Putin has to be shaking in his boots over the anger Trump spews in the video in front of the fake news people.
BabyBoobs 
Wishing too hard for Vladimir Putin’s removal without a clear understanding of who might replace him is a dangerous gamble, as several prominent figures waiting in the wings, such as Dmitry Medvedev, Igor Girkin, Ramzan Kadyrov, and Alexander Dugin, are not moderates but far more nationalistic, authoritarian, and openly warlike. While Putin is undeniably aggressive, his actions are often tempered by calculated strategic interests; by contrast, Medvedev now routinely calls for nuclear strikes, Girkin demands full mobilization and total war, Kadyrov advocates brutal repression and escalation, and Dugin envisions a messianic Russian empire in open conflict with the West. If Putin were suddenly removed without a managed transition, the resulting power vacuum could elevate these ultra-hawks, plunging Russia into even deeper militarism and heightening the risk of global instability. In this context, toppling Putin may not lead to peace or reform, but to something far more volatile. Wishes could have consequences.
This raises a profound and uncomfortable question: What vital U.S. interest justifies risking a nuclear strike on New York, Washington, or Chicago to defend Ukraine’s ability to fire long-range missiles into Russia? The moral argument for supporting Ukraine is strong, but the strategic one is far murkier. Ukraine is not a treaty ally, and the war, while tragic, does not threaten core U.S. security or sovereignty. Yet by eroding the line between indirect support and co-belligerence, the U.S. could be drawing a line in the sand that's already shifting beneath our feet.
The key to understanding the Russians is their history and their stated definition of what an "existential threat" is. Our leftist friends here simply don't get it. The list of brutal Russian victories is long: Golden Horde (Mongols), Sweden, Polish–Lithuanian Commonwealth, Napoleon’s France, Ottoman Empire, Persian Empire (Qajar Iran), Nazi Germany, Imperial Japan (in Manchuria), Hungarian Revolutionaries (1956), Czechoslovak Reformists (1968), Chechen Separatists, Georgian Military (2008), Crimean Khanate. They are an old-world people, with deep roots in an ancient battlefield. War is in their blood, fighting is not just a necessity, but a tradition. Losses are a lesser concern; they endure, absorb, and adapt. And when they retreat, it is rarely in defeat. Ask Napoleon at the gates of Moscow, or Hitler in the snows of Stalingrad, and they might whisper from the grave: "The chase was the easy part."
You have no clue.Russia isn’t going to attempt to nuke the US.
If Russia is afraid of Ukrainian missiles, Putin could simply remove his troops from Ukraine. No invasion, no missiles.
Putin gave multiple red lines for nukes.
The only red line I've seen is the official public policy statement concerning the use of nuclear weapons, assessing an "existential threat" to the country. Perhaps you can list those you've claimed
Yes, because you're a fucking idiot.
You suck Putin cock consistently
Produce the links, not your imagination.
It's in your thread.
You keep thinking this is a gay thing. Again, that is your issue. You sucking the Putin cock or admiring Putin is not a gay thing.... It's your ability to understand propaganda of an autocratic dictator.
You made a specific statement about what Putin said, but you can't link to it'
No, I said he has mentioned nuclear options and red lines multiple times. You've commented on this multiple times in this thread.
Im not
You don't listen to all sides.
Their public position is clear: they have no intention of using nuclear weapons unless faced with a direct, existential threat to their homeland. Let’s be honest, there is nothing in Ukraine worth sacrificing American lives or property for. Now flip the scenario. Imagine a foreign power placing military forces in Mexico or Cuba. We’ve been down that road before, and we didn’t tolerate it. So why should we expect Russia to react any differently to NATO or U.S. forces on its southern border? This isn’t strategy; it’s recklessness. It’s ignorant people playing with matches, while sitting on a powder keg.
