ll74
Your Best Friend
- Joined
- Aug 22, 2013
- Posts
- 72,977
Valid point. Perhaps the teacher's unions shouldn't have picked this fight.
They didn't pick that fight.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Valid point. Perhaps the teacher's unions shouldn't have picked this fight.
I'm not talking about poor vs rich. I'm talking about funding for public schools improperly being used for private schools.
But continue to relate it how you want without involving me.
Change the law so the money follows the kid and there isn't a thing improper about it.
What makes government schools think they have a permanent claim on our money independent of the job they do? They do not.
Not being able to parse your own words is a tell-tale sign of senility.
Also,
https://i.imgur.com/xaE83aL.jpg?1
It is already happening via vouchers. Private schools already have money. Taking more money from schools that don't have other sources of income (like private schools do) doesn't benefit students.
"Guns, bullets, range, civil war, guns, cockroaches, Wuhan, blacks kill more blacks than anyone else" rinse and repeat.
Maybe you batter read it again, dopeyfuckknuckle.
He'll catch up with the other racists at his FBI Friday breakfast.
The more money they lose, the more incentive to shape up. There's no incentive to improve your product if you're a monopoly.
If 70% of the planes that took off crashed, this would be a common occurrence. And in CA, with 70% of black kids not able to read at grade level, the public school plane is crashing more than it is getting to its destination.
You whataboutism game is strong today, loser.
The more money they lose, the more incentive to shape up. There's no incentive to improve your product if you're a monopoly.
Maybe you think 70% failure is just fine. They're just black kids, right?
Me, I think that's an abysmal record and they should go out of business.
Maybe you think 70% failure is just fine. They're just black kids, right?
Me, I think that's an abysmal record and they should go out of business.
Parses just fine to me.
The whole "withholding money until you improve" concept is the stupidest brain trust in history.
No, it's totally unacceptable. Now what?
How about we let parents give it to someone who will do the job?
It's more or less the Berlin Wall ethic: If you let them leave, they will.
So what should schools do? And please be specific.
The whole "withholding money until you improve" concept is the stupidest brain trust in history.
Dafuq do you mean?
If the money follows the kid, then wherever the kid goes, the money follows. Simple.
No idea, myself. Just as I don't know what a maker of widgets ought to do when he's cranking out substandard units. It's his job to figure that out, not mine. But until he does, I'll go elsewhere.
No one said anything about withholding money. If the child leaves, the money leaves with that child. You don't keep throwing money at a problem and expect it to improve, when there is no incentive to change. A monopoly has no incentive to change. That's why we have laws against monopolies in the private sector.
I ask again - How does one give money to a public school?
It certainly works in the commercial sector, doesn't it?
Glad we closed that out then. Schools are turning out graduates, so there's no problem.