A recent experience

Melanie needed to use the restroom first, so while she went to do that Brent and I slipped into the bedroom, where he removed his shirt and his belt. I was tempted to start sucking his cock right there, but I figured maybe a more subtle approach was in order.
 
Don't forget the part where she's pathetically grateful, and the part where her tubes are magically tied.

Also though, I wouldn't say she was classically gorgeous, but I told her so because she was definitely still attractive. Mind you she was a thicker girl, which I like, but some others may disagree with.

As for her being grateful though, I think that's only natural enough for someone who's obviously been neglected for a long time.

And when did her tubes become "magically" tied? I simply reported what she replied, which entirely makes sense as to why she wasn't worried about being filled.
 
Ahem... What he probably meant was natural 40DDs that she carried high on her 100 lbs. frame... :rolleyes:

Yeah, yeah, that's the ticket... After all this is all really true! :D

It is all literally true. However, she certainly didn't have DD's, just D's, and she wasn't 100 pounds. Probably 170-180 if I had to guess, at about 5'8 or so. And though I'm sure her breasts were all natural, I wouldn't say they were "high on her frame," though they weren't ridiculously low, either.

Humorous response though, and of course you're free to believe what you want :)
 
Okay, so it's a true story. I'm willing to accept that. And I totally get that she's a more normally pretty person, not any porn queen. I'm glad to hear it, actually.

If it's a true story, promise me that you will spend a little more energy worrying about a woman's safety when her hubby finds out she's fucked you and sends threatening emails and she disappears from view. I'm not saying you have to be her knight in shining armour, but-- it makes you seem like an unfeeling asshole who only cares that he got off.

And promise me that you'll play safe with women as well as with men. Don't splooge into anyone! Hell, filling a dude-- at least you don't have to worry about becoming a father! You didn't even think about it until I asked you! :eek:
 
Okay, so it's a true story. I'm willing to accept that. And I totally get that she's a more normally pretty person, not any porn queen. I'm glad to hear it, actually.

If it's a true story, promise me that you will spend a little more energy worrying about a woman's safety when her hubby finds out she's fucked you and sends threatening emails and she disappears from view. I'm not saying you have to be her knight in shining armour, but-- it makes you seem like an unfeeling asshole who only cares that he got off.

And promise me that you'll play safe with women as well as with men. Don't splooge into anyone! Hell, filling a dude-- at least you don't have to worry about becoming a father! You didn't even think about it until I asked you! :eek:

Believe me, it's not that I don't care--it's that I'm more or less powerless to do anything about it. I don't have a clue where she lives or even what her last name is, after all.

And rest assured, I play safe 99% of the time. It's actually pretty rare that I don't :). Also, believe me that I'd thought about it, I just hadn't vocalized that here because I felt most people would be interested primarily in the story, not its potential implications :)
 
Believe me, it's not that I don't care--it's that I'm more or less powerless to do anything about it. I don't have a clue where she lives or even what her last name is, after all.
Good to know that you care. because it was hard to tell, in your story. Don't expect people to read your mind...
And rest assured, I play safe 99% of the time. It's actually pretty rare that I don't :). Also, believe me that I'd thought about it, I just hadn't vocalized that here because I felt most people would be interested primarily in the story, not its potential implications :)
And those people wouldn't bother to say anything of course... just the minority who do-- like me.

And I always will say something. For one thing, real life stories have real life consequences, and some real woman might be in danger. For another, I'm a writer, and the story itself is unsatisfying as a story when you leave loose ends dangling at the end.

As a writer of stories, my suggestions are that you tell the reader, at the end, that you don't know where she is, you are worried, you hope she'll get in touch. Acknowledge the elephant in the livingroom.
 
Good to know that you care. because it was hard to tell, in your story. Don't expect people to read your mind...
And those people wouldn't bother to say anything of course... just the minority who do-- like me.

And I always will say something. For one thing, real life stories have real life consequences, and some real woman might be in danger. For another, I'm a writer, and the story itself is unsatisfying as a story when you leave loose ends dangling at the end.

As a writer of stories, my suggestions are that you tell the reader, at the end, that you don't know where she is, you are worried, you hope she'll get in touch. Acknowledge the elephant in the livingroom.

I could see that, and I agree the loose ends leave one wondering (see: Lost). That said, given the kind of story it is, it might have been better to simply leave of the ending bit about her hubby finding out entirely. People don't read sex stories for the consequences, after all--they read them to get aroused and maybe get off :p
 
I could see that, and I agree the loose ends leave one wondering (see: Lost). That said, given the kind of story it is, it might have been better to simply leave of the ending bit about her hubby finding out entirely. People don't read sex stories for the consequences, after all--they read them to get aroused and maybe get off :p
This is true. And if there are consequences, I don't get off, I maybe get mad at someone instead.

:) Art can imitate life but when you're making art out of life it's sometimes better to edit life a little bit.

Two ways to treat the barebacking issue;

"I want you to fill me with your come," she said.

"Darling, I'm a gay man. I wouldn't treat you less safely than I do any of my male partners. I can't fill you with my come, but I will fill you so full of love you won't miss it..."

OR:

"I want you to fill me with your come," she said.

"I don't want to get you pregnant-"

"My tubes are tied, I swear they are."

I decided to take her at her word. I know-- that's still kinda dumb, but I was beyond thinking straight at that point!


Signed-- your editor. :D
 
This is true. And if there are consequences, I don't get off, I maybe get mad at someone instead.

:) Art can imitate life but when you're making art out of life it's sometimes better to edit life a little bit.

Two ways to treat the barebacking issue;

"I want you to fill me with your come," she said.

"Darling, I'm a gay man. I wouldn't treat you less safely than I do any of my male partners. I can't fill you with my come, but I will fill you so full of love you won't miss it..."

OR:

"I want you to fill me with your come," she said.

"I don't want to get you pregnant-"

"My tubes are tied, I swear they are."

I decided to take her at her word. I know-- that's still kinda dumb, but I was beyond thinking straight at that point!


Signed-- your editor. :D

I'm trying to decide if your being sarcastic here, I would have assumed so if not for your pointless lecturing of the guy above, I mean really what gives you the right to lecture him about his sexual habits?

I know he has written this up in the style of a lit story but its (belive it or not) as far as he's concerned a real event and thus shouldn't really be judged from an editorial perspective, especially as it makes you sound like a total douche.
 
I'm not lecturing him about his habits, I'm talking about the loose threads he left in the story. He wrote it as a story, and brought it to a public forum. :) We are by this point talking about ways to edit "real life" to make it better reading, and those were a couple of suggestions. :)
 
I'm trying to decide if your being sarcastic here, I would have assumed so if not for your pointless lecturing of the guy above, I mean really what gives you the right to lecture him about his sexual habits?

I know he has written this up in the style of a lit story but its (belive it or not) as far as he's concerned a real event and thus shouldn't really be judged from an editorial perspective, especially as it makes you sound like a total douche.



Just so you know, dude, Stella has written a BOAT load of stories herself, as well as having edited numerous stories for many well know writers here on Lit and elsewheres. If she makes a constructive critique of a story, it WAY behooves people to listen to her (true OR fiction). ;)


As for "lecturing" the guy on his sexual habits???? Seriously? It was a warning, doofus. He stated that he participated in unsafe sex. If this story IS true (which I personally doubt because of a bunch of things), his sexual habits are atrocious and dangerous. People fucking die from that shit. (and yeah, being unsafe 1% of the time CAN kill a bunch of people).

Fuckin A right she should say something about that! Anyone who thinks otherwise is a disgusting, disease spreading pig.
 
A lot of folks here remind people to sex it up safely. We think healthy living perverts are more fun than sick or dead ones.

And I like my porn issue-free. Mentally shrugging off someone's possible unsafe situation is an issue that dries my pussy right up.
 
A lot of folks here remind people to sex it up safely. We think healthy living perverts are more fun than sick or dead ones.

And I like my porn issue-free. Mentally shrugging off someone's possible unsafe situation is an issue that dries my pussy right up.

Ha ha! And nobody needs/wants that! :D
 
This is true. And if there are consequences, I don't get off, I maybe get mad at someone instead.

:) Art can imitate life but when you're making art out of life it's sometimes better to edit life a little bit.

Two ways to treat the barebacking issue;

"I want you to fill me with your come," she said.

"Darling, I'm a gay man. I wouldn't treat you less safely than I do any of my male partners. I can't fill you with my come, but I will fill you so full of love you won't miss it..."

OR:

"I want you to fill me with your come," she said.

"I don't want to get you pregnant-"

"My tubes are tied, I swear they are."

I decided to take her at her word. I know-- that's still kinda dumb, but I was beyond thinking straight at that point!


Signed-- your editor. :D

LOL thanks. Although I'm not gay, just bi, LOL
 
Just so you know, dude, Stella has written a BOAT load of stories herself, as well as having edited numerous stories for many well know writers here on Lit and elsewheres. If she makes a constructive critique of a story, it WAY behooves people to listen to her (true OR fiction). ;)


As for "lecturing" the guy on his sexual habits???? Seriously? It was a warning, doofus. He stated that he participated in unsafe sex. If this story IS true (which I personally doubt because of a bunch of things), his sexual habits are atrocious and dangerous. People fucking die from that shit. (and yeah, being unsafe 1% of the time CAN kill a bunch of people).

Fuckin A right she should say something about that! Anyone who thinks otherwise is a disgusting, disease spreading pig.

*ahem*. First, it's entirely a true story whether you believe it or not. Second, I'm fine with editing and suggestions, as should be anyone who posts a story. Third, yes, it was a bit risky to bareback her, but given her status having not had any activity but her own husband for somewhere around a decade, I figured she was probably safe enough. There's nothing disgusting or atrocious about that. Unwise, perhaps, but not disgusting.

Relax :)
 
*ahem*. First, it's entirely a true story whether you believe it or not. Second, I'm fine with editing and suggestions, as should be anyone who posts a story. Third, yes, it was a bit risky to bareback her, but given her status having not had any activity but her own husband for somewhere around a decade, I figured she was probably safe enough. There's nothing disgusting or atrocious about that. Unwise, perhaps, but not disgusting.

Relax :)



Sure, relax. IF this is true then your "bit risky" could have killed somebody, dude. That .10% unprotected sex you admitted to previously dangerous to all of you.

Oh, IMO it isn't just "unwise" to expose somebody to the STDs and/or HIV, it IS disgusting. Just say'in.

BTW, being bisexual doesn't mean shit, as far as being protected from STDs and/or HIV.

Peter Carr, the manager of the STD and HIV Section of the Health Department, said syphilis cases also rose to a 30-year high of nearly 350 cases.

"And that's driven almost exclusively by increases among gay and bisexual men,"

Link to April 2011 MPR Article
 
I wasn't worried about her being safe for you, I was worried about you being safe for her.

Bisexual men pass STD's along to women. Women almost never pass STD's along to men. The vagina just doesn't work that way. It can't abrade the skin of a prick to make it vulnerable to blood-borne deseases.

Also, men get women pregnant. Women almost never get men pregnant.

Please, engage your brain.
 
Just so you know, dude, Stella has written a BOAT load of stories herself, as well as having edited numerous stories for many well know writers here on Lit and elsewheres. If she makes a constructive critique of a story, it WAY behooves people to listen to her (true OR fiction). ;)


As for "lecturing" the guy on his sexual habits???? Seriously? It was a warning, doofus. He stated that he participated in unsafe sex. If this story IS true (which I personally doubt because of a bunch of things), his sexual habits are atrocious and dangerous. People fucking die from that shit. (and yeah, being unsafe 1% of the time CAN kill a bunch of people).

Fuckin A right she should say something about that! Anyone who thinks otherwise is a disgusting, disease spreading pig.

So the women in question has no responsibility in this matter? Three consenting adults made the choice to have unprotected sex and they are the ones who will suffer the consequences of their actions.
 
I wasn't worried about her being safe for you, I was worried about you being safe for her.

Bisexual men pass STD's along to women. Women almost never pass STD's along to men. The vagina just doesn't work that way. It can't abrade the skin of a prick to make it vulnerable to blood-borne deseases.

Also, men get women pregnant. Women almost never get men pregnant.

Please, engage your brain.

I understood that, LOL. I know the risks and I know who's more likely to give what to whom. I'm clean--that i know for a fact, as I get tested at least twice yearly and just had a test in March. She was the wildcard in the scenario, and knowing that women nearly never pass diseases to men, I judged it to be not a huge risk.

Jeez, if I'd realized it would turn into the fucking inquisition I wouldn't have posted it here at all. God forbid somebody want to tell an honest story rather than the contrived bullshit that usually makes it on this site.
 
So the women in question has no responsibility in this matter? Three consenting adults made the choice to have unprotected sex and they are the ones who will suffer the consequences of their actions.

And at that, none of us are suffering anything. Jesus, does everyone have to panic?
 
Sure, relax. IF this is true then your "bit risky" could have killed somebody, dude. That .10% unprotected sex you admitted to previously dangerous to all of you.

Oh, IMO it isn't just "unwise" to expose somebody to the STDs and/or HIV, it IS disgusting. Just say'in.

BTW, being bisexual doesn't mean shit, as far as being protected from STDs and/or HIV.



Link to April 2011 MPR Article

Thanks for your opinion. I'm well aware of the statistics and the issues.

Please move along now.
 
Thanks for your opinion. I'm well aware of the statistics and the issues.

Please move along now.

Ya know you were going along just fine until you added that last sentence and decided to get all pissy and footstompy.

Now I'm just going to stick around and call you on all of your bullshit.
 
Well what worries me is that vicious controlling abusing husband, she is well shot of him but has she taken precautions.

Did she go to a women's shelter?

Did she get a restraining order on him?
 
I understood that, LOL. I know the risks and I know who's more likely to give what to whom. I'm clean--that i know for a fact, as I get tested at least twice yearly and just had a test in March. She was the wildcard in the scenario, and knowing that women nearly never pass diseases to men, I judged it to be not a huge risk.

Jeez, if I'd realized it would turn into the fucking inquisition I wouldn't have posted it here at all. God forbid somebody want to tell an honest story rather than the contrived bullshit that usually makes it on this site.
That is always the risk you take when you tell a story on a public space.

You would get the same reaction if you'd posted it to the stories section. Someone might show up at your blog and ask the same questions that I've asked.

yes, the woman has just as much responsibility as you do-- but she isn't the one telling the story. Even if you made it clear that she, or you, sluffed off, at least that would provide an explanation. Just make sure you tie the loose ends, that's all. Readers hate loose ends. They hate loose ends worse than they hate unhappy endings.
 
Ya know you were going along just fine until you added that last sentence and decided to get all pissy and footstompy.

Now I'm just going to stick around and call you on all of your bullshit.

Actually the only person in this thread who's pissy and foot stompy is you. If you have any sort of decency whatsoever, you'll leave it alone and walk away.
 
Back
Top