Chastity, forced male chastity, and Eroticism.

[Norway_1705]

In my ideal scenario the sub never knows when or if

Exactly.
I get annoyed by captioning that mentions “release on your birthday” (what about... friends and relatives?) or “release in two weeks, but I'll add a day if you don't do... the dishes.” (!)
I can see how it might be exciting for the readers, but not for the character. The character will be bored, resigned, lacking enthusiasm for all the time already scheduled!
I agree, too, that it is much more effective if a potential release could happen any day, any time. That way, any minute could be “the magic one” and he would be perpetually on tension.

 

[Norway_1705]

According to an adage circulating on the Net (both from social psychologists and women experts in “misunderstood males”), it is this:

A), women never talk about facts but only about emotions, ... whereas,

B), men only talk about facts but never about emotions.

Obviously, an erotic literature site is the least appropriate place. The most obtuse and brutal males do not look for long novels: they jerk off to a three-minute clip and then shut down the Internet.

On an erotic literature site, chances are that a large percentage of the readers are either very sensitive men (straight), gay men, or women (straight or lesbian).

Thus, it is very likely that authors write about males talking about feelings, and females talking about emotions.

Or, and this is what happens most often in the “Forced Male Chastity - Caged Cock – FLR” category, the roles between the two genders are reversed.

The wife behaves like the traditional male figure of the 1950s: she earns more than her husband, she comes back home always late in the evening, she always drives his big car, she travels more than he does, she always goes out while he stays home (making chores and cooking). [Sorry, I recently saw the movie “Don't Worry Darling” (2022) about gender stereotypes in the 1950s... a bad movie, but nice costumes.]

The husband behaves like the traditional female figure of the 1950s: kind, submissive, shy, willing to be useful as a servant, totally friendless, with no profession or any interest outside the home (or with an unimportant lesser job, that does not make him “important” anyway).

Consequently (or does it?), it seems obvious to both readers and writers to imagine a dialogue in which the wife gives only dry orders in an assertive tone (male), and the husband responds with emotionalism and tears (female).

Example.

Baroness Hildegard Von Aubsburg was a strong and highly successful woman. Her husband, nicknamed Tiny Tim, had given up his trade and stayed at home as a housewife.

Every night very late, his wife would come home after drinking with colleagues in the pub. He would open the door naked, on his knees, with the perennial cage worn.

He would say phrases full of emotion, such as, “Thank you for coming back to fill my useless day with light, my Goddess. How can I do to delight your precious rest? I hope you are serene, but if you are not, I will do everything to soothe your dinner...”

She gave only dry orders as if she were speaking to a strange servant in a hotel. “Pick up my coat from the floor. I want white wine: champagne. In the drawing room.”

He replied with a thousand emotions, “Oh, thank you for speaking to me, my Queen! This afternoon loneliness was oppressing me, and then I got your text message, the one with a padlock and a question mark. So I immediately took a picture of myself! From that moment on, ironing your clothes was sweet for me, even though the spikes were sticking into my locked-up cock, I felt that suffering filled my heart with a delicious passion for you, with the hope that you would still want to ... I won't say give me a release, which I dare not even imagine ... but at least that you would text me again before dinner!”

She replied dryly, “No. I was at the club with someone else. The room was hot.”

.

Am I wrong? Are traditional roles reversed in dialogues as well? Do we have examples other than this one?