HornyHenry said:This has bothered me for a while and I wanted to say something about it.
This, and I believe, at least another post, refers to the man as being "Blessed", meaning larger than average.
Blessed, meaning God "Blessed" him with something more satisfying to women than those smaller, non-blessed men.
And you would rather have him to be "Blessed" than not, right?
This is not an attack. Only pointing out that what people say and what they really desire may be separate things.
I had an old GF who had a "Gaping hole", which she said was from her Ex being overly "Blessed". She was dry too so it was just as well that it was huge. lol![]()
I think that the quicker the above and similar comments from other forums that we are seeing as contradictory are understood, the better. It would appear that all of us with small cocks are masochists who want to hear women confirm our suspicions that a small cock is totally useless to them in addition to not being aesthetic, sexy, and every other uncomplimentary adjective that you can think of.
What I am understanding from the patient and honest comments from the ladies of Lit in this thread, is that a small cock isn't normally a show stopper in itself but our attitude about it could very well be.
Thank goodness, we are made up of far more than just a penis.
Ladies, is the above more or less correct?
P.S. HornyHenry, I actually, have enjoyed many what you might call "Gaping holes" in the past and believe me they were never a show stoppers either.
I enjoyed each and every one even with my miniature cock and I did my best to be sure that they did, too.
) and with them I found 3 things to be true: -