Expelling Sharia-Adherent Muslims is Not Unconstitutional

9-0 decision out of SCOTUS yesterday basically telling the Article III courts they are forbidden from second guessing the Administrative Courts regarding refugee status findings with the majority opinion being written by Jackson of all people.

Next thing we have to do is to forbid the use of taxpayers monies for legal representation in the Administrative courts.

Don't let the door hit you in the ass on your way out asshole.
 
Maggots are the ones who are destroying America, now causing problems to the world, and harming the environment.

Gaslighting and projection is your game.


You all are the most destructive creatures humanity has ever known.
 
Maggots are the ones who are destroying America, now causing problems to the world, and harming the environment.

Gaslighting and projection is your game.


You all are the most destructive creatures humanity has ever known.
Go commit suicide and your suffering will end.
 
Government funded representation is required to be offered for criminal offenses per sixth and fourteenth Amendments.

So removing that would be unconstitutional.
Well there ya go shit for brains. Administrative courts are NOT criminal courts. They are the immigration equivalent of Traffic Courts. You want legal representation in Traffic court? Pay for it yourself, the City/County/State/Federal isn't going to appoint you any fucking public defender.
 
Well there ya go shit for brains. Administrative courts are NOT criminal courts. They are the immigration equivalent of Traffic Courts. You want legal representation in Traffic court? Pay for it yourself, the City/County/State/Federal isn't going to appoint you any fucking public defender.
And government funded representation isn't required for that.

So what are you trying to remove again? Or are you suggesting it is being provided to these offenders?
 
Back
Top