Here's How Donald Trump Could Become President

Status
Not open for further replies.
Congratulations. You're as dishonest a racist shitbag as Botany Boy.
I can play those games, too. You said that NATO forced a regime change in Libya, and there was no civil war. You did not support that claim with any facts.

Do you even know which countries are in NATO? Do you understand what a regime is? Your posts present no evidence that you have any knowledge of the topic, so that makes you a parrot and an idiot.
 
How's Trump's taxes? How many millions is he going to negotiate out of paying this year.?

Think we'll see them before the election? I don't.
 
How's Trump's taxes? How many millions is he going to negotiate out of paying this year.?

Think we'll see them before the election? I don't.

I don't care.

None of the rich pay their fair share.

It's why the Clinton's established a foundation; so they could donate to themselves AND take the tax deduction. It's nothing more than a slush fund, one The Donald has contributed to, because that's what you do when you want access to politicians to get what you want done by government. So when it comes to the briber (and I always think of the classic scene featuring Rodney Dangerfield in Back to School) and the bribed, my scorn is for that individual who took the trust of the taxpayer and used it to go from "dead broke" to multi-millionaire status WHILE IN OFFICE...

I'd be more interested in the health records of the two candidates.
 
Congratulations. You're as dishonest a racist shitbag as Botany Boy.

You still seem to be having great difficulty learning the proper usage of the word racist. It does not mean people that disagree with you. Especially when they simply believe you are substantively wrong and of course have no idea when your race is.

You, like hashtag, have not given us any insight into that so how could racism have anything to do with our disagreement with you from both the right and the left. Have you ever considered that, perhaps, you're the actual idiot?

With a fairly wide range of opinions and point of views on this board represented by people from multiple countries and of all different races it's kind of amusing that you have yet to agree with anyone on anything, and rarely does anyone agree with you.

You obviously just like quarreling.
 
Alpoblurtbitch still proudly pimping her progressive sista who charged a 12-year-old girl with being complicit in her own horrendous rape by a 41-year-old man who, thanks to Billary's defense, received only a year in the county jail for his horrendous rape of that 12-year-old girl...

Which is kind of strange because in rape threads on the GB, Alpo seems to so pseudo-righteously wail against even the suggestion that any female can possibly be complicit in their own rape, just as she protests so much against light sentences handed-down to convicted rapists.

Huh...

I wonder why the totally blatant two-facedness?

http://www.sherv.net/cm/emo/laughing/roflmao.gif
 
I don't care.

None of the rich pay their fair share.

It's why the Clinton's established a foundation; so they could donate to themselves AND take the tax deduction. It's nothing more than a slush fund, one The Donald has contributed to, because that's what you do when you want access to politicians to get what you want done by government. So when it comes to the briber (and I always think of the classic scene featuring Rodney Dangerfield in Back to School) and the bribed, my scorn is for that individual who took the trust of the taxpayer and used it to go from "dead broke" to multi-millionaire status WHILE IN OFFICE...

I'd be more interested in the health records of the two candidates.

Actually as far as charities go the Clinton Foundation appears to be one of the better ones.
 
taxes. show's the guy's character.

you know, what you seem to be so worried about HC.

But we all know his character. he's a scum bag who contracts with people and then doesn't pay them what he's contracted for. and then says sue me to get what I owe you. seems to be a standard business practice of his.

when you enter contracts and do not pay seems like it could be fraud.

how's the university suite going? another one of his frauds.

where's Miles? Trump's your fraud!!!!
 
taxes. show's the guy's character.

you know, what you seem to be so worried about HC.

But we all know his character. he's a scum bag who contracts with people and then doesn't pay them what he's contracted for. and then says sue me to get what I owe you. seems to be a standard business practice of his.

when you enter contracts and do not pay seems like it could be fraud.

how's the university suite going? another one of his frauds.

where's Miles? Trump's your fraud!!!!

I don't think the university offers suites. I'm pretty sure they only offer studio apartments in dormitories
 
I don't care.

None of the rich pay their fair share.


Much to the point, the Clintons do (or don't you consider them rich?). They have produced their tax records for decades, and they not only pay all the taxes they are asked to pay, they also give more than 10 percent of their taxed income to charity. (Quite possibly not out of altruism rather than political savvy. But they do it and you are lying to indicate they don't. It's all in the public eye.)

Just the comparison of the two presidential candidates alone belies your gross generalization. I'm sure there are a lot of rich people who pay what they are told, by law, is their fair share.

This isn't a rah, rah, for the Clintons. It's an obvious counter to your lying generalization. Who, other than hardcore partisans, like you, do you think you're fooling?

I'm sure that Trump's tax returns would show us a whole lot of negatives about him--like that he owes a lot more than he makes, that he's cheating on his declarations, that he's in bed with undesirables, that he gives nothing to charity and that his declared charities wind up in his own bank accounts, etc. And it's because of this that he won't release the tax data that every other presidential candidate for decades has done--and the Clintons, for instance, have done back into the 80s.

The only issue that is clear here is that Trump is a con artist and "fair share" wealth hider in criminal proportions that take him entirely away from and beyond the "everyone does it" argument. Not to mention that everyone doesn't do it and you have the classic example in front of you in comparing the two presidential candidates.
 
I'd be more interested in the health records of the two candidates.

I agree with you. We've already got chapter and verse on the illiterate doctor who supposedly examined Trump (while Trump was sitting in his limousine and the doctor, by his own admission, was sitting in his office).

I think seeing the actual health records would close down another one of the Switfboating angles you disgusting people are floating.
 
So Trump meets with the president of Mexico and decides not to bring up the one thing he talks about at every rally, the one thing most of his dumbass supporters know about his platform: who's paying for the border wall.

All talk, no action bitch. :D

And apparently on some kind of serious drugs. I thought he might actually nod off at the podium.
 
So Trump meets with the president of Mexico and decides not to bring up the one thing he talks about at every rally, the one thing most of his dumbass supporters know about his platform: who's paying for the border wall.

All talk, no action bitch. :D

And apparently on some kind of serious drugs. I thought he might actually nod off at the podium.

:rolleyes:

In the primaries you pander to your base.

He has them locked up.

In the general you move to the center and make your itch to moderates and independents. So now that he is saying what they want to hear, you guys don't like the fact that he's moving closer to your position? You don't like compromise? You want him to run only to his base? Is that the only way Hillary can win since she is clearly afraid to stray too far from the Sanders base...

;)

Oh, and by the way, WHERE IS MRS. CLINTON?
 
Oh, and by the way, yes, the Clintons are very clever in releasing their personal tax records. The problem here is that they want Trump to open up his business tax records while they have yet to release full and complete tax records and donations and donors of the Foundation that operates as their pay-to-play slush fund.

When they offer the clarity they are hypocritically demanding, then I'll also call on Trump to release his tax records. As long as a lot of you insist that this is just about Trump while holding the Clintons as paragons, I will continue not to give a fuck about either his tax records or who you think/imagine he's screwed in business...
 
Why did Mrs. Clinton not think it important to visit the President of Mexico?

;)

Some might see that as a snub to just another entity that she means to rule...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top