Britva415
"Alabaster," my ass
- Joined
- Nov 19, 2022
- Posts
- 6,706
So, she's a furry?she asked me, "So, would you like having sex with a furry?"
testing the waters, sounds like
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
So, she's a furry?she asked me, "So, would you like having sex with a furry?"
I caught one THIS bigthe caliber of the fish in the pool
At the very least, you are furry-curious, right? Right?Exactly one person in my life knows I write this type of erotica. She's been fairly supportive, though the amount of "So, you're a furry? No? You're sure? But what about-" for the first few days was exhausting.
The outfits are uncomfy.
And then literally this weekend (two months into the whole she knows I write anthro erotica thing) she asked me, "So, would you like having sex with a furry?"
I mean...
"Soooo, say, if I dressed up in a furry costume. Purely hypothetical, of course..."So, she's a furry?
testing the waters, sounds like
I'm definitely curious, or so everyone keeps telling me.At the very least, you are furry-curious, right? Right?
I once knew a guy who liked to dress in fursuits and go to furry raves, but he said he wasn't a furry because he didn't have a fursona, so...Exactly one person in my life knows I write this type of erotica. She's been fairly supportive, though the amount of "So, you're a furry? No? You're sure? But what about-" for the first few days was exhausting.
The outfits are uncomfy.
And then literally this weekend (two months into the whole she knows I write anthro erotica thing) she asked me, "So, would you like having sex with a furry?"
I mean...
It's entirely possible I'm a furry, but the animal I like to dress up as is human. It would explain a lot.I once knew a guy who liked to dress in fursuits and go to furry raves, but he said he wasn't a furry because he didn't have a fursona, so...
The definition varies quite literally from person to person, and it really just boils down to whether or not you identify as a furry.It's entirely possible I'm a furry, but the animal I like to dress up as is human. It would explain a lot.
I'm definitely not an actual fur. No desire to dress up, no fursona. I just really enjoy non-human erotica for a lot of complicated reasons that I slowly pieced together over the years of heavy self-psychoanalysis.The definition varies quite literally from person to person, and it really just boils down to whether or not you identify as a furry.
I personally, really enjoy furry art and stories, but I don't have a fursona so I also wouldn't say that I'm a furry. Although, other people would.
It's a very confusing term.
I really don't feel like "men take up an activity to get chicks" is newsworthy in any way.I was reading an article in USA Today, entitled,"Men are picking up 'attraction hobbies' to get dates. Does it work?"
Some of us carefully cultivate an image of being ineffable.I dunno, I think most of us would enjoy getting F'd.
Judging by the readership numbers of I/T, this might make you wildly popular...We should conduct an experiment on this. Everybody sign up for an online dating service, and in your profile mention that you write erotic stories online. See how you do.
I have a hunch about how "I write stories about mom-son incest at Literotica" will impact my dating success.
It might help if your mom joined the dating service, too. I mean…We should conduct an experiment on this. Everybody sign up for an online dating service, and in your profile mention that you write erotic stories online. See how you do.
I have a hunch about how "I write stories about mom-son incest at Literotica" will impact my dating success.
Leave Mom out of it. She's got enough on her plate with the long shopping list I gave her for the visit to the sex toy store.It might help if your mom joined the dating service, too. I mean…![]()
Interesting, I would see it as the reverse - the ones who aren't good at it are the performative ones while the ones who are good at it are good at it because there's some sincerity and authenticity in their involvement in the activities they pick.I really don't feel like "men take up an activity to get chicks" is newsworthy in any way.
I also feel like "performative" is an epithet that men who aren't good at picking activities to get chicks apply to men who are good at it (which largely means it's a complaint the sort of cunt who blathers about being an "alpha male" has about dudes who can read). No shade to the OP.
Both can be true. The two of you are talking about an idiosyncratic usage of the same word to mean two different things by two disjoint (albeit fuzzy) sets of people.Interesting, I would see it as the reverse - the ones who aren't good at it are the performative ones while the ones who are good at it are good at it because there's some sincerity and authenticity in their involvement in the activities they pick.
Yep, they can both be true.Both can be true. The two of you are talking about an idiosyncratic usage of the same word to mean two different things by two disjoint (albeit fuzzy) sets of people.
I was trying to figure out a way of saying something similar, but you said it well so I'll just say, "Yep."Both can be true. The two of you are talking about an idiosyncratic usage of the same word to mean two different things by two disjoint (albeit fuzzy) sets of people.