It is when the Democrats are using it to force the public exposure of private conversations of a President of the United States.
Any privilege attached to that ended with Trump's term.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It is when the Democrats are using it to force the public exposure of private conversations of a President of the United States.
He was asserting that this was an illegal subpoena.
Now fuck off.
Any privilege attached to that ended with Trump's term.
The SCOTUS has never ruled on that to my knowledge. Classified info is classified info until declassified.
The Daily Beast ✓
Twitter › thedailybeast
Federal authorities released Steve Bannon on his own recognizance Monday afternoon
hours after he surrendered to face charges of contempt of Congress—though they
confiscated his passport and limited his ability to travel.
36 minutes ago
(Does Steve Bannon have a secret identity, and passports to match ?)
(Does Steve Bannon have a secret identity, and passports to match ?)
Classified is not the same as privileged
Another Soviet style Democrat show trial.
They are more than just classified. Under what concept of law would Nancy Pelosi have to reveal her private conversations, or those of the SCOTUS?
They are more than just classified. Under what concept of law would Nancy Pelosi have to reveal her private conversations, or those of the SCOTUS?
If Pelosi were under investigation for some sort of malfeasance in office, any "private conversations" connected with her official duties would be discoverable.
She would never be under congressional investigation for anything regardless if guilt.
So what is the penalty for contempt of Congress and how many people have been imprisoned for it?
The criminal offense of contempt of Congress sets the penalty at not less than one month nor more than twelve months in jail and a fine of not more than $100,000 or less than $100
thnx, wiki, though there are plentiful sources that state the same thingExecutive privilege
Executive privilege is the right of the president of the United States and other members of the executive branch to maintain confidential communications under certain circumstances within the executive branch and to resist some subpoenas and other oversight by the legislative and judicial branches of government in pursuit of particular information or personnel relating to those confidential communications. The right comes into effect when revealing information would impair governmental functions. Neither executive privilege nor the oversight power of Congress is explicitly mentioned in the United States Constitution. However, the Supreme Court of the United States has ruled that executive privilege and congressional oversight each are a consequence of the doctrine of the separation of powers, derived from the supremacy of each branch in its own area of Constitutional activity.
Let's see how a claim of executive privilege works out when the executive was trying to conduct a coup against the United States. What happens is what happens. No Trumpette whining will change that.
Let's go Bannon.
Nothing will happen. Nothing ever does. The US is too corrupt.
Let's see how a claim of executive privilege works out when the executive was trying to conduct a coup against the United States. What happens is what happens. No Trumpette whining will change that.
The SCOTUS has never ruled on that to my knowledge. Classified info is classified info until declassified.