Here's How Donald Trump Could Become President

[Aglaopheme]

THE INTERNET, September 6 (AP) -- The most prolific posters in the history of the Literotica General Board have come out in favor of releasing Charles Manson from prison, arguing that the 81-year-old mastermind of the 1969 Tate-LaBianca murders was a private citizen at the time.

4est_4est_Gump, colloquially known as AJ, and xbb, the former busybody, said that Manson was playing a "rigged game" in the only way he knew how, and "therefore, we are in no position to judge him unless we also agree that Hillary Clinton should receive the death penalty for having jaywalked across Constitution Avenue this one time when she was a U.S. senator," in the words of a joint statement released by the two longtime GB allies.

Calling the seven victims of the murders that rocked American society "fair game, and probably libs besides," the statement says that the original intent of the framers of the Constitution, Ayn Rand, and Alex Jones justifies the separate standards. "Certainly murder committed by a public official or a First Lady is still a crime," they concede, but laws against murder by private citizens "violate sacred principles of human freedom, and could lead to the election of a Democratic President, which is kind of the same thing." The statement did express concern about the fact that all of Manson's victims were white, adding that "in such cases, a small fine may be called for."

AJ could not be reached for further comment. Asked to elaborate on the statement, xbb merely issued a series of grunts and screeches punctuated by the word "Nigger!"

Clinton, the 2016 Democratic nominee for President, trails Republican Donald Trump 96-3 in the most recent Toubab/Let's Throw Shit Against The Wall poll.

Brilliant!


I was just reading through thinking about the overall attitudes in this thread. The Clintons have been investigated ad nauseum across decades with nothing of merit, meaning nothing to destroy their political careers, to be found. Still people rant and rave about Benghazi, and .05% of atypically marked emails, etc. Today it's Mogadishu, too! Trump, on the other hand, gets a pass "He's a businessman why would we we'd to see his taxes?" and so on. Aren't they running for the same office?

Will anyone on this thread even admit that they will vote for Trump?

 

[Disgustipated]

If I'm going to be accused of posting "shit against the wall" polls I might as well post this, just released this morning:

CNN/ORC

Trump 45

Clinton 43

Interestingly, Trump leads 49-29 among independents in this national poll.

And the Survey Monkey polls shows Drumpf getting clobbered even in the Republican stronghold demographic. Just fucking stop.

 

[Disgustipated]

Brilliant!


I was just reading through thinking about the overall attitudes in this thread. The Clintons have been investigated ad nauseum across decades with nothing of merit, meaning nothing to destroy their political careers, to be found. Still people rant and rave about Benghazi, and .05% of atypically marked emails, etc. Today it's Mogadishu, too! Trump, on the other hand, gets a pass "He's a businessman why would we we'd to see his taxes?" and so on. Aren't they running for the same office?

Will anyone on this thread even admit that they will vote for Trump?

WE is pretty genius.

 

[toubab]

And the Survey Monkey polls shows Drumpf getting clobbered even in the Republican stronghold demographic. Just fucking stop.

If you're talking about a Survey Monkey national poll from the same time period, one of them must be wrong, correct?

 

[Disgustipated]

If you're talking about a Survey Monkey national poll from the same time period, one of them must be wrong, correct?

Why just one? That's your problem.

 

[Aglaopheme]

WE is pretty genius.

Yup. That is one couple that I would extend an invitation to if I were hosting a lit dinner party.

 

[Disgustipated]

Yup. That is one couple that I would extend an invitation to if I were hosting a lit dinner party.

To be fair, Ardy does have better tits than WE. Slightly.

 

[toubab]

Why just one? That's your problem.

At least one MUST be wrong. That's your problem.

 

[Wrong Element]

If I'm going to be accused of posting "shit against the wall" polls I might as well post this, just released this morning:

CNN/ORC

Trump 45

Clinton 43

Interestingly, Trump leads 49-29 among independents in this national poll.

Oh geez, get a sense of humor. But I don't think anyone will be surprised that of the two major polls released this morning, the one that showed Trump ahead is the one you chose to highlight. You earned my shout-out.

This particular poll is of likely voters (their poll of registered voters has Clinton ahead), and it samples more Republicans than Democrats -- not just more than the usual, more period. This tells me that either 1) it's a bad sample; or 2) CNN's people believe that even though self-described Democrats outnumber Republicans by about 5 to 7 percent in the United States, more Republicans really will vote this fall (in other words, it's going to look more like a midterm electorate).

The poll might also reflect a lack of Democratic excitement based on the fact that Clinton mistakenly chose to spend almost all of August out of sight, which might have been a no-brainer in most years (people generally pay little attention to the race in August if there's no convention happening), but not against someone whose tweets are treated by cable news as if they were issued from Mount Sinai.

At any rate, the CNN poll isn't worth getting excited about until it's bolstered by other data, and I think anyone who is a veteran of the 2012 Gallup Poll wars here should agree.

 

[Disgustipated]

At least one MUST be wrong. That's your problem.

Says who? What makes one more right than the other? Quit being a tool, fool.

 

[toubab]

Oh geez, get a sense of humor. But I don't think anyone will be surprised that of the two major polls released this morning, the one that showed Trump ahead is the one you chose to highlight. You earned my shout-out.

This particular poll is of likely voters (their poll of registered voters has Clinton ahead), and it samples more Republicans than Democrats -- not just more than the usual, more period. This tells me that either 1) it's a bad sample; or 2) CNN's people believe that even though self-described Democrats outnumber Republicans by about 5 to 7 percent in the United States, more Republicans really will vote this fall (in other words, it's going to look more like a midterm electorate).

The poll might also reflect a lack of Democratic excitement based on the fact that Clinton mistakenly chose to spend almost all of August out of sight, which might have been a no-brainer in most years (people generally pay little attention to the race in August if there's no convention happening), but not against someone whose tweets are treated by cable news as if they were issued from Mount Sinai.

At any rate, the CNN poll isn't worth getting excited about until it's bolstered by other data, and I think anyone who is a veteran of the 2012 Gallup Poll wars here should agree.

I chose to highlight the CNN poll because I figured it qualified as a "shit against the wall" poll. Obviously, from your response, I figured correctly.

 

[toubab]

Says who? What makes one more right than the other? Quit being a tool, fool.

You are clearly the fool if you think they can both be right, dumbass.

 

[Disgustipated]

You are clearly the fool if you think they can both be right, dumbass.

I don't. I think they are both horseshit. Come at me, bro.

 

[Wrong Element]

To be fair, Ardy does have better tits than WE. Slightly.

The polls are right on this one.

 

[toubab]

I don't. I think they are both horseshit. Come at me, bro.

Not worth my time, bro.

 

[Adre]

Here's a number for ya. Clinton at about 341 this morning.

 

[Aglaopheme]

Of course riding the Convention wave and raising a record amount of money was the wrong thing to do. We know she can't do anything right. I mean look where she's gotten in her life.

 

[Disgustipated]

Not worth my time, bro.

Catch a ride with Q-####.

 

[Adre]

By the way, Query must win the irrelevant allusion of the year award for reaching back 23 years to Mogadishu. Well played!

 

[eyerami]

Why did GB progressives vote for, and still support, a Clinton who was bubbas with Jerry Epstein and who officially logged over 20 flights on Epstein's Lolita Express?

Why will GB progressives vote for another Clinton who implicated a 12-year-old girl in her own horrendous rape by a 41-year-old man, whom Billary won a plea deal for that only put her client in county jail for a year for so viciously raping a 12-year-old girl?

I remember 20 years ago or so hearing a prominent Republican state that winning elections was the only thing that mattered, that political principles and platforms only come into play if you win...

...I've never given any other like-minded Republican any credence since.

It's truly lovely reading GB progressives so much attuned with that Republican piece of shit thinking, just as it's neat to read so many Republicans are going to vote for Billary.

 

[Disgustipated]

Why did GB progressives vote for, and still support, a Clinton who was bubbas with Jerry Epstein and who officially logged over 20 flights on Epstein's Lolita Express?

Why will GB progressives vote for another Clinton who implicated a 12-year-old girl in her own horrendous rape by a 41-year-old man, whom Billary won a plea deal for that only put her client in county jail for a year for so viciously raping a 12-year-old girl?

I remember 20 years ago or so hearing a prominent Republican state that winning elections was the only thing that mattered, that political principles and platforms only come into play if you win...

...I've never given any other like-minded Republican any credence since.

It's truly lovely reading GB progressives so much attuned with that Republican piece of shit thinking, just as it's neat to read so many Republicans are going to vote for Billary.

Which "progressive" is "supporting" Clinton?

Name one.

Just one.

 

[Wrong Element]

The two polls aren't as far apart as they seem at first blush, when you factor in the CNN poll's margin of error and its registered voter vs. likely voter screen.

The thing with the NBC News/SurveyMonkey poll is that its sample size is really big, making for a margin of error of only +/- 1 percent. That explains why it hasn't really budged of late, and that reflects common sense, since in a race between two very well-known candidates, most voters have known for a long time who they're going to be supporting.

My sense is that the so-called "tightening" of the race isn't about Trump actually gaining support; it's more about people who had moved to Clinton after the convention shifting to Undecided or to the minor candidates, after a few weeks where she wasn't campaigning and the only things you heard about her came from her opponents or the news media (excuse the redundancy).

I still think in the end Trump will have trouble getting over 40 percent. I mean, it's Donald Trump.

 

[Que]

By the way, Query must win the irrelevant allusion of the year award for reaching back 23 years to Mogadishu. Well played!

So when Hillary inevitably invokes "her" previous administration as a feather in her cap you're going to tell her that it's irrelevant because it's 23 years ago, right?

Or is it only going to be relevant when she takes credit for the.com bubble not having birth just yet the peace dividend from Reagan's policies welfare reform and a balanced budget from Newt Gingrich all of those accomplishments which they fought tooth-and-nail will be relevant, right?

 

[Adre]

So when Hillary inevitably invokes "her" previous administration as a feather in her cap you're going to tell her that it's irrelevant because it's 23 years ago, right?

Or is it only going to be relevant when she takes credit for the.com bubble not having birth just yet the peace dividend from Reagan's policies welfare reform and a balanced budget from Newt Gingrich all of those accomplishments which they fought tooth-and-nail will be relevant, right?

Yes, you have stumbled into the truth. All irrelevant. All that matters is 341, which is the approximate number of electoral votes she likely has as of this morning. And that will soon be irrelevant as well.

 

[Adre]

Looks like Donnie boy is lining his pockets with donor money, but, but, emails...