original form of capitalism.Fascinating.
Though "the concept of Marxism/socialism" is actually of your own making.
They are, in the real world, two separate and quite distinct ideologies. So you are going to have to google and cut and paste another 'explanation'.
Would you like me to correct your grammar?
What, there are more "woke fanatical female Fascists" in other countries?!The US does not represent the whole of the available female population in the World.
Sanders is no more a Communist than you are, and Mamdani and AOC are not democratic socialists even if they claim the name. All three are social democrats. The most they really demand is 1) a vigorous welfare state, 2) a redistributive tax system, 3) pro-worker labor policies -- all within capitalism and in no way antithetical do it. The actually existing social democracies have capitalist economies.Your reading for comprehension requires a little fine tuning. I never posted that Marxism is the same as socialism. What I implied was that "BOTH" concepts are expanding in the US at an alarming rate. Sanders with communism and Mamdani and AOC as democrat socialist. Both are antithetical to our original form of capitalism.
Be sure to enjoy eternity in hell with the golden bozo and the rest of the maggotsSo not being a Karen for Communism makes me dumb as fuck??? LOL Ok.![]()
I love how the people always calling me dumb and broke are also the ones who think they are entitled to my labor/property to pay for their "education" and basic needs.
LOL....which values do you think I have that are not?? Is it my lack of gay furry pride, feminism and commnism that you find so un-Christian??? Or do you find my lack of jihadi support/ass kissing that you find so un-Christian??
Also, what denomination of heretic are you?
My time today is short, so I won't be disassembling like a clock, but I'll start with the following:Sanders is no more a Communist than you are, and Mamdani and AOC are not democratic socialists even if they claim the name. All three are social democrats. The most they really demand is 1) a vigorous welfare state, 2) a redistributive tax system, 3) pro-worker labor policies -- all within capitalism and in no way antithetical do it. The actually existing social democracies have capitalist economies.
You sound pretty silly to me, discoursing on the difference between "social democrat" and "democratic socialism" like a mediaeval scholastic!My time today is short, so I won't be disassembling like a clock, but I'll start with the following:
First, the claim that Sanders, AOC, and Mamdani are merely “social democrats” ignores a basic distinction: social democracy is a capitalist system with a safety net, while democratic socialism explicitly treats capitalism as something to be transcended. Sanders himself has repeatedly said he wants to move the U.S. beyond capitalism, has praised elements of socialist regimes, and built his career inside organizations explicitly hostile to private ownership of major industries. That’s not Scandinavian pragmatism; that’s ideological hostility with better branding.
Why would I be going to hell?? I'm not a heretic like you.Be sure to enjoy eternity in hell with the golden bozo and the rest of the maggots
Fascinating.
Though "the concept of Marxism/socialism" is actually of your own making.
They are, in the real world, two separate and quite distinct ideologies.
3Blessed are the poor in spirit,
for theirs is the Kingdom of Heaven.
4Blessed are those who mourn,
for they will be comforted.
5Blessed are the meek,
for they will inherit the Earth.
6Blessed are those who hunger and thirst for righteousness,
for they will be satisfied.
7Blessed are the merciful,
for they will be shown mercy.
8Blessed are the pure in heart,
for they will see God.
9Blessed are the peacemakers,
for they will be called the Sons of God.
10Blessed are those who are persecuted because of righteousness,
for theirs is the Kingdom of Heaven.
11Blessed are you when people insult you, persecute you and falsely say all kinds of evil against you because of Me.
12Rejoice and be glad, because great is your reward in heaven, for in the same way they persecuted the prophets who were before you...
Whaddaya expect? Every word comes from some damned Jew.A heretic communist quoting scripture....... fascinating.
Oh, I know research quite well having done some myself. And I’m well aware get corrupted by their precious hypothesis or get funded by companies whose products they’re researching.Not all science is equal or as pure as you seem to think it is.
Fair to be skeptical. But what if epigenetics research, which is what I’ve been referencing, is not political. What if it’s an honest inquiry into things that are happening in our society today. As for celebrating and pimping things out I’ve heard exactly one radio segment on epigenetics and had to google for a bit more info-this research isn’t being trotted out in media to make political points. And it’s not making wild claims nor is it irrational.When "science" is totally irrational and or suddenly starts making wild claims that line up far more with political and or economic interest than observable reality??? I absolutely question that. The more corporate interest and packs of politicians I see celebrating "science" and pimping it for their own self interest? The more skeptical I get about the validity of that "science".
I agreeI encourage other independent thinking individuals to also treat "science" that's trying to "science" you for a vote or money to take a damn good look at that "science" and really ask themselves if the political and or corporate interest behind it would ever lie to you??Big Tobacco, oil, pharma....they've NEVER used "science" to benefit themselves right??? Politicians either...they'd NEVER lie.
![]()
He might say that, but Sanders never proposes any bills that would do that, or move us in that direction -- nor would he as president.My time today is short, so I won't be disassembling like a clock, but I'll start with the following:
First, the claim that Sanders, AOC, and Mamdani are merely “social democrats” ignores a basic distinction: social democracy is a capitalist system with a safety net, while democratic socialism explicitly treats capitalism as something to be transcended. Sanders himself has repeatedly said he wants to move the U.S. beyond capitalism, has praised elements of socialist regimes, and built his career inside organizations explicitly hostile to private ownership of major industries. That’s not Scandinavian pragmatism; that’s ideological hostility with better branding.
It is not in any psychologist's political or economic interest to recognize the reality of transgenderism.When "science" is totally irrational and or suddenly starts making wild claims that line up far more with political and or economic interest than observable reality??? I absolutely question that.
They're not out there, they're in here. Remember what board this is.There are perverts out there.
Oh, fuck off, traitor. We're still suffering from trickle down, ya dumb bitchThat is a big problem. Using house democrats as an example ( socialist democrats / Marxist ) never. Just give away the store. The wealth redistribution in our country is off the charts. 38 trillion in debt is quite telling.
You mean trickle down to little MogadishuOh, fuck off, traitor. We're still suffering from trickle down, ya dumb bitch
In his heart, Bernie is a Communist. That’s been obvious ever since his ideological honeymoon in Moscow, the only newlywed who came back with souvenirs, nostalgia, and a lifelong crush on central planning. Every policy he proposes is Marx in orthopedic shoes: same dogma, slower gait, louder complaints. He can rebrand it as “democratic,” “Nordic,” or “fairness with sprinkles,” but underneath that shaggy white hair and perpetual scolding is the same old fantasy, someone else pays, the state controls, and Bernie gets to wag his finger forever.He might say that, but never proposes any bills that would do that, or move us in that direction -- nor would he as president.
Only an idiot would even call them social democrats.That is a big problem. Using house democrats as an example ( socialist democrats / Marxist )
That is a better thing to be in one's heart than anything else. It would be the best kind of human society, if only it could be made to work. Every good Christian is a Communist in his heart, and every good Buddhist, too.In his heart, Bernie is a Communist.
Total horse crap. Communism isn’t “being kind in your heart”; it’s concentrating authority in the hands of people who assure you they’re virtuous while building prisons for those who disagree. Charity is voluntary. Compassion is personal. Communism replaces both with coercion and then calls it morality. As for Christianity and Buddhism, both teach humility, restraint, and moral self-discipline. Communism teaches entitlement, envy, and the holiness of other people’s labor. If every good Christian were a Communist, the commandment would read “Thou shalt outsource thy conscience to the state.”That is a better thing to be in one's heart than anything else. It would be the best kind of human society, if only it could be made to work. Every good Christian is a Communist in his heart, and every good Buddhist, too.
That's exacly what it is, to start with, in the case of every Communist including Stalin.Total horse crap. Communism isn’t “being kind in your heart”;
How many millions did he kill and starve to death?That's exacly what it is, to start with, in the case of every Communist including Stalin.
Nobody, to start with. Nobody ever joined the Party with that in mind.How many millions did he kill and starve to death?