Google is Rigged

[RodgerShagnastly]

Y'all saying all that shit.

I am saying how on earth did he not already know this?

He should give Yahoo a look. They hate him even more than conservatives and Christians.

And THAT is saying something!

 

[von_Bismarck]

Lil queef believes it if trump said it.

Trump is just throwing out yet another conspiracy theory to distract people from all the bad McCain press he is getting.

Only a complete idiot would believe anything he says.

Nuff said.

 

[juttjaw]

Trump is just throwing out yet another conspiracy theory to distract people from all the bad McCain press he is getting.

Only a complete idiot would believe anything he says.

Welcome to the land of complete idiots...

 

[Rightguide]

CENSORED! How Online Media Companies Are Suppressing Conservative Speech

By Ashley Rae Goldenberg and Dan Gainor | April 16, 2018 9:06 AM EDT


The Media Research Center has undertaken an extensive study of the problem at major tech companies — Twitter, Facebook, Google and YouTube — and the results are far more troubling than most conservatives realize. Here are some of the key findings:

Twitter Leads in Censorship: Project Veritas recently had caught Twitter staffers admitting on hidden camera that they had been censoring conservatives through a technique known as shadow banning, where users think their content is getting seen widely, but it’s not. The staffers had justified it by claiming the accounts had been automated if they had words such as “America” and “God.” In 2016, Twitter had attempted to manipulate election-related tweets using the hashtags “#PodestaEmails” and “#DNCLeak.” The site also restricts pro-life ads from Live Action and even Rep. Marsha Blackburn (R-Tenn.), but allows Planned Parenthood advertisements.

Facebook’s Trending Feed Has Been Hiding Conservative Topics: A 2016 Gizmodo story had warned of Facebook’s bias. It had detailed claims by former employees that Facebook’s news curators had been instructed to hide conservative content from the “trending” section, which supposedly only features news users find compelling. Topics that had been blacklisted included Mitt Romney, the Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC) and Rand Paul. On the other hand, the term “Black Lives Matter” had also been placed into the trending section even though it was not actually trending. Facebook had also banned at least one far right European organization but had not released information on any specific statements made by the group that warranted the ban.

Google Search Aids Democrats: Google and YouTube’s corporate chairman Eric Schmidt had assisted Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign. The company’s search engine had deployed a similar bias in favor of Democrats. One study had found 2016 campaign searches were biased in favor of Hillary Clinton. Even the liberal website Slate had revealed the search engine’s results had favored both Clinton and Democratic candidates. Google also had fired engineer James Damore for criticizing the company’s “Ideological Echo Chamber.” The company had claimed he had been fired for “advancing harmful gender stereotypes in our workplace.” Damore is suing Google, saying it mistreats whites, males and conservatives.

YouTube Is Shutting Down Conservative Videos: Google’s YouTube site had created its own problems with conservative content. YouTube moderators must take their cues from the rest of Google – from shutting down entire conservative channels “by mistake” to removing videos that promote right-wing political views. YouTube’s special Creators for Change section is devoted to people using their “voices for social change” and even highlights the work of a 9/11 truther. The site’s very own YouTube page and Twitter account celebrate progressive attitudes, including uploading videos about “inspiring” gay and trans people and sharing the platform’s support for DACA.

The rest here for those interested:

https://www.newsbusters.org/blogs/c...ed-how-online-media-companies-are-suppressing

 

[Stain_mAnn]

CENSORED! How Online Media Companies Are Suppressing Conservative Speech

By Ashley Rae Goldenberg and Dan Gainor | April 16, 2018 9:06 AM EDT


The Media Research Center has undertaken an extensive study of the problem at major tech companies — Twitter, Facebook, Google and YouTube — and the results are far more troubling than most conservatives realize. Here are some of the key findings:

Twitter Leads in Censorship: Project Veritas recently had caught Twitter staffers admitting on hidden camera that they had been censoring conservatives through a technique known as shadow banning, where users think their content is getting seen widely, but it’s not. The staffers had justified it by claiming the accounts had been automated if they had words such as “America” and “God.” In 2016, Twitter had attempted to manipulate election-related tweets using the hashtags “#PodestaEmails” and “#DNCLeak.” The site also restricts pro-life ads from Live Action and even Rep. Marsha Blackburn (R-Tenn.), but allows Planned Parenthood advertisements.

Facebook’s Trending Feed Has Been Hiding Conservative Topics: A 2016 Gizmodo story had warned of Facebook’s bias. It had detailed claims by former employees that Facebook’s news curators had been instructed to hide conservative content from the “trending” section, which supposedly only features news users find compelling. Topics that had been blacklisted included Mitt Romney, the Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC) and Rand Paul. On the other hand, the term “Black Lives Matter” had also been placed into the trending section even though it was not actually trending. Facebook had also banned at least one far right European organization but had not released information on any specific statements made by the group that warranted the ban.

Google Search Aids Democrats: Google and YouTube’s corporate chairman Eric Schmidt had assisted Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign. The company’s search engine had deployed a similar bias in favor of Democrats. One study had found 2016 campaign searches were biased in favor of Hillary Clinton. Even the liberal website Slate had revealed the search engine’s results had favored both Clinton and Democratic candidates. Google also had fired engineer James Damore for criticizing the company’s “Ideological Echo Chamber.” The company had claimed he had been fired for “advancing harmful gender stereotypes in our workplace.” Damore is suing Google, saying it mistreats whites, males and conservatives.

YouTube Is Shutting Down Conservative Videos: Google’s YouTube site had created its own problems with conservative content. YouTube moderators must take their cues from the rest of Google – from shutting down entire conservative channels “by mistake” to removing videos that promote right-wing political views. YouTube’s special Creators for Change section is devoted to people using their “voices for social change” and even highlights the work of a 9/11 truther. The site’s very own YouTube page and Twitter account celebrate progressive attitudes, including uploading videos about “inspiring” gay and trans people and sharing the platform’s support for DACA.

The rest here for those interested:

https://www.newsbusters.org/blogs/c...ed-how-online-media-companies-are-suppressing

You dont like it, dont use their product or watch their shows. Nobody is forcing you to, fool.

 

[adrina]

Irony.

 

[Que]

Does anybody believe that President Trump actually did the math for his 96% claim?

He didn't have to there was a study that showed that. Of course you could Google to find it except for the fact that of course it's Google that's why you don't know about it. Well that and the fact that you only Google for confirmation bias and you only read things that resonate in your Echo chamber

 

[Que]

Irony.

Irony doesn't mean what you think it means. The fact that you have to go to a right-leaning news source to even find out that Google is biased is not irony it's evidence of what we are talking about. What's ironic is you using a left-leaning so-called fact check source to fact check, then calling it ironic. Or maybe it's just stupid.

 

[spacekowboy]

CENSORED! How Online Media Companies Are Suppressing Conservative Speech

By Ashley Rae Goldenberg and Dan Gainor | April 16, 2018 9:06 AM EDT


The Media Research Center has undertaken an extensive study of the problem at major tech companies — Twitter, Facebook, Google and YouTube — and the results are far more troubling than most conservatives realize. Here are some of the key findings:

Twitter Leads in Censorship: Project Veritas recently had caught Twitter staffers admitting on hidden camera that they had been censoring conservatives through a technique known as shadow banning, where users think their content is getting seen widely, but it’s not. The staffers had justified it by claiming the accounts had been automated if they had words such as “America” and “God.” In 2016, Twitter had attempted to manipulate election-related tweets using the hashtags “#PodestaEmails” and “#DNCLeak.” The site also restricts pro-life ads from Live Action and even Rep. Marsha Blackburn (R-Tenn.), but allows Planned Parenthood advertisements.

Facebook’s Trending Feed Has Been Hiding Conservative Topics: A 2016 Gizmodo story had warned of Facebook’s bias. It had detailed claims by former employees that Facebook’s news curators had been instructed to hide conservative content from the “trending” section, which supposedly only features news users find compelling. Topics that had been blacklisted included Mitt Romney, the Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC) and Rand Paul. On the other hand, the term “Black Lives Matter” had also been placed into the trending section even though it was not actually trending. Facebook had also banned at least one far right European organization but had not released information on any specific statements made by the group that warranted the ban.

Google Search Aids Democrats: Google and YouTube’s corporate chairman Eric Schmidt had assisted Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign. The company’s search engine had deployed a similar bias in favor of Democrats. One study had found 2016 campaign searches were biased in favor of Hillary Clinton. Even the liberal website Slate had revealed the search engine’s results had favored both Clinton and Democratic candidates. Google also had fired engineer James Damore for criticizing the company’s “Ideological Echo Chamber.” The company had claimed he had been fired for “advancing harmful gender stereotypes in our workplace.” Damore is suing Google, saying it mistreats whites, males and conservatives.

YouTube Is Shutting Down Conservative Videos: Google’s YouTube site had created its own problems with conservative content. YouTube moderators must take their cues from the rest of Google – from shutting down entire conservative channels “by mistake” to removing videos that promote right-wing political views. YouTube’s special Creators for Change section is devoted to people using their “voices for social change” and even highlights the work of a 9/11 truther. The site’s very own YouTube page and Twitter account celebrate progressive attitudes, including uploading videos about “inspiring” gay and trans people and sharing the platform’s support for DACA.

The rest here for those interested:

https://www.newsbusters.org/blogs/c...ed-how-online-media-companies-are-suppressing

Even if I bought this garbage, so what? Start yourselves a Fair and Balanced search engine. There ya go, chief. Problem solved.

 

[adrina]

Irony doesn't mean what you think it means. The fact that you have to go to a right-leaning news source to even find out that Google is biased is not irony it's evidence of what we are talking about. What's ironic is you using a left-leaning so-called fact check source to fact check, then calling it ironic. Or maybe it's just stupid.

You do whine a lot goodness gracious.

The irony is that it's an extreme right bias site with some serious factual content issues.



And of course it's "fake news" to you - it's a fact check that disagrees with something your comrade posted.

 

[RobDownSouth]

Irony.

"Newsbusters" plays an integral role in promoting perpetual conservative victimhood.

Perhaps a more appropriate name would be "newsbutthurt".

Small wonder "victims" such as NotVettebigot seek solace there. They tell him what he wants to here.

 

[silver gurl]

For fuck sake. I think some of you guys would lick his asshole if you could.

Every.single.day, he speaks nonsense. Then retracts. A week has not gone by where he has not been a complete idiot.

Unprofessional. Un-presidential. He is the equivalent to a Kardashian but thinks he is above the law, the house and that he rules the world.

 

[nowisthetime]

And Trump doesn’t like SNL (even though he hosted a few times), doesn’t like late night talk shows, doesn’t like CNN and all the fake news outlets, so let’s just cancel them as well!

He did like Roseanne though.

His humor sucks, he has no sense of humor. The only time Trumpers love humor is if it's degrading certain groups of people.

 

[Rightguide]

Even if I bought this garbage, so what? Start yourselves a Fair and Balanced search engine. There ya go, chief. Problem solved.

True, but in the beginning and for most of their existence they have touted themselves to be politically neutral and in support of free speech. Now that they have lured in a billion users they want to use that constituency as a captive audience for social experimentation, political conformity, and control.

I'm not comfortable with the biggest tech giants in the World becoming Big Brother with agenda that may or may not support the American ideals of free, open speech, and political thought. These tech giants are already helping the Communist government in China oppress and control it's population.

Now that they have become an indispensable platform for unsuspecting individuals and businesses, maybe it's time to investigate their motives which they continue to lie about to this day.

You're right about going elsewhere, many including myself already have. There are search engines out there like DuckDuckGo who do not track your search activity.

Facebook is losing users to its ever changing terms of service which floods its users with walls of indecipherable legalese and the now public knowledge of user data being the subject of unauthorized exploitation by outfits like Cambridge Analytica for political purposes. I think change is coming, one way or the other.

 

[adrina]

And liberals are the snowflakes. Sigh.

 

[IG_88]

True, but in the beginning and for most of their existence they have touted themselves to be politically neutral and in support of free speech. Now that they have lured in a billion users they want to use that constituency as a captive audience for social experimentation, political conformity, and control.

I'm not comfortable with the biggest tech giants in the World becoming Big Brother with agenda that may or may not support the American ideals of free, open speech, and political thought. These tech giants are already helping the Communist government in China oppress and control it's population.

Now that they have become an indispensable platform for unsuspecting individuals and businesses, maybe it's time to investigate their motives which they continue to lie about to this day.

You're right about going elsewhere, many including myself already have. There are search engines out there like DuckDuckGo who do not track your search activity.

Facebook is losing users to its ever changing terms of service which floods its users with walls of indecipherable legalese and the now public knowledge of user data being the subject of unauthorized exploitation by outfits like Cambridge Analytica for political purposes. I think change is coming, one way or the other.

Seriously man you've gone over the edge. Get offline for a while. Mental health is important.

 

[Pookie]

Seriously man you've gone over the edge. Get offline for a while. Mental health is important.

He'd have to leave his safe room. Not. Gonna. Happen.

 

[von_Bismarck]

He didn't have to there was a study that showed that. Of course you could Google to find it except for the fact that of course it's Google that's why you don't know about it. Well that and the fact that you only Google for confirmation bias and you only read things that resonate in your Echo chamber

Lmfao. You're approaching vetteguide levels of paranoia, queef. Time to get off the meth and clean up.

 

[bestone4ever]

Que doesn't know.

They blasted him with their truth-o-meter and fried his brain.

Trump told the retards that the market would crash and everyone would become poor if he were to be impeached

 

[Rightguide]

Seriously man you've gone over the edge. Get offline for a while. Mental health is important.

Yes, tell us all about the edge, Sy_Snootles. With a representation like yours it looks like you hit bottom several times, fucking yourself up beyond recognition with each trip.

 

[Luk]

He'd have to leave his safe room. Not. Gonna. Happen.

ISIS!​

Lmfao. You're approaching vetteguide levels of paranoia, queef. Time to get off the meth and clean up.

Never go full vettebirther.

 

[Que]

And liberals are the snowflakes. Sigh.

Yes, because they sigh and kvetch about things that are not actually happening to them.

Calling out companies that favor the Left is not being a snowflake, no matter how long the left's sordid history of mislabeling any and everything that offends their narratives.

Some of why this very observable result happens has nothing to do with any grand conspiracy, some of it is very much because of the market that the left media complex is. It is a vast echo chamber of a few select talking points which are disseminated and then parroted almost word for word across multiple platforms through multiple sites all agreeing with each other and Google sees all of that nonsense and validates it because gosh look at all these people that are citing all these other people they must be telling something worthwhile.

Independent thought on the left or the right is squelched for that reason. The left has far less independent thought because the entire point of your existence is to support the collective and what the collective agrees to do or not to do.

You can decide that the left gets to own all of the major platforms and that it's okay that by accident or design that they actively harm conservative speech but pretending it doesn't happen is either disingenuous or ill-informed. In your case I'm guessing just ill-informed.

 

[adrina]

I do hate to repeat myself, but sometimes it is called for.

And liberals are the snowflakes. Sigh.

 

[Que]

Just to save some time and effort here because no one on the left ever does much of a job articulating their position I'll go ahead and articulate it for you as per usual. Since Google and the major left-leaning media outlets say that Google does not favor left leaning major media outlets it doesn't happen, despite easily observable evidence to the contrary.

 

[Luk]

I do hate to repeat myself, but sometimes it is called for.

And liberals are the snowflakes. Sigh.

If your life was as miserable as his, you'd find someone/something else to blame too. He's upset because he thinks it's confirmation bias when in reality most people are sane and logical. Poor little fella.