Gun Control

[water505]

Nothing could be further from the truth. Since you seem to want to know what I want, I'll tell you. I want guns sensibly regulated. It really is no big thing. It is made a big thing by dopes like you that equate any regulation with "a total ban on private gun ownership". That is stupidity supreme.

Registration nationally, trace guns used to kill back through every owner until you get to the one that put it in the hands of the outlaws and lock them up and throw away the key, or else make them an accessory to the murder. That is sensible.

In typical fashion you're too embarrassed by your own ignorance to answer the question. Maybe you didn't understand it.

Which of the things you listed would have prevented yesterday's shooting?

Is that too difficult for you? Man up and grow a pair.

 

[handysr]

Tell that to the lawyer who hits you with a wrongful death suit on behalf of orphaned kiddies. Right or wrong still going to cost you an arm and a leg.

When I sell my car to a legally licensed person and they get a speeding ticket then I get one too?

That 1970 mustang I saw pulled over the other day is gonna make the city rich! There's got to be a dozen former owners that are going to get tickets.

 

[water505]

You're trying to talk logically with people who are totally irrational.

Good luck.

 

[Hard_Rom]

You're trying to talk logically with people who are totally irrational.

Good luck.

I know! It's like beating your head against a very very thick wall.

 

[handysr]

Tell that to the lawyer who hits you with a wrongful death suit on behalf of orphaned kiddies. Right or wrong still going to cost you an arm and a leg.

There are more people in the USA killed by blunt objects than those "evil black assault rifles" every year. Now Big5 Sports and Home Depot should get sued for the sales of lethal bats and hammers.

JimBob's Liquor Mart will be sued for drunk driving cases too, right? And when a drunk idiot beats someone to death? How about the pharmacy that sells diabetes syringes that are used to cause a junkie to OD on heroin?

 

[water505]

I know! It's like beating your head against a very very thick wall.

Something you've apparently been doing for quite some time.

 

[Hard_Rom]

There are more people in the USA killed by blunt objects than those "evil black assault rifles" every year. Now Big5 Sports and Home Depot should get sued for the sales of lethal bats and hammers.

JimBob's Liquor Mart will be sued for drunk driving cases too, right? And when a drunk idiot beats someone to death? How about the pharmacy that sells diabetes syringes that are used to cause a junkie to OD on heroin?

Here we go... hammers kill more than guns. So does old age!

Hammers kill more
US is exceptional
Other places don't have the ethnic factor
Its our right
Blah
Blah
Blah

 

[water505]

Here we go... hammers kill more than guns. So does old age!

Hammers kill more
US is exceptional
Other places don't have the ethnic factor
Its our right
Blah
Blah
Blah

Go back to banging your head. When you start bleeding keep doing it for at least another hour. Don't stop until October.

 

[Hard_Rom]

Go back to banging your head. When you start bleeding keep doing it for at least another hour. Don't stop until October.

No worries. I got a thick skull. This is way too much fun. Watch the nutters throw tantrums and fits when you threaten to take away their penis extensions.

 

[handysr]

Here we go... hammers kill more than guns. So does old age!

Hammers kill more
US is exceptional
Other places don't have the ethnic factor
Its our right
Blah
Blah
Blah

Maybe we should just ban murder.

So you're saying I'm right, but still want to ban things and put restrictions on things that don't matter, going against the highest law of the land. Of which you're not a citizen.

Would you like some help getting back to that brick wall? I'm assuming that red spot is where you've been standing already.

 

[Disgustipated]

None of those things would have stopped the shooting yesterday or any other shooting.

How about a better plan:

*Ban gun free zones (That's where all of these mass shootings are taking place)
*Keep Background checks
*Require guns to be carried in by responsible adults who pass background checks in Schools, Churches, Congress and other areas.
*Open or Concealed carry legal everywhere.
*Promote gun ownership and gun safety

"And other areas"

Yeah, ok.

 

[phrodeau]

There are more people in the USA killed by blunt objects than those "evil black assault rifles" every year. Now Big5 Sports and Home Depot should get sued for the sales of lethal bats and hammers.

JimBob's Liquor Mart will be sued for drunk driving cases too, right? And when a drunk idiot beats someone to death? How about the pharmacy that sells diabetes syringes that are used to cause a junkie to OD on heroin?

One type of projectile weapon versus all types of blunt objects. You aren't very good at lying with statistics.

 

[BotanyBoy]

Tell that to the lawyer who hits you with a wrongful death suit on behalf of orphaned kiddies. Right or wrong still going to cost you an arm and a leg.

Shit would get laughed out of court here.

Here we go... hammers kill more than guns. So does old age!

Hammers kill more
US is exceptional
Other places don't have the ethnic factor
Its our right
Blah
Blah
Blah

Awww the fascist is pissed Americans have rights.
http://i2.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/facebook/000/872/439/dde.jpg

No worries. I got a thick skull. This is way too much fun. Watch the nutters throw tantrums and fits when you threaten to take away their penis extensions.

You're not threatening to take shit, you're an impotent Canadian Nazi.

 

[Phelia]

If you ever want to feel like you're getting a root canal without the hassle of having to go to the dentist, just start a GB thread about gun control, climate change, or creationism.

 

[handysr]

One type of projectile weapon versus all types of blunt objects. You aren't very good at lying with statistics.

Nice try at a distraction.
The biggest complaint about guns that liberals have is those guns so scary because they have a hand grip and folding stock. Those evil rifles are so deadly, they... they... they are less deadly than hammers.

You're not very good about being consistent about what you want to ban.

 

[handysr]

If you ever want to feel like you're getting a root canal without the hassle of having to go to the dentist, just start a GB thread about gun control, climate change, or creationism.

Ugh. I know. All those bigoted racist liberals always trying to spread their communist or socialist views keep fucking good threads.

 

[Hard_Rom]

Nice try at a distraction.
The biggest complaint about guns that liberals have is those guns so scary because they have a hand grip and folding stock. Those evil rifles are so deadly, they... they... they are less deadly than hammers.

You're not very good about being consistent about what you want to ban.

You're right. And far less dangerous than a 9mm semiauto handgun. So why don't we start with handguns and go from there.

The issue with military style weapons is they get the attention of total nut jobs. Yes a typical hunting long rifle or shotgun will do just as good a job perhaps for less money. But immature nutters with tiny penises demand tough cool looking guns. They don't have it between the legs or ears so might as well have it in their hands. Harder to go postal with a 5 round semiauto long weapon than a cut down folded stock larger capacity mag. Not impossible but a lot harder.

Why is this so fucking difficult for you to grasp. Are you shy between the ears in grey matter or summat?

 

[phrodeau]

Nice try at a distraction.
The biggest complaint about guns that liberals have is those guns so scary because they have a hand grip and folding stock. Those evil rifles are so deadly, they... they... they are less deadly than hammers.

You're not very good about being consistent about what you want to ban.

I see you are getting your boneheaded ideas from Jesus the Christ News.

 

[handysr]

You're right. And far less dangerous than a 9mm semiauto handgun. So why don't we start with handguns and go from there.

The issue with military style weapons is they get the attention of total nut jobs. Yes a typical hunting long rifle or shotgun will do just as good a job perhaps for less money. But immature nutters with tiny penises demand tough cool looking guns. They don't have it between the legs or ears so might as well have it in their hands. Harder to go postal with a 5 round semiauto long weapon than a cut down folded stock larger capacity mag. Not impossible but a lot harder.

Why is this so fucking difficult for you to grasp. Are you shy between the ears in grey matter or summat?

What is so difficult to get through your head that your annoying ideas don't matter? Guns of any type attract people of all types, whether or not they have a penis. ANY weapon can be used for evil, even if you thing a 12ga or a 30-06 are the only firearms people should own.

You've already said that you enjoy poking people simply to needle them about gun control, abortion issues, etc. who cares what you think at this point? Just because you are so jealous of the rights that the citizens of the USA have doesn't mean you have any right to voice your emasculated opinion. Go cuddle with your husband about how scary normal people are and STFU.

You clearly have issues recognizing the difference between normal people and gangbangers or terrorists. Your reduculous ideas equate saying anyone who wants to ride a motorized 2-wheel vehicle must ride some type of moped because random idiots on Harleys drive recklessly.

I see you are getting your boneheaded ideas from Jesus the Christ News.

That has nothing to do with anything. You're showing your weakness for random blurts of prejudice. Go away.
Everyone else, sorry for feeding the troll.

 

[HisArpy]

You clearly have issues recognizing the difference between normal people and gangbangers or terrorists. Your reduculous ideas equate saying anyone who wants to ride a motorized 2-wheel vehicle must ride some type of moped because random idiots on Harleys drive recklessly.

This is exactly the issue.

They don't understand and don't bother to try to understand that regular people are not terrorists or criminals. Instead, they huddle in fear and proclaim that ALL must yield to their fears.

Then they decide that in some twisty alternate reality, that satisfy the law abiding can be done with complicated vague laws that make no sense and which will never stop one single crime.

Mag capacity limits? Are you nuts? ONE bullet can kill you. And possibly the guy behind you too.
Military STYLE weapons? Are you nuts? ALL arms are weapons to be used for their intended purpose - killing things.
Handgun bans? Are you nuts? A rifle is much more dangerous than a handgun. You use a handgun to fight your way to your rifle. Not the other way around.

The "thinking" is classic knee jerk. No substance and a lot of noise and smoke.

 

[Boxlicker101]

There are more people in the USA killed by blunt objects than those "evil black assault rifles" every year. Now Big5 Sports and Home Depot should get sued for the sales of lethal bats and hammers.

JimBob's Liquor Mart will be sued for drunk driving cases too, right? And when a drunk idiot beats someone to death? How about the pharmacy that sells diabetes syringes that are used to cause a junkie to OD on heroin?

JimBob's Liquor Mart could be sued if they sold booze to an underage customer, who then runs somebody over. Or if they sell to a drunk person who then is responsible for an accident.

 

[rocket_surgery]

JimBob's Liquor Mart could be sued if they sold booze to an underage customer, who then runs somebody over. Or if they sell to a drunk person who then is responsible for an accident.

The first case is illegal from the outset so of course they are liable.. The second case is true but is more immediate than selling a gun to someone who kills weeks, months or years later.
The store can't be held liable if they sell liquor to a person who kills from drunk driving the next day.

 

[phrodeau]

The first case is illegal from the outset so of course they are liable.. The second case is true but is more immediate than selling a gun to someone who kills weeks, months or years later.
The store can't be held liable if they sell liquor to a person who kills from drunk driving the next day.

A bar can be held liable for over-serving a customer, especially if a death is involved.

 

[rocket_surgery]

A bar can be held liable for over-serving a customer, especially if a death is involved.

Yes, I said that part was true.

 

[phrodeau]

You hear a couple fighting in the parking lot. One of them comes into your store and wants to buy bullets.

May as well sell them, since if you don't, he'll get them somewhere else.