LITEROTICA PODCAST
LIT CAMS (200 Free Tokens)ADULT TOYSVOD MOVIES

Climate continues to change.

Status
Not open for further replies.
ALL the window A/Cs running today! whew!

If it's gonna be this hot hurry up and melt some glaciers so I can hang on the beach from my porch.
 
trysail said:



http://www.drroyspencer.com/wp-content/uploads/UAH_LT_1979_thru_June_2018_v6-550x317.jpg



For the scientifically literate, the numerate and the informed, no comment is needed.

For the unscientific, the gullible, the credulous and the uninformed, any comment is a waste of time.


​
Click to expand...
Compare and contrast. It's fun.

From your post of 2014: http://forum.literotica.com/showpost.php?p=54076327&postcount=269
http://www.drroyspencer.com/wp-content/uploads/UAH_LT_1979_thru_November_2013_v5.6.png

What on earth happened to your data? The last decade is all changed to lower numbers. Who could have changed it?
 
phrodeau said:
What on earth happened to your data? The last decade is all changed to lower numbers. Who could have changed it?
Click to expand...
Just acknowledge that Trysail is yet another lying sack of shit, and move on.
 
Rising sea levels could cost the world $14 trillion a year by 2100

Published today in Environmental Research Letters, a study led by the UK National Oceanographic Centre (NOC) found flooding from rising sea levels could cost $14 trillion worldwide annually by 2100, if the target of holding global temperatures below 2 ºC above pre-industrial levels is missed.

What's easy to overlook in these assessments is that rising sea levels won't halt at the year 2100 - that is merely the end of the period of study. The world is already committed to sea level rise much greater than that projected for 2100 over the coming centuries. And this is probably why geoengineering is practically inevitable.
 


Frickin' priceless:

https://scienceofdoom.com/2018/03/26/californiaknew/





...and the (unfortunately necessary) explanation written by the same author:

https://scienceofdoom.com/2018/03/26/californiaknew/#comment-125443

It seems that many people don’t recognize satire.

This article is tongue in cheek, a satirical jab at the entertaining #ExxonKnew campaign and current court case to sue said oil company and others: The People of the State of California v. BP P.L.C. et al.

California knew everything that Exxon knew.
– Manabe and Wetherald published their seminal paper: Thermal equilibrium of the atmosphere with a given distribution of relative humidity in 1967.
– Ramanathan and Coakley published their paper: Climate Modeling through Radiative-Convective Methods in 1978.
– 1000s of other papers added to the analysis.
– Eminent meteorologist Jule Charney and colleagues produced a paper at the request of the National Research Council in 1979 and stated: “We estimate the most probable global warming for a doubling of CO2 to be near 3°C with a probable error of ± 1.5°C.” (see note 1)
– James Hansen gave his testimony on global warming to the Senate committee on Energy and Natural Resources in 1988.

There are no secrets here (see note 2).

Why did California burn fossil fuel in that case?

People sue thyself.


[emphasis supplied]

​
Click to expand...


​





​
 
Last edited:


New York Times Getting Bolder With Their Climate Lies

The lead story on the front page of the New York Times on January 26, 1989 was “U.S. Data Since 1895 Fail To Show Warming Trend”


https://defyccc.com/wp-content/uploads/ny-times-lies-1.png






It's only been 29 years since the NYT published this. What changed?


"U.S. Data Since 1895 Fail To Show Warming Trend"
January 26, 1989
by Philip Shabecoff

Washington, Jan. 25— After examining climate data extending back nearly 100 years, a team of Government scientists has concluded that there has been no significant change in average temperature or rainfall in the United States over that entire period...

...the new study shows that over the last century there has been no trend...

...A new analysis of annual average temperatures from 1895 to 1987 in the 48 contiguous states found no evidence of a warming trend...
​




​
 
Last edited:
trysail said:


New York Times Getting Bolder With Their Climate Lies

The lead story on the front page of the New York Times on January 26, 1989 was “U.S. Data Since 1895 Fail To Show Warming Trend”


https://defyccc.com/wp-content/uploads/ny-times-lies-1.png






It's only been 29 years since the NYT published this. What changed?


"U.S. Data Since 1895 Fail To Show Warming Trend"
January 26, 1989
by Philip Shabecoff

Washington, Jan. 25— After examining climate data extending back nearly 100 years, a team of Government scientists has concluded that there has been no significant change in average temperature or rainfall in the United States over that entire period...

...the new study shows that over the last century there has been no trend...

...A new analysis of annual average temperatures from 1895 to 1987 in the 48 contiguous states found no evidence of a warming trend...
​




​
Click to expand...
That's for the contiguous US only. That's 1.58% of the planet's area.
 


a/k/a "Stick A Fork In It"




Things That Are Over Although Their Proponents Don't Admit It Yet
by Francis Menton
(The "Manhattan Contrarian")
https://www.manhattancontrarian.com...r-although-their-proponents-dont-admit-it-yet




...The New York Times, already purple with rage over the Trump administration's actions on the environmental front, reacted to the latest developments in Australia with still more anger and invective ("A Climate Reckoning for Australia," August 21):


"Ideology and idiocy, of course, are not limited to climate policy or to any country. But it is especially dismaying when science-denying hacks and self-serving industries block action that is in the obvious and urgent interest of all humanity. That should not be happening in Australia."​


Or consider this primal scream on August 21 from a writer named Jill Filipovic at CNN:


"The [Trump administration ACE {Affordable Clean Energy rule}] proposal reflects a longstanding and fundamentally damaging idea in right-wing politics: That climate change is a matter of opinion, not fact, and that people who have no interest in the facts still deserve to hold political office. The deluded perspective is not confined to America's Republican Party. Conservatives in Australia have also latched on to the theory that climate change is debatable, and that efforts to fight it are a liberal conspiracy against big business."​


Actually, Jill, what people want is to avoid paying five times the price for their electricity for no measurable effect on the climate. But anyway, it doesn't matter, because by this time it clear that nobody -- and I mean nobody -- is going along with the program. OK, maybe California and a few other U.S. states. They add up to about 1% of the world's population. Like I said, nobody. It's over. Time to face the facts.


Emphasis added
​


​



_______________


The New York Times, obviously, simply cannot get it through their collective thick skulls that Australia is completely fed up with the climate scam and is tired of having the lights go out while electricity prices skyrocket.

​
 
"If you think that mitigated climate change is expensive, try unmitigated climate change."

- Heather Johannesen
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

P
NOAA: Carbon Dioxide in Atmosphere Reaches Highest Level in Millions of Years
Replies
5
Views
153
Saint_Ann
Saint_Ann
P
Trump administration set to shutter iconic research center in New York
Replies
2
Views
217
rachaelwillguideyou
R
Rightguide
“Climate Change” Hoax Needs to Be Removed From All U.S. Education Books
7 8 9
Replies
216
Views
4K
Politruk
P
P
Trump causes scientists to flee the U.S.
2 3
Replies
59
Views
2K
MajorRewrite
M
SugarDaddy1
The next big climate scare: Counting climate change deaths
Replies
1
Views
277
Fuzzy1975
F
Back
Top