Google is Rigged

[Comshaw]

Let's turn the FBI/DOJ /Intel Assets loose on the next Democrat candidate and listen to Comshaw lead the stampede to the wailing wall.

Do you really have a learning disability? Or do you suffer from an advanced case of over active confirmation bias? So what you posted, isn't that EXACTLY what happened with Hillary? I said then I didn't think there was anything to find but the investigation should be allowed to play out, well the first of the eight that is. Yes you remember, 8 separate investigations into the same damned thing. So why are ya'll whining about the first one on the Russian thing? Yea I know how you think, what's good for the opposition isn't really good for my side so we shouldn't be doing it. How much more bias and intentionally slanted can you be FFS.


Comshaw

 

[about_average]

Does anybody believe that President Trump can actually do the math for his 96% claim?

FYP, you're welcome

 

[about_average]

Google boosts search results for people and companies that pay for a boost.
In addition to key words raising ranks, site visits will also move a site up the list.

Considering that most Trump supporters refuse to believe actual facts and take everything he says as gospel, there is little likelihood that they will be visiting sites, or even searching for Trump news since they have everything he says coming direct to them via twitter.

I suspect it's people who question what he says that do searches and end up boosting the ranking of sites that present the facts that Trump is wrong on about 80% of what he says.
Of course anything that shows he was lying, again, is a conspiracy in his and his supporters eyes.

It's easy for people to check for themselves. There are sites that let you plug in URL's and will give you actual numbers.

 

[Rightguide]

Do you really have a learning disability? Or do you suffer from an advanced case of over active confirmation bias? So what you posted, isn't that EXACTLY what happened with Hillary? I said then I didn't think there was anything to find but the investigation should be allowed to play out, well the first of the eight that is. Yes you remember, 8 separate investigations into the same damned thing. So why are ya'll whining about the first one on the Russian thing? Yea I know how you think, what's good for the opposition isn't really good for my side so we shouldn't be doing it. How much more bias and intentionally slanted can you be FFS.


Comshaw

Your reputation for the duncical just when up.

 

[Comshaw]

Your reputation for the duncical just when up.

As always, when you're unable to answer with a well crafted response, fall back on a third grade retort.

Comshaw

 

[Que]

Do you really have a learning disability? Or do you suffer from an advanced case of over active confirmation bias? So what you posted, isn't that EXACTLY what happened with Hillary? I said then I didn't think there was anything to find but the investigation should be allowed to play out, well the first of the eight that is. Yes you remember, 8 separate investigations into the same damned thing. So why are ya'll whining about the first one on the Russian thing? Yea I know how you think, what's good for the opposition isn't really good for my side so we shouldn't be doing it. How much more bias and intentionally slanted can you be FFS.


Comshaw

No. That is not only not EXACTLY what happened to Hillary, it is not even close to what did not at all happen to Hillary. It was whitewashed and it was decided to whitewash it before any investigation started. Probably partly because of partisan reasons and partly because of how embarrassing that would be to Obama personally who obviously knew about Hillary's illegal scheme to get around actual Federal record-keeping statutes which everyone agrees is a thing unless a Democrat is doing it see Lois Lerner. She also was trying to .avoid potential FOIA request, and to avoid congressional oversight. All of those things are illegal. Not wanting them to be illegal and for various people to decide to give Hillary a pass on things that she definitely did that were definitely illegal doesn't make them any less illegal.

The only two kinds of people who claim otherwise. There are those that for partisan reasons like that Hillary was given a pass understand that Hillary was given a pass and just simply disingenuously claim that she did nothing wrong. The other people are people that are so grossly misinformed that they don't know what happened.

All of these things are known. The fact that you don't know them is an example of what I'm talking about about how you shouldn't waide into discussions that you don't have the basics about.

If you want to read these things and are interested in them there's plenty of source material publicly available about this.

And no I'm not going to provide you any citations whatsoever nor my going to prove anything to you. You can either inform yourself or you can stay uninformed it makes no difference to me whatsoever.

 

[RobDownSouth]

Comshaw has done exemplary work in this thread showing the inherent intellectual dishonesty in Que's positions.
​

Que and crew make 200+ pists per day, most of them political and nearly all of them excoriatin' the librul dastards.

.....but Que himself couldn't be bothered to vote in the last presidential election, nor this week's senate primary.

....and Que wonders why virtually nobody takes him seriously

Also, once again Que trots out his "I made a claim, it's up to you to prove me wrong!" mantra, a classic "Shifting The Burden Of Proof" logical fallacy.

....and Que wonders why virtually nobody takes him seriously

 

[Comshaw]

No. That is not only not EXACTLY what happened to Hillary, it is not even close to what did not at all happen to Hillary. It was whitewashed and it was decided to whitewash it before any investigation started. Probably partly because of partisan reasons and partly because of how embarrassing that would be to Obama personally who obviously knew about Hillary's illegal scheme to get around actual Federal record-keeping statutes which everyone agrees is a thing unless a Democrat is doing it see Lois Lerner. She also was trying to .avoid potential FOIA request, and to avoid congressional oversight. All of those things are illegal. Not wanting them to be illegal and for various people to decide to give Hillary a pass on things that she definitely did that were definitely illegal doesn't make them any less illegal.

The only two kinds of people who claim otherwise. There are those that for partisan reasons like that Hillary was given a pass understand that Hillary was given a pass and just simply disingenuously claim that she did nothing wrong. The other people are people that are so grossly misinformed that they don't know what happened.

All of these things are known. The fact that you don't know them is an example of what I'm talking about about how you shouldn't waide into discussions that you don't have the basics about.

If you want to read these things and are interested in them there's plenty of source material publicly available about this.

And no I'm not going to provide you any citations whatsoever nor my going to prove anything to you. You can either inform yourself or you can stay uninformed it makes no difference to me whatsoever.

I grow tired of your insufferable idiotic tripe. So your assertion is that Gowdy and the conservatives that had control of congress whitewashed the investigation into Hillary? They went through 8 investigations so as to make it look like they were seeking something but it was really to waylay suspension of their whitewashing of the events?
So EVERYONE, the Republicans, the Democrats, the Justice Department and all it's branches, not to mention the military and CIA were all in on covering for Hillary?

I always thought you were just blind to the truth. Now I realize you are much more disturbed then that. you have a mental disorder that allows to you see only those things you want to or such a liar you believe your own lies.

And of course you won't provide proof, because you can't. There isn't any. Pulling an Ish by refusing to supply any cites and trying to get me to verify your claim, or sending me on a wild chase and then when I find nothing, accusing me of not looking hard enough or ignoring what was found, isn't going to work.

I told you when I challenged you the first time, you prove your point with facts, I'd apologize and admit I was wrong publicly. You can't I won't. You've proven by your refusal to verify any of what you claim that you can't be relied on to tell anything approaching the truth.

Please, take your meds and sit quietly in a dark place. It might help the delusions.

Point proven. "nuff said


Comshaw

 

[about_average]

His numbers are the best numbers the world has ever seen. They are yuuuuuge numbers.

No, actually Mueller has a higher approval rating than Trump.

 

[about_average]

What happened to the support of the free market, like using another search engine?
Isn't that what you're supposed to do if you don't like a particular company?
I have 3 or 4 I pick from and rarely use Google.

Trump is such a snowflake.

Twitter Leads in Censorship: Project Veritas....

I quit reading soon as I saw that.
Anyone who cites Project Veritas (which was caught red handed doctoring video's to push an agenda) isn't worth reading.

 

[Que]

What happened to the support of the free market, like using another search engine?
Isn't that what you're supposed to do if you don't like a particular company?
I have 3 or 4 I pick from and rarely use Google.

Trump is such a snowflake.

I quit reading soon as I saw that.
Anyone who cites Project Veritas (which was caught red handed doctoring video's to push an agenda) isn't worth reading.

Is there a talking point that you won't parrot no matter how ridiculous?

Editing a video to the relevant portion is not "doctoring" ..epecially when you simultaneously release the entirety of the unedited footage. There's not one minute of footage that was not released. That isn't doctoring anything.

 

[Que]

What happened to the support of the free market, like using another search engine?
Isn't that what you're supposed to do if you don't like a particular company?
I have 3 or 4 I pick from and rarely use Google.

Trump is such a snowflake.

I quit reading soon as I saw that.
Anyone who cites Project Veritas (which was caught red handed doctoring video's to push an agenda) isn't worth reading.

Is there a talking point that you won't parrot no matter how ridiculous?

Editing a video to the relevant portion is not "doctoring"

..epecially when you simultaneously release the entirety of the unedited footage. There's not one minute of footage that was not released. All portions of the edited video are bracketed by unedited footage.

Nothing was added and nothing helpful to your cause was left out.

 

[Stain_mAnn]

Looks like lil queef is getting his tranny ass handed to him again and again in this thread. The fedora wearing fruit never learns.

 

[IG_88]

Lots of people not knowing how Google searches work. Or any searches for that matter.

 

[IG_88]

I used dogpile until my VPN flagged it as unreliable.



This is a quandary.

Dogpile is a metasearch and no your vpn did not tell you that.

 

[jaF0]

I don't care what Donnie or any of the other w(R)ongs say or anyone else for that matter. G searches are definitely rigged. Period. They are openly a pay-for-play site. You pay them or you play their game, they will raise your standing. You don't, they won't ... they may even bury your site so it can't be found.

Data is money to them. They manipulate results based on how much they get from that data.

They suck and if they could be put out of business, all the better.

 

[Rightguide]

I quit reading soon as I saw that.
Anyone who cites Project Veritas (which was caught red handed doctoring video's to push an agenda) isn't worth reading.

That isn't why you quit reading. You quit reading because you can't handle the truth, much like the rest of your kind.

 

[IG_88]

That isn't why you quit reading. You quit reading because you can't handle the truth, much like the rest of your kind.

You and the truth aint exactly friends, Vette. Let us not forget Obamas trip to India.

 

[Pookie]

That isn't why you quit reading. You quit reading because you can't handle the truth, much like the rest of your kind.

^^^ Truther ^^^

 

[IG_88]

^^^ Truther ^^^

And birther. And all around liar since he won't admit being Vette.

 

[Pookie]

And birther. And all around liar since he won't admit being Vette.

One sure sign of a truther.

 

[Luk]

vettebirther is an all round liar. The tubby bitch.

 

[cowslinger64]

That isn't why you quit reading. You quit reading because you can't handle the truth, much like the rest of your kind.

Here's some TRUTH for ya vette!

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news...rize-went-to-rightwing-group-beloved-by-trump

Project Veritas: how fake news prize went to rightwing group beloved by Trump
James O’Keefe’s organisation specialising in media stings received donations from Trump’s foundation but was caught red-handed peddling a false story

 

[RobDownSouth]

vettebirther is an all round liar. The tubby bitch.

Be fair, Luk.
He used to be 6'2" and 220, and he wore his pudge proudly.
After a year of fightin' ISIS, he's now (at age ~70) actually grown an inch in the past year to 6'3" and claims to be 180-something. (I suspect tapeworm).

 

[Luk]

Be fair, Luk.
He used to be 6'2" and 220, and he wore his pudge proudly.
After a year of fightin' ISIS, he's now (at age ~70) actually grown an inch in the past year to 6'3" and claims to be 180-something. (I suspect tapeworm).

He and 45 a a lot alike. Fat and managed to grow an inch after 65.