Yes, we had economic opportunity that didn't exist elsewhere, but it wasn't anything we did.
Apart from getting rid of the Indians, that is.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yes, we had economic opportunity that didn't exist elsewhere, but it wasn't anything we did.
Apart from getting rid of the Indians, that is.
What accounts for the tremendous explosion of American industrial technology and productivity in the late 19th Century and on into the 20th Century? Why did millions upon millions beat a path to these doors? I'll tell you, a kind of freedom and opportunity that didn't exist anywhere else.
Don't forget to add in your history of freedom the rate of union membership. Oh and be sure to do something exciting like track it to middle class income.
Anyway, let's use your freedom argument in a real world situation. Imagine there were a whole bunch of really bad guys who were going to kill you and you were, let's say 12, wouldn't you try to flee to America? Can these people share your idea of freedom, vette?
Yes we know, the Soviet Union failed because you weren't running it.![]()
A more mixed economy with less emphasis on "capitalism" than we currently have. A better education and health care system would be a wonderful place to start. We should probably shorten the official work week by at least five hours. There's an article out there right now about how Salaried workers are often bent over the barrel, but there are lots of things we COULD do.
You would call it socialism and that's just fine by me. But it would just be a new kind of Mixed Economy. And nobody seems to have a more official term than Mixed Economy for what the US has, and it's the proper term for most of Europe though Republicans like to call it European style socialism so if that's what you want to call it, yeah I'd like some more of what they're having.
So you'd like to be like the Europeans? You think Socialism is the answer to a more productive and free economy, when all of human history says differently? You think it would be better to have the government allocating resources and controlling the direction of the means of production in the economy? Do you think the goal of economy should be egalitarian in nature and not a meritocratic?
Obama has been President in my time here...
Was it just like this with Bush, except everyone who is on the attack was then on the defensive?
Interesting to see what the board will be like at the end of 2016....
You truly are one ignorant son of a whore.
LOL, it figures you agree with a moron like Giuliani.
He's a disgrace as a man and as a politician.
Yes, we know your pissed because he made the streets of NY safe again, taking you and your family off the streets.![]()
Hopefully after eight years of Hillary things will have improved.![]()
Things like good jobs certainly helped. There's a lot of stuff that went on some of which Giuliani can take credit for some of which he can't. Seeing as how I live in NYC I can tell you the violence crime was even lower under Bloomberg.
Yes, we know your pissed because he made the streets of NY safe again, taking you and your family off the streets.![]()
What was it before Rudy took over? If it was lower under Bloomberg, it's probably the continuing result of Rudy's policies.
The chart shows that the decline in violent crime in New York was a little steeper in New York than some other big cities during the Giuiliani years, but it was part of a general nationwide trend. Philip Kafinitz, professor of sociology at the City University of New York Graduate Center, notes that the drop in the crime rate began under Giuliani's Democratic predecessor, David Dinkins, and has continued under Bloomberg, who has adopted "a kindler, gentler approach" than Giuliani. The present head of the NYPD, Raymond Kelly, served in the same post under Dinkins.
Apportioning the credit for New York's falling crime rate is a matter of considerable controversy among criminologists. Some attribute the decline to improved policing methods, and the "zero tolerance" approach pioneered by Giuliani and his first police commissioner, William Bratton. Others stress demographic and sociological factors, including the rise in the immigrant and student population of New York. (According to Andrew Karmen, a criminologist at John Jay College of Criminal Justice in New York, students and recent immigrants tend to commit fewer crimes than other residents.)
"There is a big debate between the people who say the police did it, and those who say a combination of the police and other things," said David Kennedy, director of the center for crime prevention and control at the John Jay Center for Criminal Justice in New York. "That said, it was Giuliani's watch. I do think Giuliani was the catalyst...he made himself very publicly responsible for fixing the crime problem in the city."
The next chart shows the decline in murder rates in several American cities. Once again, the decline was particularly marked under Giuliani, but it has continued under Bloomberg, and is hardly unique to New York. As you can see from the chart, the New York murder rate peaked in 1990, four years before Giuliani came to office, and has been falling consistently since then. The most impressive feature about the New York trend is that the decline has been sustained for a longer period than in other cities, such as Boston and Chicago, which show a dip followed by a rise.
Giuliani said that canned corn was necessary for any trip to SE Asia![]()
What was it before Rudy took over? If it was lower under Bloomberg, it's probably the continuing result of Rudy's policies.
There are many thoughtful and nuanced reasons for what worked and what didn't. You will understand exactly zero of them so I'm not even going to bother explaining them to you.
Also, you're a piece of racist shit.