Everyone Plays the Age Game... but

[sir_deess]

I'm wondering if it really makes all that much difference, once you get above the legal age of course.

For instance, I'm old by most standards, about to be 65 in a few months. That simply means old, not dead, not inexperienced, not without value, simply old (and then only really old to those much younger). I started having sex at the age of 12 when I was "taken on as a summer project" by a 16 year old very experienced young woman. Yes, she knew how old I was but I should probably also admit that I've always been big for My age. Presently I stand at 6'2" (187 cm) and weigh a healthy 190lbs (86.1Kg) and though I was originally born in the USA I now live in Australia.

She (thankfully) spent 3 months teaching me how to suck, fuck, and please any woman whom I was fortunate enough to get into a sexual relationship with. I have no idea who her "trainers" were but I still recall that there didn't seem to be anything that she didn't know about or hadn't done herself. She certainly knew what most women wanted in a sexual relationship and taught Me all she knew. Thankfully that "training" has served Me well over the years, and I learned that if I made a woman cum first, I never ever have to worry about My own ability to do the same as they always seem to ensure I do. And I have had many sexual female partners who all seemed to vouch for her training *smile*.

Now at age 65 (in June) I have a 40 year old Woman who is my sexual partner and who states that I still can make her cum harder than anyone in her life has been able to, including her husband.

So, My question really is: Once one takes into account the legal age thing (and anyone would, I feel, still be very silly not to ensure that any sexual partner is of legal consenting age) then how much does age in and of itself really play a part in your sexual adventures and/or relationships?

I wait with interest to hear your views on this. Do join in and give your thoughts on this subject.

Sir_Deess

 

[aka Lusty]

I think it depends more on physical health and sexual compatibility rather than age. If you can still enjoy a satisfying sex life at 65 then why the hell not? I prefer younger men (my husband is younger), but I wouldn't throw a sexy older man out of bed for eating crackers.

 

[Eilan]

Interesting. I was just discussing this with another Litster via PM.

I think it depends on the people involved. Age and maturity aren't necessarily connected. My 19 year old future sister-in-law is way more mature than my brother, who'll be 30 this month.

My hubby's 16 years older than I am (I'm 32, he's 48), and age has never been an issue for us. However, I think that if we had known each other when I was, say, 18 and he was 34 that we likely wouldn't have hooked up. He was established in the career that he's now retired from and I was a fairly immature college freshman. When we met, however, I was 27 and he was 43 and we had more common interests than we would have had when I was younger.

However, I think there are people out there who prey on those who are significantly younger than they are because they have power/control issues and they believe that a younger person will be easier to control than someone their own age or older.

I have to admit that my hubby's pretty much spoiled me for anyone too much younger than he is. I don't have the time, patience, or inclination to teach someone the ropes.

 

[sir_deess]

I agree...*smile*

I think it depends more on physical health and sexual compatibility rather than age. If you can still enjoy a satisfying sex life at 65 then why the hell not? I prefer younger men (my husband is younger), but I wouldn't throw a sexy older man out of bed for eating crackers.

Happily I still have reasonably good health. It hasn't always been so but I'm now in better shape than I've been in probably 20 years. *reaches into his nightstand to retrieve the crackers* ;-)

 

[sir_deess]

A favorite saying...

Interesting. I was just discussing this with another Litster via PM.

"I think it depends on the people involved. Age and maturity aren't necessarily connected. My 19 year old future sister-in-law is way more mature than my brother, who'll be 30 this month."

I couldn't agree more. One of My favorite sayings is "Growing old is Mandatory. Growing up is Optional."

"However, I think there are people out there who prey on those who are significantly younger than they are because they have power/control issues and they believe that a younger person will be easier to control than someone their own age or older."

Though I agree in principal, but have found that those with Power/Control issues, as they grow older and find such things as the D/s lifestyle (which I have been involved in for over 26 years now) are more inclined to put their issues into play there. The D/s lifestyle is also known as TPE which stands for Total Power Exchange. No, it doesn't mean whips and chains (though for some it may), in My case it simply means that the other person wants help to stick with a set of rules, jointly agreed on (like exercise, weight control, diet, overspending, etc) and I provide that assistance much as an old time School Master would. The unfortunate thing is that many look on that lifestyle as a preaditory playground and I am constantly councelling others, usually new to the lifestyle, NOT to let themselves run away with their dreams, but to use common sense. *shrugs*..

"I have to admit that my hubby's pretty much spoiled me for anyone too much younger than he is. I don't have the time, patience, or inclination to teach someone the ropes.

"

And I whole heartedly agree there as well. I'm surprised at how many "trophy wives" exist in this world and usually with the most unlikely people involved. *shrugs*.. different strokes I guess.

 

[sir_deess]

Guess that subject doesn't interest many, so...

HI A/all

Well, it seems like the subject I started here has exhausted itself with only two replies (and thank you both for replying). So, I guees it's time to pose another question and see if anyone jumps in to say their bit to it as well.

In writing stories (after all this is literotica) is there, or should there be, a "Ok" subject type, or should there be "No go zones" so to speak? Keeping in mind that the stories written here (and on most sites) are fictional (look at http://assm.asstr.org/erotica/ as an example) should the writer simiply stick to a set of predetermined subjects that most don't find offensive, or, should they explore subjects that most folk would shy away from (me included I might add)?

Let us know your feelings on this and join in the discussion.

Stay safe, happy and well. And, if you walk to the beat of a different drummer, walk proudly, even if you have to go buy the drum and beat it yourself.

Sir_Deess

 

[sir_deess]

Guess that subject doesn't interest many, so...

HI A/all

Well, it seems like the subject I started here has exhausted itself with only two replies (and thank you both for replying). So, I guees it's time to pose another question and see if anyone jumps in to say their bit to it as well.

In writing stories (after all this is literotica) is there, or should there be, a "Ok" subject type, or should there be "No go zones" so to speak? Keeping in mind that the stories written here (and on most sites) are fictional (look at http://assm.asstr.org/erotica/ as an example) should the writer simiply stick to a set of predetermined subjects that most don't find offensive, or, should they explore subjects that most folk would shy away from (me included I might add)?

Let us know your feelings on this and join in the discussion.

Stay safe, happy and well. And, if you walk to the beat of a different drummer, walk proudly, even if you have to go buy the drum and beat it yourself.

Sir_Deess