Another synagogue shooting

[HisArpy]

Not referring to friends or associates, I used "I" by default.
Just to every day interactions.
I have the feeling that people are getting overall more careful and suspicious of each other.

People have always been suspicious of strangers. I think what has happened is that social media has allowed the disaffected a platform to voice their disaffection. That call is being adopted by others with weak will and poor mental acumen and then projected upon all others through the natural suspicion processes of the human condition.

IOW, it's probably not you, it's them. 'Cuz they're wierdos.

 

[Que]

As much as I prefer GB conservatives' attitudes:

Trump's rhetoric IS inflammatory and stirred up White nationalism, even in Australia and Europe.
I don't think he does it intentionally, but the result is just the same.

ISIS and then Angela Merkel ignited the fire, Trump's rhetoric added to it.

No it isn't. Quit parroting nonsense.

That stuff is just something that dems say every election cycle to scare people of color to the poles. They have nothing to offer but fear itself.

 

[RobDownSouth]

Quoted because Dear Lordy.

Mean ole Silver Gurl triggered not one but two rape enablers this morning: Queew and Timmeh. If she can somehow manage to trigger the Housesquaw, she'd have a rare Rape Trigger Trifecta.

"It's not rape if she didn't fight back!"
"Whar are the bruises?"
"What was she wearing?"
"How much did she have to drink?"

 

[bbx56]

As much as I prefer GB conservatives' attitudes:

Trump's rhetoric IS inflammatory and stirred up White nationalism, even in Australia and Europe.
I don't think he does it intentionally, but the result is just the same.

ISIS and then Angela Merkel ignited the fire, Trump's rhetoric added to it.

tell us WHAT HE HAS SAID THAT IS "INFLAMMATORY"

I bet you cant, you are just mouthing BS

 

[HisArpy]

All I've seen on the local news is an "AR style rifle." has it been positively identified as an AR-15? In any case, the only thing that really matters is the mentally defective human being behind it. How and where was he radicalized?

I think a better question is how and where were the police and family members while he was winding up enough to go off the cliff like he did?

Society claims it cares. Until you examine the preceding facts. Then you realize that the only thing society cares about is blaming you for the acts of another. It's a twofer for them. They get to exert social and moral authority over someone they otherwise have no ability to deal with.

 

[butters]

que's in full-defence denial mode

trump would be so proud

 

[Que]

Mean ole Silver Gurl triggered not one but two rape enablers this morning: Queew and Timmeh. If she can somehow manage to trigger the Housesquaw, she'd have a rare Rape Trigger Trifecta.

"It's not rape if she didn't fight back!"
"Whar are the bruises?"
"What was she wearing?"
"How much did she have to drink?"

Just because you cannot elicit consent without paying for it doesn't make it rape, your creepy fantasies, notwithstanding.

 

[HisArpy]

Mean ole Silver Gurl triggered not one but two rape enablers this morning: Queew and Timmeh. If she can somehow manage to trigger the Housesquaw, she'd have a rare Rape Trigger Trifecta.

"It's not rape if she didn't fight back!"
"Whar are the bruises?"
"What was she wearing?"
"How much did she have to drink?"

My, my, the sun is sure shining is your alternative universe today.

Meanwhile, back in reality...

 

[Ann_Tagonist]

Mean ole Silver Gurl triggered not one but two rape enablers this morning: Queew and Timmeh. If she can somehow manage to trigger the Housesquaw, she'd have a rare Rape Trigger Trifecta.

"It's not rape if she didn't fight back!"
"Whar are the bruises?"
"What was she wearing?"
"How much did she have to drink?"

Nobody out misogynists LBJ.

 

[beew]

No it isn't. Quit parroting nonsense.

That stuff is just something that dems say every election cycle to scare people of color to the poles. They have nothing to offer but fear itself.

I don't think he's doing it on purpose, I don't think he's a racist. (other than his desire to enrich the already rich, I Do think that he has good intentions for All Americans).

But one can't ignore the fact that his misguided rhetoric has been used in the manifestos of so many White supremacists from different countries..

 

[Carnal_Flower]

If that's true, then it makes sense to take guns away from sick people. When they're all cured, they can get them back.

I know it's hard to accept, but this has nothing to do with guns. Americans are a sick and evil people. You can point to other countries and societies. It isn't about their gun laws ;it is about their people. Guns have always been in American society; perhaps more so in the past than now. My local community vividly remembers when the rifle team carried their rifles on the school bus. It was never a concern because the students were not mentally ill. They respected life. Gun racks in the back of pick-ups in the school parking lot. Nothing will change unless the people change. the solution to this is in the mirror. How do we raise our children? How do men and women relate? Do we believe n the sanctity of human life and the power that bestows that sanctity. It really is us, and that's hard to admit. You can regulate guns all you want. We are still a sick society.

 

[Que]

que's in full-defence denial mode

trump would be so proud

First of all this is America and we spell it "defense" if you're going to come to America you should at least try to learn the language.

We also are a nation of laws where actual words in a legal sense have actual meaning and you don't get to make up new meanings for those words when you're talking about actual crimes.

"Sexual assault" has an actual meaning and it can't be done with consent. It requires non-consent for it to be assault. By definition. Always.

"I'm automatically attracted to beautiful [women]—I just start kissing them. It's like a magnet. Just kiss. I don't even wait. And when you're a star they let you do it. You can do anything ... Grab them by the pussy. You can do anything."

Bragging about things he claims women *let* him do is not "sexual assault." As I said.

 

[bbx56]

I don't think he's doing it on purpose, I don't think he's a racist. (other than his desire to enrich the already rich, I Do think that he has good intentions for All Americans).

But one can't ignore the fact that his misguided rhetoric has been used in the manifestos of so many White supremacists from different countries..

why is it you cant answer a simple quetion?

why do you just repeat the same shit

WHAT DID HE OR DOES HE SAY THAT IS INFALLMATORY?

 

[bbx56]

First of all this is America and we spell it "defense" if you're going to come to America to mooch off of us you should at least learn the language.

We also are a nation of laws where actual words in a legal sense have actual meaning and you don't get to make up new meanings for those words when you're talking about actual crimes.

"Sexual assault" has an actual meaning and it can't be done with consent. It requires non-consent for it to be a salt. By definition. Always.

"I'm automatically attracted to beautiful [women]—I just start kissing them. It's like a magnet. Just kiss. I don't even wait. And when you're a star they let you do it. You can do anything ... Grab them by the pussy. You can do anything."

Bragging about things he claims women *let* him do is not "sexual assault." As I said.

2shay~

 

[beew]

why is it you cant answer a simple quetion?

why do you just repeat the same shit

WHAT DID HE OR DOES HE SAY THAT IS INFALLMATORY?

So histrionic.

 

[Ann_Tagonist]

If that's true, then it makes sense to take guns away from sick people. When they're all cured, they can get them back.

Already a law.


Under 18 U.S.C. § 922(d), it is unlawful for any person to sell or otherwise dispose of any firearm or ammunition to any person knowing or having reasonable cause to believe that such person “has been adjudicated as a mental defective or has been committed to any mental institution.”

 

[bbx56]

So histrionic.

you still didnt answer

you DID write his words were infammatory

WHAT WORDS did he say or DOES say that is

tell us,

 

[Que]

I don't think he's doing it on purpose, I don't think he's a racist. (other than his desire to enrich the already rich, I Do think that he has good intentions for All Americans).

But one can't ignore the fact that his misguided rhetoric has been used in the manifestos of so many White supremacists from different countries..

He isn't *doing* it, on purpose or otherwise. Partial quotes and conflating things he says to mean things that he clearly did not his not him doing anything at all.

You parroting that nonsense doesn't make his statements something that they aren't, something the Dems wish he actually said.

Pull an actual quote in full context or STFU.

 

[HisArpy]

I don't think he's doing it on purpose, I don't think he's a racist. (other than his desire to enrich the already rich, I Do think that he has good intentions for All Americans).

But one can't ignore the fact that his misguided rhetoric has been used in the manifestos of so many White supremacists from different countries..

What another does is not the fault of one who speaks unless the speech is intended to achieve the desired acts by others.

Trump's been said to do all kinds of horrible things. Yet, now that we know from the Mueller report that at least 1 of those things was fake news, one MUST wonder whether the rest is of similar elk.

Go back and examine his speeches and see for yourself. I'll bet you that you cannot find a single example of Trump actually endorsing any of the racist things the MSM says he does.

What you WILL find is the MSM saying "he said X" when in fact he didn't. They are using their false narrative on what was said to promote a specific anti-Trump agenda. And almost everyone fell for it. What's worse is that despite it all starting to fall apart for them, the progressives are STILL spouting the same lies.

Gullible but tenacious is probably the most polite descriptor I can think of. Flaming idjits more accurately described them though.

 

[cowslinger64]

What another does is not the fault of one who speaks unless the speech is intended to achieve the desired acts by others.

Trump's been said to do all kinds of horrible things. Yet, now that we know from the Mueller report that at least 1 of those things was fake news, one MUST wonder whether the rest is of similar elk.

Go back and examine his speeches and see for yourself. I'll bet you that you cannot find a single example of Trump actually endorsing any of the racist things the MSM says he does.

What you WILL find is the MSM saying "he said X" when in fact he didn't. They are using their false narrative on what was said to promote a specific anti-Trump agenda. And almost everyone fell for it. What's worse is that despite it all starting to fall apart for them, the progressives are STILL spouting the same lies.

Gullible but tenacious is probably the most polite descriptor I can think of. Flaming idjits more accurately described them though.

Lol...seriously??

What would that ONE thing be? And FYI, if you say collusion, you fail miserably. Again.

Trump said he was exonerated.. Mueller did not. Who do you believe?


Btw.. in true queballesque style, it's ILK, not elk.



ilk
/ilk/
noun
a type of people or things similar to those already referred to.
"the veiled suggestions that reporters of his ilk seem to be so good at"
synonyms: type, sort, class, category, group, set, bracket, genre, kidney, grain, species, race, strain, vintage, make, model, brand, stamp, variety, family
"Mrs. Taylor and her ilk talk utter tripe"

 

[Rightguide]

As much as I prefer GB conservatives' attitudes:

Trump's rhetoric IS inflammatory and stirred up White nationalism, even in Australia and Europe.
I don't think he does it intentionally, but the result is just the same.

ISIS and then Angela Merkel ignited the fire, Trump's rhetoric added to it.

That isn't true, beew. Don't be a victim of left wing group think. Trump hasn't done a thing to drum up hatred for Jews or people of color, nothing whatsoever.

I would say attacks on the west, western civilization and it's religions, by Islam over the last decade has done more to drum up intolerance than anything Trump could have accomplished in two years of tweeting or speaking.

In France alone over the last year or so over 800 Christian churches have been attacked, defaced, or destroyed. Jews all over the world, especially in France, have been attacked in the streets as new waves of antisemitism sweep through Europe and elsewhere. In the last ten years hundreds of thousands of Christians have been butchered in the Middle East. These religious and cultural wars have been brewing for decades and are playing out as we speak on many levels. All of it with a Genesis older than Trump.

 

[dolf]

Here we go again. Another mass shooting in America, and the reaction looks to be the same as after every other mass shooting in America. The Dems are poopy heads and it's all their fault. The Repubs are doodoo brains and they are to blame. Golly gosh, I wonder how they're going to react to next week's mass shooting in America

 

[HisArpy]

Lol...seriously??

What would that ONE thing be? And FYI, if you say collusion, you fail miserably. Again.

Trump said he was exonerated.. Mueller did not. Who do you believe?


Btw.. in true queballesque style, it's ILK, not elk.



ilk
/ilk/
noun
a type of people or things similar to those already referred to.
"the veiled suggestions that reporters of his ilk seem to be so good at"
synonyms: type, sort, class, category, group, set, bracket, genre, kidney, grain, species, race, strain, vintage, make, model, brand, stamp, variety, family
"Mrs. Taylor and her ilk talk utter tripe"

Total.

Fucking.

Fail.

But then, considering it's you, that's probably a gold star worthy attempt at rationality so I'll spare you the dudly award this time.

BTW, "elk" has become an idiom on this board for "ilk". Unfortunately for you, you missed that too. Try to keep up with the rest of the class.

 

[bbx56]

you still didnt answer

you DID write his words were infammatory

WHAT WORDS did he say or DOES say that is

tell us,

 

[someoneyouknow]

As much as I prefer GB conservatives' attitudes:

Trump's rhetoric IS inflammatory and stirred up White nationalism, even in Australia and Europe.
I don't think he does it intentionally, but the result is just the same.

ISIS and then Angela Merkel ignited the fire, Trump's rhetoric added to it.

Stop making excuses. ISIS and Merkel have nothing to do with this. This is on the con artist, pure and simple.

He has defunded programs designed to counter white supremacists, has undone decades of work in law enforcement to go after the groups, and continues to blame illegal immigrants but says nothing when white supremacists gun people OR U.S. citizens kill thousands each year.

Even this time, instead of explicitly stating white supremacists are a menace or this was a terror attack, all he says is, "Hated must be stopped", then goes on to pour out hate on his latest twat.

The only one responsible is the con artist and his acceptance that these terrorists aren't really bad people and his abject unwillingness to say anything bad about them, let alone go after them.