Here's How Donald Trump Could Become President

Status
Not open for further replies.
They would touch him.

:D

Even vultures have a culture of dare...

It's radiator fluid..., I double-dead-dawg dare you to drink some of it!
 
Donna Brazile says that we are criminalizing normal behavior for those who live in Washington DC.

On one hand, she is slightly twisting the truth to defend Hillary's dealings with those who pay-to-play, on the other hand she is turning the harsh light of truthful reality on the ethics of Washington DC; everyone who wants to lay, has to pay, the only differences being the vehicles by which the payola is accepted...
 
Our friend Fausta Rodriguez Wertz has been on this story for a week.

It begs the question: What was The Clinton Foundation looking for in Colombia? Here is a bit of the very complicated story: Fondo Acceso was founded in 2010 by Bill Clinton, the Mexican billionaire Carlos Slim, and the Canadian mining magnate Frank Giustra. The Clinton Foundation and the SLIM Foundation committed $10 million each to the fund.

The Clinton Foundation is a 50 percent shareholder in the company, according to its tax records. Numerous Clinton Foundation and Clinton-Giustra Enterprise Partnership officials are listed as Fondo Acceso directors in Colombian corporate filings.

The fund has reportedly distributed $1.5 million to Alimentos SAS, a fruit-pulping company, and $250,000 to the telecommunications firm Fontel SA in exchange for shareholding agreements. The Clinton Foundation and CGEP have declined to release a full list of Fondo Acceso’s investments.

...

2008: Hillary Clinton campaigns for president, is against the Colombia Free Trade Agreement.

2009: Hillary Clinton becomes Secretary of State. She starts lobbying members of Congress for approval of the CFTA, as revealed on emails released on February 2016.

2010: Bill Clinton, Carlos Slim, and Frank Giustra (who pledged $100 million to the Foundation) open Fondo Acceso. Previously, in June 2005, Gold Service International, a South American business group, paid Bill Clinton $800,000 to deliver four speeches in South America. Gold Service was pushing for the free trade agreement, which would help boost Colombian exports to the United States, and Clinton was supportive of the policy.
Silvio Canto, Jr.

http://www.americanthinker.com/blog...undation_doing_in_colombia.html#ixzz4Io8XlBnk


It's AMERICAN THINKER!

It's just a coincidence. Only right-wingers see any smoke.

This is, to quote Donna Brazile, "criminalizing normal behavior for politicians!

:mad: :mad: mad:
 
Huma's Wiener is back on the market!


Great timing...​

;) ;)

...

The permutations are endless, but one thing is clear. Anthony wanted out. He probably has for a long time. How else to explain his many self-exposures on Twitter, this last, and supposedly ultimate one, sending a tweet of himself quasi in flagrante with his four-year old son sleeping beside him to a woman he never even met? Testosterone poisoning, sure, but even more a cri de coeur to his wife: lemme outta here aw-reddi!

Wanting to get caught is, of course, the coward's way out, but maybe, in this case, the only way. Life was much more convenient for Huma and Hillary with house-husband Anthony in the picture to do the childcare. It allowed the two powerful women to function without interference, as Huma herself practically admitted in Vogue. Now, things will be different. Nevertheless, it's worth noting that even after so many humiliating front pages on the NY Post, including this allegedly final one, Huma has only announced their "separation," not divorce.

That Hillary and Huma portray themselves as battlers for women's rights is only one, particularly ludicrous, aspect of this situation. But what exactly is the nature of this duopoly? Whether it is physical is almost beside the point because the enmeshment is extraordinary.

The relationship had its beginnings when young Huma came to work at the White House in 1996, not inconsequentially not long after Monica Lewinsky arrived. This was obviously a time of great vulnerability for Hillary. No wonder she and Huma developed a bond.

But who was Huma? In a recent article, Paul Sperry—who has become something of an Abedinologist—describes the maternal background of the young woman who was born in the USA but spent most of her childhood in Saudi Arabia:

You simply must read more!

https://pjmedia.com/diaryofamadvoter/2016/08/29/huma-weiner-scandal/
 
Senators knew that she was going to engage in pay-to-play, and they confirmed her anyway...

Her answer to every question about the Foundation:

“The agreement as written already goes far beyond what any spouse of a Cabinet official has ever done.”

Note also, that she broke all of the terms of the agreement and the President took this humiliation the same way she took Bill's; he went golfing and she went to Huma...

http://nypost.com/2016/08/28/hillary-practically-promised-a-pay-to-play-state-department/
 
Hillary Clinton, the strong confident leader, the one who can take on Putin, et. al., and her camp are signaling her debate tactic, needle Trump, get him to react and then pull the ol' Lazio card on him and play the helpless female victim...

;)

What a way to shatter that glass ceiling!
 
History repeats itself:

As Bill Clinton entered the final year of his presidency, his aides put together a legacy-building trip to South Asia—the first visit to the region by a U.S. president since Jimmy Carter's in 1978. Early drafts of the itinerary featured a notable exclusion: The president would visit India, an emerging ally, but had no plans to stop in neighboring Pakistan.

There were good reasons for this. Pervez Musharraf had seized power there in a military coup six months earlier. His regime was regarded as tolerant of Islamic radicals, perhaps even complicit in their attacks, and unhelpful on nuclear talks with India. Whatever the potential benefits to regional stability, a visit would be seen as legitimizing a troublemaker. Clinton had the support of many in the foreign policy establishment and his decision was popular among liberals in his party. In an editorial published February 18, 2000, the New York Times noted, "Pakistan has been lobbying hard in Washington"; the paper urged Clinton to stand firm, absent a return to civilian rule in the country and "concrete progress" on nukes and terror.

Four days later, Hillary Clinton weighed in. At a gathering in a private home on Staten Island, Clinton said she hoped her husband would be able to find time to visit Pakistan on his trip. That she spoke up on a matter of public controversy was interesting; where she did it was noteworthy.

Clinton was the guest of honor at a $1,000-per-plate fundraiser hosted by a group of prominent Pakistani doctors in New York, who acknowledged holding the dinner as part of that lobbying effort. The immediate beneficiary? Hillary Clinton, candidate for U.S. Senate. Organizers were told they'd need to raise at least $50,000 for her to show up. They did. The secondary beneficiary? Pakistan. Two weeks after Clinton told her hosts that she hoped her husband would do what they wanted him to do, the White House announced that Bill Clinton would, indeed, include Pakistan on his trip to South Asia.

...

The White House naturally insisted that Hillary Clinton's views had no bearing on her husband's decision to change his itinerary. And a subsequent New York Times article about the curious sequence of events found "no evidence" she had prevailed upon the president to alter his plans. But that same article, published under the headline "Donating to the First Lady, Hoping the President Notices," noted the "unique aspect" of Hillary Clinton's candidacy: "While her husband still occupies the White House, people may seek to influence his policies by making donations to her Senate campaign."
Stephen F. Hayes

http://www.weeklystandard.com/aiding-and-abedin/article/2004014


Nowadays, the Times won't go anywhere near this story with a ten-foot pole.
 
Last edited:
Seven posts in a row. The Capn is officially going for DizzyBooby status. :rolleyes:

You can tell when he's upset. The posts come in waves and in the afternoon which is way past his allotted play time.

It's not totally his fault, though. Without Miles around to sound off with, AJ's continuous gusts of wind no longer have complimentary natural tree barriers to break up the flow and lessen potential damage. :(
 
Maybe if he'd state an original thought somebody would give a fuck. We're all capable of reading AmericanThinker if we so choose.
 
Maybe if he'd state an original thought somebody would give a fuck. We're all capable of reading AmericanThinker if we so choose.

*chuckle*

Not only was most of that not from TAT...,

But the reply was from one of the clown car college who are to timid to offer original thoughts, they are but mere echoes of what their handlers tell them to think.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top