View Recent posts!
https://tags.literotica.com/ai a new era/
https://tags.literotica.com/ai a new era/
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
For better or worse, my submission is in! How is everyone else doing?
Mine posted a few days back.
I just noticed that of the five stories posted so far, every one is in a different category: TG/CD, EC, Novels/Novellas, SF/F, and Romance. Nice to see people taking it in so many directions!
Mine posted a few days back.
I just noticed that of the five stories posted so far, every one is in a different category: TG/CD, EC, Novels/Novellas, SF/F, and Romance. Nice to see people taking it in so many directions!
@juanasalsa
**Excellent**
I put my story in toys and masturbation but it looks like it's been moved into illustrated. I hope that illustrated readers don't mind that there's only one image in a 13k word story.
I put my story in toys and masturbation but it looks like it's been moved into illustrated. I hope that illustrated readers don't mind that there's only one image in a 13k word story.
I’ve looked through the underlying HTML for stories and there are some specifics for any inline illustration. I’ve seen mention on here that those need to be manually processed. In which case, if there’s even a single included illustration, picture, etc., it’ll probably go there.
I’ve not read there extensively, but some seemed to have very few pictures. Can’t say only one, but close to.
If my supposition is correct, to move it you may need to lose the illustration. Your choice.
You could just send a pm to Laurel asking her to change the category. Alternatively, or if she won’t change it, have it deleted. Then remove the illustration and resubmit it to T&M.
Wow! You really landed on an issue. Of course Lit doesn't have the resources to tackle it, but that's amazing. I heard about that website in this one article that was creepy a.f.
Deepfake used to attack activist couple shows new disinformation frontier https://reut.rs/3h0e60b
Right? Saw this one article “Feeling unproductive? Maybe you should stop overthinking" & blew it off as stupid. Then later discovered it was AI bravo sierra. And here's the story:
"The trick to generating content without the need for much editing was understanding GPT-3’s strengths and weaknesses. “It's quite good at making pretty language, and it's not very good at being logical and rational,” says Porr. So he picked a popular blog category that doesn’t require rigorous logic: productivity and self-help."
https://www.technologyreview.com/2020/08/14/1006780/ai-gpt-3-fake-blog-reached-top-of-hacker-news/
So I got a note back this morning that the AI generated image can't be posted because I did not create it. I removed the image and edited the story so it works without, then re-submitted to toys and masturbation.
I find this a fascinating issue of image rights and usage that is sure to be continually evolving as AI image generation programs are freely available everywhere.
How much does the AI programmer(s) own the image and how much does the image curator who sorted through (in this case probably 50-60 AI generated images) to find just the right one, own it?
Anyway, I'm just enjoying this new twist on AI content and thought I'd share. It's too bad that I can't share the final AI generated face I selected, I could have just pretended that it had generated the one I liked instead of going through lots of refreshes on thispersondoesnotexist.com, lol. But, well that was fascinating anyway, to see where the program did well and where it had issues. Ears seem to a challenge for it.
I'm interested in this. Is the AI image something GAN-generated? I've been using the term "GAN" for about a year now because of something a friend told me (agh!) and just for the first time got half an inkling of what it really is by reading Bramblethorn's excellent Loss Function.