Climate continues to change.

Status
Not open for further replies.


It was total bullshit (i.e., a flat-out propaganda lie).



Do you think all the media reports will be retracted?
Are you holding your breath waiting for the media to issue apologies and corrections?




Like you with that graph?
 


State Attorneys General Collusion Scheme With Tort Lawyers

https://cei.org/AGclimatescheme

Un-frickin'-believable.


(exactly six paragraphs)

...Those public records reveal the anatomy of what began as an “informal coalition” of AGs to use the legal system in pursuit of an overtly political agenda in coordination with activists and plaintiffs’ lawyers. That coalition disbanded under open records and media scrutiny, but it has now reconstituted through a program by which donorsfund, privately hire, andplace investigators and prosecutors in AG offices. It uses a nonprofit organization to pass the funding through and to provide the OAGs with a network of “pro bono” attorneys and public relations services. In return, OAGs provide office space to the privately hired prosecutors; agree they are there to “advanc[e] progressive clean energy, climate change, and environmental legal positions”; and provide regular reports about their work.

Led and funded by former New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg, this scheme hires “Research Fellows,” which it then places as activist “Special Assistant Attorneys General.” All of the participating OAGs had to promise that this work would not get done but for this private funding. All OAGs also certified they are not violating the law by accepting privately funded prosecutors. At best, as several OAGs tacitly admit, this unprecedented arrangement operates in a gray area with neither prohibition nor authority. One state where the scheme is arguably illegal is New York, where disgraced former Attorney General Eric Schneiderman had a leading and organizing role at every stage of the campaign this paper describes.

The New York OAG openly boasted to a donor that its “need” for privately funded prosecutors was driven in part by the “significant strain on staff resources” that had been caused by its “non- litigation advocacy”—that described as its having “led” the resistance to the Trump administration. Importantly, the NYOAG also cited its campaign “building models for two different types of common law cases to seek compensation” from industries for supposedly having caused global warming; moreover, it “needs additional attorney resources to assist with this project.”On these bases and with a claim to having statutory authority to enter the unprecedented arrangement—a claim which on its face appears to be an invention—the NYOAG was awarded not one but two privately underwritten prosecutors.

This is the most dangerous example of a modus operandi we have found: it uses nonprofit organizations as pass-through entities by which donors can support elected officials to, in turn, use their offices to advance a specific set of policies favored by said donors. It also uses resources that legislatures will not provide and that donors cannot legally provide directly. The budget for climate policy work alone is in the tens of millions of dollars per year.

Across various levels of government—including mayors and governors—the bulk of this money is budgeted for pass-through nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) and off-the-books consultants, report writers, and public relations (PR) firms that are hired through an NGO. The NGO takes a percentage as its fee (up to 24 percent in some cases). Another component involves privately hiring and then placing in-house, non- official personnel as advisors when they are actually employed by a donor’s group. The extension of this billion-dollar per year climate industry to privately fund AG investigations sets a dangerous precedent. It represents private interests commandeering the state’s police powers to target opponents of their policy agenda and to hijack the justice system as a way to overturn the democratic process’s rejection of a political agenda...

[Full quotation or more than 5 paragraphs of copyrighted material reduced per our forum guidelines.]


(much) more...



A bunch of tort lawyers and State Attorneys General need to be indicted:
Maryland: Brian Frosh
New York: (Disgraced) Eric Schneiderman
Massachusetts: Maura Healy
Vermont: Bill Sorrell








https://cei.org/sites/default/files/1_1.png


 
Last edited by a moderator:
Don't believe the scientists: believe Trump and the oil and coal companies—their intentions are lambent and good.
 
The Discipline of Geography and Spatial Sciences at University of Tasmania is seeking a Lecturer in Climatology to join our team. The Discipline of Geography and Spatial Sciences addresses the challenges that arise at the intersection of science and society. Our work encompasses and integrates human geography, physical geography, spatial sciences, and environmental management. Our undergraduate and postgraduate teaching programs focus on Geography, Surveying and Spatial Sciences, Planning and Environmental Management. The position is based in Hobart, alongside climate and related researchers from the University, CSIRO, ACE CRC, Australian Antarctic Division and State Government. Applications from those with an interest in polar climatology (e.g., SMB processes) would be welcome.

Applications are invited for a physical climate scientist with expertise in microclimatology or high spatial-resolution climate studies. Appointment to this role will be at Academic Level B and will have a total remuneration package of up to $130,572 comprising base salary within the range of $93,711 to $111,600 plus 17% superannuation.

Further information may be found at http://careers.utas.edu.au/cw/en/job/492811/lecturer-in-physical-geography-climatology including the application process.
 
The Discipline of Geography and Spatial Sciences at University of Tasmania is seeking a Lecturer in Climatology to join our team. The Discipline of Geography and Spatial Sciences addresses the challenges that arise at the intersection of science and society. Our work encompasses and integrates human geography, physical geography, spatial sciences, and environmental management. Our undergraduate and postgraduate teaching programs focus on Geography, Surveying and Spatial Sciences, Planning and Environmental Management. The position is based in Hobart, alongside climate and related researchers from the University, CSIRO, ACE CRC, Australian Antarctic Division and State Government. Applications from those with an interest in polar climatology (e.g., SMB processes) would be welcome.

Applications are invited for a physical climate scientist with expertise in microclimatology or high spatial-resolution climate studies. Appointment to this role will be at Academic Level B and will have a total remuneration package of up to $130,572 comprising base salary within the range of $93,711 to $111,600 plus 17% superannuation.

Further information may be found at http://careers.utas.edu.au/cw/en/job/492811/lecturer-in-physical-geography-climatology including the application process.



They forgot to include something in the position description:
the applicant must also demonstrate a tolerance for Tasmanian devils.


@ 1.000 USD = 1.3912 AUD

AUD 93,711 = USD 67,359
AUD 111,600 = USD 80,218





 
Journals often append "Communication(s)" after the subject as a way of naming their publication. E.g. Nature Communications. #themoreyouknow

I just want you to know something, alright? The rain dance story... was working. Okay? It was working, and you just messed it up. Okay? I'm trying to figure you out, but I haven't yet. But it's cool. You fuck up a perfectly good lie.
 
What the hell is "climate communication".

Rain Dancing?
"The Climate Communication Prize is given for communication of climate science - not scientific research. Examples of prize qualifications are promotion of scientific literacy, clarity of message and efforts to foster respect and understanding of science-based values as they relate to the implications of climate change."

Did Trump make you stop using Google?
 
"The Climate Communication Prize is given for communication of climate science - not scientific research. Examples of prize qualifications are promotion of scientific literacy, clarity of message and efforts to foster respect and understanding of science-based values as they relate to the implications of climate change."

Did Trump make you stop using Google?

I just want you to know something, alright? The rain dance story... was working. Okay? It was working, and you just messed it up. Okay? I'm trying to figure you out, but I haven't yet. But it's cool. You fuck up a perfectly good lie.
 
Might be time to buy stock in a heavy duty earthmoving (dike building) company.
 
Might be time to buy stock in a heavy duty earthmoving (dike building) company.

If the premise is that man caused climate change then it would be the height of arrogance to use still more technology to halt it.

If we did cause it, take our lumps and get with the program. Live with nature, not despite it.

If we didn't, then fighting mother nature is not only futile but would be just as bad as the Gorephiles claim we've already been. Take our lumps, get with the program, live with nature, not despite it.

Still waiting for ANYONE on the climate scare side to give up their car, central heating and electric creature comforts...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top