bi just for sex?

I don't like having to use labels.
So, with that said, if a guy wants to suck a cock just for fun or curiosity or just to get a load off, so what! It doesn't need a label. Just do it and enjoy it. No one should be judging!

Don't worry about the label! If it turns you on, do it!

kisses steffy

This is a good point. Why the stigma and the labels? I think I heard it said best, "You suck one cock and now your a cock sucker. You drive one truck and your not a truck Driver."
 
This is a good point. Why the stigma and the labels? I think I heard it said best, "You suck one cock and now your a cock sucker. You drive one truck and your not a truck Driver."

This is a pretty good point. Unfortunately, labelling's something human beings naturally do in language to some way or another. If the Metal genre is anything to go by, mass specification eventually just reverts back to the use of umbrella terms with more specific detail being given independently. So maybe we just need to go through a stage in which we over-label everything to the point where almost every label includes a handful of people before reverting to umbrella terms with less stigma attached.
 
Last edited:
bi just for sex

I don't understand all the hand-wringing about labels. Imagine going to a supermarket where none of the cans had labels. It is a matter of luck if you get what you want. In the same way, if you approached someone for, say, M2M sex, without knowing a thing about him, it would be luck if you got a guy who was willing, and luckier still not to get the shit kicked out of you. That is why there are gay bars and straight bars. Going into one or the other automatically "labels" you, and your chances of finding a willing man are greater if you enter a gay bar rather than a straight bar.
 
This is a good point. Why the stigma and the labels? I think I heard it said best, "You suck one cock and now your a cock sucker. You drive one truck and your not a truck Driver."

Exactly the point! A cat can have kittens in the oven, but that doesn't make them biscuits.
 
Exactly the point! A cat can have kittens in the oven, but that doesn't make them biscuits.
Unfortunately, the human mind doesn't work that way. We want and relish our labels. We are tribal critturs and we have to have a tribe of some sort-- a sexual preferences, a member of the Elk's club, a native of New York-- anything that can seperate us from the most of our fellows while establishing a connection with a few.
 
so wat do u guys think? do u think that sum bi men only hav sex wit other men because they cant always get women? or do u think theres more?

I don't even understand why you're asking the question...didn't you read my previous posts? As I clearly stated, if a woman was available, I would have gone that way. But since a woman wasn't and a guy was propositioning me, I took what sex was available.

For young guys especially, a hard cock has no conscience. You've got to get a load off where you can. No offers will be turned down, as long as privacy and secrecy is assured, and there is an level of comfort with the guy. (No old, fat, or creepy guys)
 
I think that's "slut." :D

Although that usually means "A woman who has slept with one more person than me" so let's go with "pansexual."
I think I could go with slut or pansexual. I actually like slut better, though, because it sounds dirtier. :D It describes me well, though, because I haven't really ever turned down sex if I was turned on. Now, how far I'll go depends on whether I have any condoms with me at the moment.
 
Back
Top