Pure
Fiel a Verdad
- Joined
- Dec 20, 2001
- Posts
- 15,135
Hi Boota,
When I saw the symptoms of depression listed in that pamphlet, I recognized a lot of that in myself. But I recognized a lot of it in everyone. Going by what they listed, I don't think I know anyone who isn't depressed. In fact, I believe that MOST people's lives are just barely good enough to prevent suicide.
Since I admire your writing and would like you to stick around for a bit and write some more, I'm dropping you a line.
I think you're right in philosophical and factual terms, though I'd qualify the statement a bit: Most people's lives, *if faced up to* would barely keep them from going over the edge. This is the 'quiet desperation' often noted.
One thing I like about your postings is that you do have certain tasks you're working on. That orientation is excellent and certainly 'beats' the 'where is my happiness?' orientation. In truth no happiness is actually, in universal terms, "deserved." The tasks we set ourselves keep us going.
There is no such thing as the bare minimum of happiness or freedom from pain to which each human is entitled because of the 'goodness' or 'providence' of the universe. Infant mortality stats demonstrate that pretty well.
Here's which dr m's comment comes in. IF you--a drug company or psychiatrist--set the criteria cleverly, you can get a diagnosis of just about anything, pretty easily. To get 'anxiety disorder', just ask, "Do you worry...?" "Do you even think something bad is going to happen?" The 'test', as the dr. says is *designed* to generate 'false positives', to show as many as possible in need of something, e.g, an antidepressant pill costing 1-3 dollars a day for the rest of a life.
But there is a general point: What is the criterion you are employing in deciding the 'worthwhileness' or 'shittiness' or plain 'boringness beyond tolerability' of things? In truth you have no objective basis for assigning any set point-- i.e., below which suicide is indicated.
Further, not to 'shrink' you excessively
but usually there is a sense of justice or entitlement hanging around somewhere in depressed or suicidal musings: This should not be happening to me. It's not fair., etc. ** But again, as argued above, there is no objective basis for saying "I'm getting less return or compensation for X..., than is fair." An acquaintance of mine was killed in a traffic accident a few months before what was to be the awarding of a PhD and while his wife was pregnant with their first child. One's Platinum Album/CD may come the day after one's untimely demise. Yes we said my friend's end was 'tragic' and even 'undeserved' but, really, who's to say?
Here's where the chemistry may come in. Since there's no objective basis for saying "There's too much pain.. " or ".. too much boredom" or "less return on efforts than is just", it's often a conclusion rooted in mood, which in turn is chemically based. On a 'bad day' the indications will appear add up to "life is not worth living", but the same indications will look different in an hour or a day. Has the universe changed? No. Merely the chemicals tingeing its look. Ergo. They may be worth tinkering with.
Best,
J.
**These ideas often underlie or fuel the anger that many depressed persons have, just under the surface.
When I saw the symptoms of depression listed in that pamphlet, I recognized a lot of that in myself. But I recognized a lot of it in everyone. Going by what they listed, I don't think I know anyone who isn't depressed. In fact, I believe that MOST people's lives are just barely good enough to prevent suicide.
Since I admire your writing and would like you to stick around for a bit and write some more, I'm dropping you a line.
I think you're right in philosophical and factual terms, though I'd qualify the statement a bit: Most people's lives, *if faced up to* would barely keep them from going over the edge. This is the 'quiet desperation' often noted.
One thing I like about your postings is that you do have certain tasks you're working on. That orientation is excellent and certainly 'beats' the 'where is my happiness?' orientation. In truth no happiness is actually, in universal terms, "deserved." The tasks we set ourselves keep us going.
There is no such thing as the bare minimum of happiness or freedom from pain to which each human is entitled because of the 'goodness' or 'providence' of the universe. Infant mortality stats demonstrate that pretty well.
Here's which dr m's comment comes in. IF you--a drug company or psychiatrist--set the criteria cleverly, you can get a diagnosis of just about anything, pretty easily. To get 'anxiety disorder', just ask, "Do you worry...?" "Do you even think something bad is going to happen?" The 'test', as the dr. says is *designed* to generate 'false positives', to show as many as possible in need of something, e.g, an antidepressant pill costing 1-3 dollars a day for the rest of a life.
But there is a general point: What is the criterion you are employing in deciding the 'worthwhileness' or 'shittiness' or plain 'boringness beyond tolerability' of things? In truth you have no objective basis for assigning any set point-- i.e., below which suicide is indicated.
Further, not to 'shrink' you excessively
Here's where the chemistry may come in. Since there's no objective basis for saying "There's too much pain.. " or ".. too much boredom" or "less return on efforts than is just", it's often a conclusion rooted in mood, which in turn is chemically based. On a 'bad day' the indications will appear add up to "life is not worth living", but the same indications will look different in an hour or a day. Has the universe changed? No. Merely the chemicals tingeing its look. Ergo. They may be worth tinkering with.
Best,
J.
**These ideas often underlie or fuel the anger that many depressed persons have, just under the surface.
Last edited:
