Calling people racists.

[badbabysitter]

There's ^ a proud purveyor of racial tropes now.

And what exact trope is that?


Is it something along the lines of your direct quote in my sig?

 

[badbabysitter]

She's big on intersectionality, an inherently identitarian and racist philosophy.

How exactly is intersectionality racist?


And nationalism is also an identarian philosophy

 

[Conager]

She is also employing the racist, Obama apologist defense:

LOL!

Racist Quenager doubles down on his fear of NEGROES IN POWER.

Noooooo!!!! They cheated!!!

One can only surmise Racist Quenager feels insecure about his lack of success in life. Successful NEGROES undermine his whole world.

One cannot disagree with the politics, actions, inactions, or policies of a political opponent who is not white is a ridiculous, pandering standard.

Notice also the implied ascription also of using "Negroes" instead of Ethiopian or African just like RacistDownSouth used "Nigger in the White House" instead of "Black" or "Africsn American."

Ascription squared. Not only assigning a motive that was neither stated nor implied, but also assigning racial epithets to the imaginary thought process.

That's my favorite thing about Hillary not being president I would have had to listen to 8 years of, "You just can't handle a strong woman in the White House," despite the fact that I didn't like her or her husband's policies the last time they were occupying the White House.

 

[Botanical11B]

How exactly is intersectionality racist?

Because it puts everyone into a 'privilege' class and victim/oppressor categories based on their skin color.

It's also the foundation for progressives saying dumb racist shit like

https://turtleboysports.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/Screen-Shot-2016-03-07-at-12.40.43-PM.png

And nationalism is also an identarian philosophy

Yes, of nation, not race, gender or sexual orientation.

 

[badbabysitter]

Because it puts everyone into a 'privilege' class and victim/oppressor categories based on their skin color.

Does noting of the sort, I identify as an Irish Canadian bisexual cis-gendered non-practicing Catholic female..that's my intersectionality


my experience is not everyone else's experience, so I try make it clear where i come.. that's intersectionality. I am not oppressing anyone by stating it. Intersectionalism is about commonality not superiority of one ideology over the other


And Bernie has never declared himself to be intersectional, in fact he has been called on his lack of it.. that's 100% ascription on your part.

Yes, of nation, not race, gender or sexual orientation.

Where nation becomes the identity over individuality ie opposing views can be declared " unamerican" in the case of the states... all nationalism

 

[bigsly]

That's my favorite thing about Hillary not being president I would have had to listen to 8 years of, "You just can't handle a strong woman in the White House," despite the fact that I didn't like her or her husband's policies the last time they were occupying the White House.

Plus the unarguable fact that an actual "strong woman" defense attorney's mind would never even entertain thoughts of strenuously insisting as part of her defense that others who dismissed the young female's claim of being raped because she somehow provoked her own rape were credible.

"strong woman" Hillary's defense worked: she got the rapist to plead to lesser charges for which he received a 5-year sentence, 4 of which were immediately suspended upon sentencing, with 2 additional months subtracted for time already served awaiting trial.

Definitely "strong woman" shit right there.

 

[Botanical11B]

Does noting of the sort,

Oh so you agree, white privilege doesn't exist in either of our nations??

Also most references directly disagree with you.

Intersectionality is a theoretical framework for understanding how aspects of one's social and political identities (gender, race, class, sexuality, ability, etc.) might combine to create unique modes of discrimination.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intersectionality

Intersectionality is the acknowledgement that within groups of people with a common identity, whether it be gender, sexuality, religion, race, or one of the many other defining aspects of identity, there exist intragroup differences. In other words, each individual experiences social structure slightly differently because the intersection of their identities reflects an intersection of overlapping oppressions. Therefore, sweeping generalizations about the struggle or power of a particular social group fail to recognize that individuals in the group also belong to other social groups and may experience other forms of marginalization.Unfortunately, institutions and social movements based on a commonly shared identity tend to disregard the presence of other marginalized identities within the group.

https://haenfler.sites.grinnell.edu/subcultural-theory-and-theorists/intersectionality/


I could go on for pages with link after link all saying the same shit...

I identify as an Irish Canadian bisexual cis-gendered non-practicing Catholic female..that's my intersectionality

You can identify as a pink bunny rabbit, doesn't make it so.

You're a white Canadian bisexual cis woman, a privileged oppressor of people of color and perpetual victim of straight cis Christian males.

And Bernie has never declared himself to be intersectional, in fact he has been called on his lack of it.. that's 100% ascription on your part.

He doesn't have to, his racist comment was based on anti-white intersectionality as promoted by intersectional leftist.

White privilege is problem!!

Where nation becomes the identity over individuality ie opposing views can be declared " unamerican" in the case of the states... all nationalism

Borderline unintelligible.

I'm going to assume your point is where nation becomes the identity some views can be declared "un-American".......yea....so??

 

[badbabysitter]

Oh so you agree, white privilege doesn't exist in either of our nations??

The existence of one thing does not disprove the existence of another... nice try

You can identify as a fucking pink bunny rabbit, doesn't make it so.

You're a white Canadian woman, a privileged oppressor of people of color.

There is truth to that, being white I come from an identity that has forced it's values on other.... not seeing how that makes me magically not intersectional or how it makes me racist

He doesn't have to, his racist comment was based on anti-white intersectionality as promoted by intersectional leftist.

It was based on what he said... your moving the goal posts to ascribe positions doesnt change that he is solely responsible for'

White privilege is problem!!

Moving the goal posts is your problem

Borderline unintelligible.

Ah. The sticking your fingers in your ears and saying lalala defense

I'm going to assume your point is where nation becomes the identity some views can be declared "un-American".......yea....so??

That's identarian. You dont seem to have a problem with it when you agree with it. Funny how that works

 

[badbabysitter]

egad, replied before you edited

 

[dp4shelly]

My husband is blond with blue eyes...

My husband is blond with blue eyes. That is a minority group. White people are the global minority and blue eyes are even more genetically unusual. Nevertheless, even though I have brown eyes I married him anyway. The color of his minority skin and minority eyes did not keep me from loving him.

So how can a woman that marries a guy from a racial minority be called racist?

 

[Botanical11B]

The existence of one thing does not disprove the existence of another... nice try

Never said it did. This is a non-response to nothing that I said.

The concept of "white privilege" as it's currently used is an exclusively intersectional concept, almost always used to demonize white people for being white.

There is truth to that,

Really? What special rights and or immunities do white people get for being white in either of our countries?

being white I come from an identity that has forced it's values on other.... not seeing how that makes me magically not intersectional or how it makes me racist

Just like every other racial identity. That has NOTHING to do with racial privileges.

It's racist because you're falsely assuming white people get special rights and or immunities for being white, a demonstrably wrong assumption that is based entirely on the intersectional ideology.

You are not your identity, you're not responsible for the sins of your race, you're an individual.

That's identarian. You dont seem to have a problem with it when you agree with it. Funny how that works

Yes it is.

Not really, not all identitarianism is the same or equal.

I don't have a problem with nationalism, I do with racism.

It's really just that simple.

 

[Conager]

Oh so you agree, white privilege doesn't exist in either of our nations??

Also most references directly disagree with you.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intersectionality

https://haenfler.sites.grinnell.edu/subcultural-theory-and-theorists/intersectionality/


I could go on for pages with link after link all saying the same shit...


You can identify as a pink bunny rabbit, doesn't make it so.

You're a white Canadian bisexual cis woman, a privileged oppressor of people of color and perpetual victim of straight cis Christian males.



He doesn't have to, his racist comment was based on anti-white intersectionality as promoted by intersectional leftist.

White privilege is problem!!



Borderline unintelligible.

I'm going to assume your point is where nation becomes the identity some views can be declared "un-American".......yea....so??

She does not get the "what" is intersecting with "what."

It is the various places that supposedly "marginalized" people intersect in their claimed victimization of their class by those of the universal oppressor's class and on a lesser basis, by each other's respective classes to the degree one can oppress based on where your victim class ranks on the pyramid of oppression. They have helpful graphics for all of this.

 

[Botanical11B]

She does not get the "what" is intersecting with "what."

No, she seems to be ignoring that bit.

 

[cjh]

Nobody got upset when started calling bovine spongiform encephalopathy "English Cow Disease."

 

[dp4shelly]

No logic at all

You're the second Deplorable this week to float this absurd idea that a legal / spiritual union automatically negates prejudices a person might have.

I did not say that being married to racial minority such as my husband who is blond with blue eyes negates the potential that a person MIGHT HAVE a prejudice. But marring a minority doesn't prove that a person has some deep-seeded racist views either.

Every thing else that I said about race and how I view it is being ignored for a reason and you come up with this strange line or reasoning to somehow convict me of a deep-seeded ill feeling toward people based on genetics. I have no such feelings and you have no logic at all.

I genuinely feel sorry for you and any others that have been brainwashed by socialists to see everything through a racial filter. You somehow have to believe that all people have an issue about race and the truth is that most do not. There are creeps that dislike others based on race rather than merit but to toss everyone into that soup is pathetic. In reality whipping up racial issues is a necessary part of socialistic control. Pumping people full of the idea that they are a victim because of their race and socialism is the savor. What a crock.

For your sake I hope you someday wake up and realize what a sick and wretched concept has been fused into your brain.

 

[Fuzzy1975]

My husband is blond with blue eyes.

So how can a woman that marries a guy from a racial minority be called racist?

Blond hair, blue eyes, were those people not referred to as the Aryan Race by Hitler?

https://hitlersgermansociety.weebly.com/hitlers-aryan-race.html

just saying....

 

[bellisarius]

You're the second Deplorable this week to float this absurd idea that a legal / spiritual union automatically negates prejudices a person might have.

I did not say that being married to racial minority such as my husband who is blond with blue eyes negates the potential that a person MIGHT HAVE a prejudice. But marring a minority doesn't prove that a person has some deep-seeded racist views either.

Every thing else that I said about race and how I view it is being ignored for a reason and you come up with this strange line or reasoning to somehow convict me of a deep-seeded ill feeling toward people based on genetics. I have no such feelings and you have no logic at all.

I genuinely feel sorry for you and any others that have been brainwashed by socialists to see everything through a racial filter. You somehow have to believe that all people have an issue about race and the truth is that most do not. There are creeps that dislike others based on race rather than merit but to toss everyone into that soup is pathetic. In reality whipping up racial issues is a necessary part of socialistic control. Pumping people full of the idea that they are a victim because of their race and socialism is the savor. What a crock.

For your sake I hope you someday wake up and realize what a sick and wretched concept has been fused into your brain.

It's called "Identity Politics" and it's the only way the Communist/Socialist can look at the world.

 

[bellisarius]

It's called "Identity Politics" and it's the only way the Communist/Socialist can look at the world.

Let me expand on that.

With the collapse of Communism and the notion of the bouguasie vs. the proletariat went with it. That class warfare model was based on the Industrial Age model of economics. Obviously the philosophers, primarily French, had to come up with a new model to keep the notion of communism alive.

The new model was the notion of the oppressors vs. the oppressed. The oppressed being defined as any identifiable minority (how they worked women in there is anyone's guess?) and the oppressors being defined as white males. They ran into a little problem there in that white males are most definitely a minority world wide. Actually there was more than one problem there in that if you start breaking minorities down to a fine enough granularity you end up with the individual (of course Western philosophy has known that for centuries).

The solution was the newly found notion of "white privilege." Of course they have yet to adequately explain from whence this "white privilege" comes. Is it genetic in nature or, if your mind works in such a manner, is it God given? Is it like property passed on from father to son? Do white women have "white privilege? If not, why not? Where does this "privilege" come from, how is it bestowed? It's one of the great unsolved mysteries.

In any event their philosophy dives ever deeper into the cesspool of bullshit.

 

[sygn]

What annoys me about Intersectionality theorists (if what I see on the GB or online reflects the real world)

isn't the Content of their theory,
it's the target groups they pick on.

They mainly go after soft targets, (people who harbour less damaging forms of prejudice, colleges or nonPC people).
I don't see them challenging really vile and dangerous racists: managers who bully minorities at work or who pick on them irl.

I think in their head they believe that that's the easiest way you change society for the better.

 

[sygn]

now I sounded just like what annoyed me lately about BB and HA.
oopsie.

 

[BoyNextDoor]

If a person believes that the China Virus started in China and they call it the China Virus because they believe understanding the origin of the virus is important does that make them a racist?

I do believe that the virus started in China like a lot of deadly viruses do. It does not make me think ill of people from China. I do think their form of government is a nightmare. But my views have nothing to do with race. Nevertheless, some people that go through life slinging derogatory names at others claim that my viewpoint makes me a raciest.

If you think so please explain the logic that draws you to that conclusion.

If you think it is absurd to call a person a racist on such grounds please explain the logic of your conclusion.

Thank you.

There are four basic definitions under which I find it makes sense to classify the processes that create our world:

Political: Processes that order behavior
Cultural: Processes that produce and disseminate meaning
Economic: Processes in which we produce and reproduce our social selves
Natural: Basically - everything else

Calling Covid-19 the "China virus" or the "Kung flu" or "Wuhan Flu" has a distinct cultural impact which attaches a pejorative meaning to Asia, Asians, foreigners, etc.

Understanding the origin of the virus is a vastly different cognitive exercise than assigning blame for the virus to a race, which is the cultural impact of superciliously calling it the "China virus".

Get it?

 

[Conager]

Yeah, we get it. China's culture has been spawning a lot of debilitating viruses.

 

[hogjack]

My husband is blond with blue eyes.

Blonde. Blue eyes. Many hearts have just melted.

 

[Carnal_Flower]

Actually, you're the only one I call a racist, because I think you are. A lot of these Deplorables just like being associated with Trump's racism, but you really are. It's fun to see you lose your shit over Obama, the first NEGRO president. You just can't BEAR it. It is intolerable. You can't accept it.

Not everyone who attacks powerful black men are being racist, but you ALWAYS are. You like to belittle them and call them imposters and frauds, because your tiny brain cannot accept that a NEGRO has achieved more in life than you ever will. It can't be true! They're faking!

She is also employing the racist, Obama apologist defense:



One cannot disagree with the politics, actions, inactions, or policies of a political opponent who is not white is a ridiculous, pandering standard.

Notice also the implied ascription also of using "Negroes" instead of Ethiopian or African just like RacistDownSouth used "Nigger in the White House" instead of "Black" or "Africsn American."

Ascription squared. Not only assigning a motive that was neither stated nor implied, but also assigning racial epithets to the imaginary thought process.

That's my favorite thing about Hillary not being president I would have had to listen to 8 years of, "You just can't handle a strong woman in the White House," despite the fact that I didn't like her or her husband's policies the last time they were occupying the White House.