Ever try using someone else's screen name/AV to send obscene PMs?
- Thread starter shereads
- Start date
G
Guest
Guest
Argh! The confusion, my brain can't cope!!! 
Daft lot.
This happened here a while back and got pretty mad for a while. LOL.
Daft lot.
This happened here a while back and got pretty mad for a while. LOL.
G
Guest
Guest
cantdog said:
LOL!
Two Charleys!! Fuck me, I've died and gone to heaven!
G
Guest
Guest
Amy Sweet said:Who can resist an invitation like that?
But, if you took me up on that offer now, you'd either have to fuck me as Charley, or fuck yourself. LOL!
G
Guest
Guest
Amy Sweet said:
They are! And it's fun playing with them. Hehehe!
G
Guest
Guest
Amy Sweet said:
Um... Yeah!
carsonshepherd
comeback kid
- Joined
- Jan 24, 2004
- Posts
- 14,643
shereads said:
That puppy has the hugest fucking head of any puppy I've ever seen. Is that puppy normal? Is it okay?
shereads
Sloganless
- Joined
- Jun 6, 2003
- Posts
- 19,242
Re: Re: Ever try using someone else's screen name/AV to send obscene PMs?
Rather than a stranger, let's say the recipient was barely acquainted with the Imposter-Poster and was on cordial, if not precisely friendly, terms with the AV's actual owner.
Some time ago, PM Recipient "R" received received a polite, purely platonic PM (also called a pppPM) from Actual AV Owner "A", seeking to clarify something from one of the debate threads. Recipient R replied in kind.
After that, things "got wierd," as Dr. Evil explained when he broke up with Frau.
A day or so after the purely platonic PM exchange, recipient "R" opened what appeared to be another message from AV Owner A. Only this one was a stream of obscene epithets and suggestions, followed by a puzzling line in which the author suddenly referred to himself in the third person.
Is this clear so far? It wasn't to the recipient, either. She assumed he must have meant this message for someone else, but just in case, she decided to nip the correspondence in the bud. She might have replied something like, "I have no idea what you're talking about. Go away."
Then it got wierder. A familiar name from the AH, known to have a relationship with AV Owner A, sent a PM acknowledging that the obscene PM hadn't been from AV Owner, but from her, because she had been "upset." She implied that the exchange of PMs had somehow threatened her relationship with her main squeeze.
Imagine Recipient's astonishment upon learning that a PM exchange less personal in nature than the Weather Channel had sent an adult female into a jealous snit so childish and mean-spirited that she composed a nasty message to someone she barely knew; sent it under the cover of her lovepuppy's screen name and AV; and took credit for the prank in a followup PM that contained a plea for sympathy where an apology should have been.
I hadn't given the episode another thought until prompted by some recent strangeness in the AH. Imposter Poster's Oscar® winning performance as a guileless victim reminded Recipient that she had never figured out how one Lit member managed to send PMs as another Lit member.
Password theft? Multiple Personality Syndrome?
Lisa Denton said:
Rather than a stranger, let's say the recipient was barely acquainted with the Imposter-Poster and was on cordial, if not precisely friendly, terms with the AV's actual owner.
Some time ago, PM Recipient "R" received received a polite, purely platonic PM (also called a pppPM) from Actual AV Owner "A", seeking to clarify something from one of the debate threads. Recipient R replied in kind.
After that, things "got wierd," as Dr. Evil explained when he broke up with Frau.
A day or so after the purely platonic PM exchange, recipient "R" opened what appeared to be another message from AV Owner A. Only this one was a stream of obscene epithets and suggestions, followed by a puzzling line in which the author suddenly referred to himself in the third person.
Is this clear so far? It wasn't to the recipient, either. She assumed he must have meant this message for someone else, but just in case, she decided to nip the correspondence in the bud. She might have replied something like, "I have no idea what you're talking about. Go away."
Then it got wierder. A familiar name from the AH, known to have a relationship with AV Owner A, sent a PM acknowledging that the obscene PM hadn't been from AV Owner, but from her, because she had been "upset." She implied that the exchange of PMs had somehow threatened her relationship with her main squeeze.
Imagine Recipient's astonishment upon learning that a PM exchange less personal in nature than the Weather Channel had sent an adult female into a jealous snit so childish and mean-spirited that she composed a nasty message to someone she barely knew; sent it under the cover of her lovepuppy's screen name and AV; and took credit for the prank in a followup PM that contained a plea for sympathy where an apology should have been.
I hadn't given the episode another thought until prompted by some recent strangeness in the AH. Imposter Poster's Oscar® winning performance as a guileless victim reminded Recipient that she had never figured out how one Lit member managed to send PMs as another Lit member.
Password theft? Multiple Personality Syndrome?
Last edited:
carsonshepherd
comeback kid
- Joined
- Jan 24, 2004
- Posts
- 14,643
Re: Re: Re: Ever try using someone else's screen name/AV to send obscene PMs?
Strange. Not unbelievable; some people exchange passwords as a gesture of "trust?" maybe?
That still doesn't answer my concerns about the puppy.
shereads said:Rather than a stranger, let's say the recipient was barely acquainted with the Imposter-Poster and was on cordial, if not precisely friendly, terms with the AV's actual owner.
Some time ago, PM Recipient "R" received received a polite, purely platonic PM (also called a pppPM) from Actual AV Owner "A", seeking to clarify something from one of the debate threads. Recipient R replied in kind.
After that, things "got wierd," as Dr. Evil explained when he broke up with Frau.
A day or so after the purely platonic PM exchange, recipient "R" opened what appeared to be another message from AV Owner A. Only this one was a stream of obscene ethithets and suggestions, followed by a puzzling line in which the author suddenly referred to himself in the third person.
Is this clear so far? It wasn't to the recipient, either. She assumed he must have meant this message for someone else, but just in case, she decided to nip the correspondence in the bud. She might have replied something like, "I have no idea what you're talking about. Go away."
Then it got wierder. A familiar name from the AH, known to have a relationship with AV Owner A, sent a PM acknowledging the the obscene PM hadn't been from him, but from her, because she had been "upset." She implied that the exchange of PMs had somehow threatened her relationship with her main squeeze.
Imagine Recipient's astonishment upon learning that a PM exchange less personal in nature than the Weather Channel had sent an adult female into a jealous snit so childish and mean-spirited that she composed a nasty message to someone she barely knew; sent it under the cover of her lovepuppy's screen name and AV; and took credit for the prank in a followup PM that contained a plea for sympathy where an apology should have been.
I hadn't given the episode another thought until prompted by some recent strangeness in the AH. Imposter Poster's Oscar® winning performance as a guileless victim reminded Recipient that she had never figured out how one Lit member managed to send PMs as another Lit member.
Password theft? Multiple Personality Syndrome?
Strange. Not unbelievable; some people exchange passwords as a gesture of "trust?" maybe?
That still doesn't answer my concerns about the puppy.
shereads
Sloganless
- Joined
- Jun 6, 2003
- Posts
- 19,242
Re: Re: Re: Re: Ever try using someone else's screen name/AV to send obscene PMs?
That's what I thought. They might want to reconsider.
I think the puppy's head looks overlarge because of distorted perspective, coupled with the fact that puppies that age have big heads. In English Cocker Spaniels, the noggin eventually forms the elongated shape of a yam. My own puppy, I'm convinced, is the result of a Russian experiment in which the DNA of a grizzly bear was combined with that of a sweet potato.
I don't have a scanner to post a picture of my pooch, but this one (from a breeders' association site) looks exactly like her, when I brought her home almost 13 years ago. I know she looks sad, but don't worry. At that age, she was never more than 30 seconds away from racing through the house with the end of the toilet-paper roll in her teeth.
carsonshepherd said:
That's what I thought. They might want to reconsider.
I think the puppy's head looks overlarge because of distorted perspective, coupled with the fact that puppies that age have big heads. In English Cocker Spaniels, the noggin eventually forms the elongated shape of a yam. My own puppy, I'm convinced, is the result of a Russian experiment in which the DNA of a grizzly bear was combined with that of a sweet potato.
I don't have a scanner to post a picture of my pooch, but this one (from a breeders' association site) looks exactly like her, when I brought her home almost 13 years ago. I know she looks sad, but don't worry. At that age, she was never more than 30 seconds away from racing through the house with the end of the toilet-paper roll in her teeth.
BlackShanglan
Silver-Tongued Papist
- Joined
- Jul 7, 2004
- Posts
- 16,888
Re: Re: Re: Ever try using someone else's screen name/AV to send obscene PMs?
Nature has certain ways of warning us of danger. Rattlesnakes have their rattles; poison arrow frogs have their bright colors; psychotic girlfriends have rambling, obscene, badly-spelt rants sent to near strangers. Whatever else the individual might have spelt, "AVOID" was probably the chief word to give heed to.
(Assuming, of course - and I beg your pardon at having to insert this - that the messages were as described. I add this comment merely to underscore my utter lack of position on the domestic chaos of relative strangers.)
Shanglan
shereads said:Rather than a stranger, let's say the recipient was barely acquainted with the Imposter-Poster and was on cordial, if not precisely friendly, terms with the AV's actual owner.
Some time ago, PM Recipient "R" received received a polite, purely platonic PM (also called a pppPM) from Actual AV Owner "A", seeking to clarify something from one of the debate threads. Recipient R replied in kind.
After that, things "got wierd," as Dr. Evil explained when he broke up with Frau.
A day or so after the purely platonic PM exchange, recipient "R" opened what appeared to be another message from AV Owner A. Only this one was a stream of obscene epithets and suggestions, followed by a puzzling line in which the author suddenly referred to himself in the third person.
Is this clear so far? It wasn't to the recipient, either. She assumed he must have meant this message for someone else, but just in case, she decided to nip the correspondence in the bud. She might have replied something like, "I have no idea what you're talking about. Go away."
Then it got wierder. A familiar name from the AH, known to have a relationship with AV Owner A, sent a PM acknowledging that the obscene PM hadn't been from AV Owner, but from her, because she had been "upset." She implied that the exchange of PMs had somehow threatened her relationship with her main squeeze.
Imagine Recipient's astonishment upon learning that a PM exchange less personal in nature than the Weather Channel had sent an adult female into a jealous snit so childish and mean-spirited that she composed a nasty message to someone she barely knew; sent it under the cover of her lovepuppy's screen name and AV; and took credit for the prank in a followup PM that contained a plea for sympathy where an apology should have been.
I hadn't given the episode another thought until prompted by some recent strangeness in the AH. Imposter Poster's Oscar® winning performance as a guileless victim reminded Recipient that she had never figured out how one Lit member managed to send PMs as another Lit member.
Password theft? Multiple Personality Syndrome?
Nature has certain ways of warning us of danger. Rattlesnakes have their rattles; poison arrow frogs have their bright colors; psychotic girlfriends have rambling, obscene, badly-spelt rants sent to near strangers. Whatever else the individual might have spelt, "AVOID" was probably the chief word to give heed to.
(Assuming, of course - and I beg your pardon at having to insert this - that the messages were as described. I add this comment merely to underscore my utter lack of position on the domestic chaos of relative strangers.)
Shanglan
G
Guest
Guest
Re: Re: Re: Ever try using someone else's screen name/AV to send obscene PMs?
Jeez, that's freaky shit. You mean we actually have a bunny boiler here, on the AH?
I think, as Carson said, perhaps the password was divulged to the imposter poster, as a gesture of trust.
How lovely for you to be caught up in such weirdness, Sher. Cyberland can indeed be a strange place.
Lou
shereads said:Rather than a stranger, let's say the recipient was barely acquainted with the Imposter-Poster and was on cordial, if not precisely friendly, terms with the AV's actual owner.
Some time ago, PM Recipient "R" received received a polite, purely platonic PM (also called a pppPM) from Actual AV Owner "A", seeking to clarify something from one of the debate threads. Recipient R replied in kind.
After that, things "got wierd," as Dr. Evil explained when he broke up with Frau.
A day or so after the purely platonic PM exchange, recipient "R" opened what appeared to be another message from AV Owner A. Only this one was a stream of obscene epithets and suggestions, followed by a puzzling line in which the author suddenly referred to himself in the third person.
Is this clear so far? It wasn't to the recipient, either. She assumed he must have meant this message for someone else, but just in case, she decided to nip the correspondence in the bud. She might have replied something like, "I have no idea what you're talking about. Go away."
Then it got wierder. A familiar name from the AH, known to have a relationship with AV Owner A, sent a PM acknowledging that the obscene PM hadn't been from AV Owner, but from her, because she had been "upset." She implied that the exchange of PMs had somehow threatened her relationship with her main squeeze.
Imagine Recipient's astonishment upon learning that a PM exchange less personal in nature than the Weather Channel had sent an adult female into a jealous snit so childish and mean-spirited that she composed a nasty message to someone she barely knew; sent it under the cover of her lovepuppy's screen name and AV; and took credit for the prank in a followup PM that contained a plea for sympathy where an apology should have been.
I hadn't given the episode another thought until prompted by some recent strangeness in the AH. Imposter Poster's Oscar® winning performance as a guileless victim reminded Recipient that she had never figured out how one Lit member managed to send PMs as another Lit member.
Password theft? Multiple Personality Syndrome?
Jeez, that's freaky shit. You mean we actually have a bunny boiler here, on the AH?
I think, as Carson said, perhaps the password was divulged to the imposter poster, as a gesture of trust.
How lovely for you to be caught up in such weirdness, Sher. Cyberland can indeed be a strange place.
Lou
carsonshepherd
comeback kid
- Joined
- Jan 24, 2004
- Posts
- 14,643
Cute puppy though. He does look like a sweet potato....
Similar threads
