Calling people racists.

No reason to even try to reason with them...

There are 55 ethnic groups currently recognized by the Communist Party of China.

Ironically, there are 55 genders currently recognized in the US.

As I read through the comments on race I am forced to the conclusion that human society is in some kind of disconnect from reality. The very concept that there are more than two genders is not even worth debating. I can see the same thing is true regarding the topic of race. Leftist need to whip up a victim mentality to get people to look to them for support. So no matter what they will always see anything and everything as racist.

A border wall is racist. Identifying the country or origin of a virus is racist. Even though I never judge individuals based on genetics I am called a racist. They are just sick and beyond reason.
 
As I read through the comments on race I am forced to the conclusion that human society is in some kind of disconnect from reality. The very concept that there are more than two genders is not even worth debating. I can see the same thing is true regarding the topic of race. Leftist need to whip up a victim mentality to get people to look to them for support. So no matter what they will always see anything and everything as racist.

A border wall is racist. Identifying the country or origin of a virus is racist. Even though I never judge individuals based on genetics I am called a racist. They are just sick and beyond reason.

As in the story of the Boy Who Cried Wolf, the left's charge of "racist" carries little weight these days as it's meaning is constantly expanded to include behavior that has little or nothing to do with being a racist or racism itself.
 
Just a control tool

As in the story of the Boy Who Cried Wolf, the left's charge of "racist" carries little weight these days as it's meaning is constantly expanded to include behavior that has little or nothing to do with being a racist or racism itself.


I think that calling people "racist" or "deplorables" or all the other name calling that has become the trademark of the Left is just a control tool. Their whole socialist agenda is to mold people into "group think." So they imagine that they can shame people with name calling and that people will goose step to their ideas out of fear of being shamed. I also think that calling names is a knee jerk reaction that spews out of them when they have no logical counter argument or even the topic is something they can't touch. So they resort to playground levels of immaturity and start name calling. Again, I can see that reasoning with socialists is like reasoning with a person that is drunk. Just a waste of time.
 
I think that calling people "racist" or "deplorables" or all the other name calling that has become the trademark of the Left is just a control tool. Their whole socialist agenda is to mold people into "group think." So they imagine that they can shame people with name calling and that people will goose step to their ideas out of fear of being shamed. I also think that calling names is a knee jerk reaction that spews out of them when they have no logical counter argument or even the topic is something they can't touch. So they resort to playground levels of immaturity and start name calling. Again, I can see that reasoning with socialists is like reasoning with a person that is drunk. Just a waste of time.

Normally the left stakes out an ideological position on a given issue then builds a defensive fence around it to deflect competing ideas. A case in point is their position of Trump's travel ban as being inherently "racist," all logical challenges to that notion, or any defense of the President, are immediately labeled as racist and the presenters as a racist.
 
Normally the left stakes out an ideological position on a given issue then builds a defensive fence around it to deflect competing ideas. A case in point is their position of Trump's travel ban as being inherently "racist," all logical challenges to that notion, or any defense of the President, are immediately labeled as racist and the presenters as a racist.

Prove it.
 
If a person believes that the China Virus started in China and they call it the China Virus because they believe understanding the origin of the virus is important does that make them a racist?

I do believe that the virus started in China like a lot of deadly viruses do. It does not make me think ill of people from China. I do think their form of government is a nightmare. But my views have nothing to do with race. Nevertheless, some people that go through life slinging derogatory names at others claim that my viewpoint makes me a raciest.

If you think so please explain the logic that draws you to that conclusion.

If you think it is absurd to call a person a racist on such grounds please explain the logic of your conclusion.

Thank you.

You are not a racist. China is not a race. Oriental, Asian is a race. China is a country/ region where this virus originated. The government there tried to hide it. There is no disputing that fact.
That’s how I view it.
 
You are not a racist. China is not a race. Oriental, Asian is a race. China is a country/ region where this virus originated. The government there tried to hide it. There is no disputing that fact.
That’s how I view it.

Stop this reasonable approach to the facts shit NOW!
 
Normally the left stakes out an ideological position on a given issue then builds a defensive fence around it to deflect competing ideas. A case in point is their position of Trump's travel ban as being inherently "racist," all logical challenges to that notion, or any defense of the President, are immediately labeled as racist and the presenters as a racist.

Prove it.

Learn how to read. That way you'd have been aware of it already and wouldn't need me to teach you the equivalent of the Political ABCs.:rolleyes:

You're easier than your mother.
 
After the dog whistle there is the dog bite, such as attacks on people who look Asian.
 
A calculation

Normally the left stakes out an ideological position on a given issue then builds a defensive fence around it to deflect competing ideas. A case in point is their position of Trump's travel ban as being inherently "racist," all logical challenges to that notion, or any defense of the President, are immediately labeled as racist and the presenters as a racist.

Very true and that shows it is a calculation... it is a tool to manipulate. That is why there is no hope of reasoning with them. They are not after truth or reality. They want what they want and in their universe the end justifies their sleazy means.
 
Not sure what you mean...

After the dog whistle there is the dog bite, such as attacks on people who look Asian.


I can't agree or disagree. I just don't understand what you are saying. Please elaborate a little.

Thank you.
 
Very true and that shows it is a calculation... it is a tool to manipulate. That is why there is no hope of reasoning with them. They are not after truth or reality. They want what they want and in their universe the end justifies their sleazy means.

You just swerved into a universal truth.
 
So clear

You are not a racist. China is not a race. Oriental, Asian is a race. China is a country/ region where this virus originated. The government there tried to hide it. There is no disputing that fact.
That’s how I view it.


Thank you for making that clear. It is so clear that I can't imagine there is any debate. But you nailed it.
 
Back
Top