ChloeTzang
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- Apr 14, 2015
- Posts
- 20,185
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Every Pub POTUS since GHWB has left an economic mess that the Dem who followed him cleaned up. That includes Trump.There was no mess other than the one Biden made.
The U.S. has sent around 90 Patriot air defense missiles from storage in Israel to Poland for delivery to Ukraine, per Axios.
View attachment 2479883

It's time to let Europeans defend Europe and Ukraine. As a wise man said recently, "There are 540 million “rich” EU citizens. If they can’t contain 140 million impoverished Russians, then they don’t deserve “freedom”"
No. The alliance did not lose. The United States surrendered to the Taliban. That surrender was made on terms dictated by Donald Trump with negligible consultation with Nato allies.
Steve Jermy
Jan 29, 2025
In 2024, reflecting a popular Western belief, former Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin said: “NATO is the most powerful and successful alliance in history.” Yet just two years earlier in 2022, after a 15-year campaign, NATO was defeated by the Taliban, a rag-tag group of poorly armed insurgents.
Hegseth will never be his equal in any way.Lloyd Austin was (in my opinion) a first rate ass kisser, a second rate bureaucrat, and a fifth rate General

lol, how many times have you made this claim? NATO would roll over Russia in a second, but that would then mean Putin would try and use Nukes. Which is the only reason it hasn't happened.Right now NATO could not win a war with Russia
Are the allied forces helping or hurting the prospects of a sustainable peace? This retired Royal Navy commodore has some thoughts.
Steve Jermy
Jan 29, 2025
In 2024, reflecting a popular Western belief, former Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin said: “NATO is the most powerful and successful alliance in history.” Yet just two years earlier in 2022, after a 15-year campaign, NATO was defeated by the Taliban, a rag-tag group of poorly armed insurgents.
How can NATO’s humiliating defeat and Austin’s view be reconciled?
Of course NATO was never the most powerful military alliance in history — that accolade surely goes to the World War II Allies: the U.S., Russia, Britain, and the Commonwealth nations. Nevertheless, after 1945, NATO did its job, did it well, and those of us who served in it were proud to do so.
Since the Berlin Wall’s fall, though, its record has become tarnished. Satisfactory in Kosovo. Humiliated in Afghanistan. Strategic failure looming in Ukraine. Are we really sure NATO is up to the job of defending democratic Europe from a supposedly expansionist Russia in the doomsday scenario of a conventional NATO-Russia war?
The doomsday NATO-Russia war scenario is the defining way to explore this question. “Amateurs talk tactics, professionals study logistics,” and our strategic analysis needs to start all the way back in NATO’s logistics rear areas, then work forward to a future line of battle on the continent of Europe.
Much more here: https://responsiblestatecraft.org/nato-war-with-russia/
Exactly what I've been trying to get across for months now.
Is that going to affect prices at the pump?Ukraine is now on track to completely destroy russia’s oil industry
Is that going to affect prices at the pump?
Drill, baby, drill won't do that. All the oil easy to get at has already been pumped and burnt.No, I don't think so. Trump is pushing for increased oil production to bring oil prices down.
Drill, baby, drill won't do that. All the oil easy to get at has already been pumped and burnt.

Original thread -He is harshly critical of Russian commanders, who he says direct their troops as if they were playing a game of Command & Conquer: Red Alert. The Russians rely on crude 'meat assault' tactics, with the Ukrainians constantly preparing traps for them as they withdraw.
Gas prices didn't drop then, that I recall.Production can be increased. It was done 2016-2020.