First Ammendment Swings Both Ways

The truth is:

1] There is no truth, as any two people may agree on what "the truth" is regarding a certain situation/person/etc., but if you keep tossing them topics every few (time-period), they will disagree on another.

2] Likewise, there is no "the left", as there is no other option (to primary-school students) but "the right", which again will be disagreed upon by any 2.

Put down your pitchforks and go quietly my SJWs.
 
A British take on the issue.

J.K. Rowling stuns fans: Trump “has my full support…” (to not be censored by U.K.)

“I find almost everything that Mr. Trump says objectionable,” the Harry Potter author said. “I consider him offensive and bigoted. But he has my full support to come to my country and be offensive and bigoted there.”

She said that freedom of speech allows people to disagree, and hurt feelings are not grounds to ban someone from the country.

“If my offended feelings can constitute a travel ban on Donald Trump,” she continued. “I have no moral grounds on which to argue that those offended by feminism or the fight for transgender rights or universal suffrage should not oppress campaigners for those causes.”

While Rowling has had some harsh words for Trump, even comparing him to the evil Lord Voldemort, she had an equally stinging critique of social justice warriors who try to ban speech.

“If you seek the removal of freedoms from an opponent simply on the grounds that they have offended you, you have crossed a line to stand along tyrants who imprison, torture and kill on exactly the same justification,” Rowling said.
 
Back
Top